Talk:Return of results

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Ethics Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Ethics

Example situation

Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I put a section in this article called "example situation" and modeled a set of issues which I found in an article about problems with return of results as it relates to genetics research done from biobanks. This is not representative of what the term "return of results" means, and actually the term can mean many things. But the example I give is a hot topic and is discussed often in a lot of literature because it is problematic.

I would love to see examples of situations when "return of results" was applied and research participants, especially those from a large-scale study, were informed of the result of a study pleased by this. Does anyone have sources for this kind of example? Blue Rasberry (talk) 23:28, 13 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add topic