Talk:Sable (video game)

Orphaned references in Sable (video game)

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Sable (video game)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "AllMusic":

• From Jubilee (Japanese Breakfast album): Collar, Matt (June 11, 2021). "Jubilee – Japanese Breakfast". AllMusic. Retrieved June 11, 2021.
• From Ambient pop: Abebe, Nitsuh. "Pygmalion – Slowdive". AllMusic. Retrieved 10 July 2017.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 20:19, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

Split proposal

I'm proposing we split the soundtrack section into its own article with the title Sable (soundtrack). The section isn't so huge as to make a problem, but it's big enough to be a standalone article as is. Notability is clear given the AllMusic and Pitchfork reviews among other coverage. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 20:03, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Not a terrible idea, but the reviewer is accurate in saying that it's more like a list of neural responses than an album. I guess that doesn't matter for Wikipedia's purposes. What kind of hints at notability are the YouTube comments saying that they bought the vinyl and then went to look at the game. GreenReaper (talk) 13:42, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

@GreenReaper Doesn't really matter what the review says; notability is determined by whether coverage from reliable publications exists, and per RSMUSIC, AllMusic and Pitchfork both mean it meets that standard. I have no idea what YouTube comments you're referring to, but generally I would dismiss those as USERGENERATED and not worry about them, unless they've been collected and reported on by a reliable pub writing about fan reactions. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 14:27, 24 March 2024 (UTC)

• Oppose Not lengthy enough right now to convincingly merit a split. It can easily be worked into the article so it's less "off in a section by itself". ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 16:39, 24 March 2024 (UTC)