This article is within the scope of WikiProject Neopaganism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Neopaganism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NeopaganismWikipedia:WikiProject NeopaganismTemplate:WikiProject NeopaganismNeopaganism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occult, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the occult on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OccultWikipedia:WikiProject OccultTemplate:WikiProject OccultOccult articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Being as this is an article on 'Rule of Three (Wicca)', specifically, I would propose that the section titled "Anthroposophy" does not belong here and should be removed. It is not relevant Rule of Three (Wicca) and this is not a space for comparison of supposedly similar principles in other works, philosophies, and religions. This article is specifically for the "rule of three" in Wicca. Being as there is no connection between the article's subject and Anthroposophy, that section should be removed from this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.67.79.87 (talk) 19:49, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
---Article has been adited to remove the "Anthroposophy" section, in line with above observation. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.67.73.51 (talk) 23:05, 23 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Where it says "when thou receivest good, so equally art bound to return good threefold" does not seem to say that one will get threefold good return but that one is bound to return/do threefold good. Of course, the English is weird, but this seems to be what it means, not what the article appears to say (skimming). Original author explanation available? Misty MH (talk) 05:15, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
.png){kind=small}
