Talk:Naga people

Untitled

"Fundamentalist" may be tendentious, or as we say hereabouts, not NPOV. --Haruo 03:12, 28 August 2005 (UTC)

Second World War

No mention of the Naga people aid to the British against the Japanese during the Second World War? I do not have any details but I know that there contriobution to the halting of the Japanese progress accross the region was significant. Will try to find some details. --Drgs100 13:16, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 16:30, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

WP:INDIA Banner/Nagaland Addition

Note: {{WP India}} Project Banner with Nagaland workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Nagaland or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag ^TALK2ME 10:30, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

Copyedited

I fixed the article for many many errors. --Againme (talk) 21:31, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

supranaga

huli and naga were two brothers who killed surpanakha — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.56.134.80 (talk) 06:01, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

dear againme... maybe your should take out the modernity-christianity crap this is disgusting.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.43.195.27 (talk) 10:25, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Religion

There seems to be no discussion of pre-Christian Naga religion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.213.183.249 (talk) 00:56, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

women status

The section of women is way too contradictory... they are highly respected, but must obey the men. Uh no, that's not respect. They have lots of "freedom", but have no political power... yeah, no. J — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.55.92.22 (talk) 14:17, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Naga

Your attribution is fringe and I do not see WP:RS. Naga has been used by Indic speakers for like at least 4000 years to refer to people they consider "savages". You're quoting British Raj-era fringe stuff, engaging in WP:SYNTH, and generally not providing Wikipedic level material. Ogress 19:33, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Also, no, if you are reverted you have the burden of proof, I don't have to disprove you, you have to demonstrate the material is Wikipedic. Ogress 19:37, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Change title to Nagas

I think it is more appropriate to say Nagas rather than Naga people. For example, we don't say India people or Indian people. A single Indian sufficed the meaning. KakhoSimpson (talk) 15:13, 2 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Naga people. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111030111232/http://nagaland.nic.in/potential/tourism.htm to http://nagaland.nic.in/potential/tourism.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:42, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Naga people. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091003160500/http://globalpolitician.com/22018-india to http://www.globalpolitician.com/22018-india
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091227114723/http://www.morungexpress.com/political_affairs/13120.html to http://www.morungexpress.com/political_affairs/13120.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090619070932/http://nagaland.nic.in/profile/arts/arts.htm to http://nagaland.nic.in/profile/arts/arts.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:18, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Infobox image

@Zapnath9:, please explain here why you think that the infobox image is inappropriate. You have mentioned "Edited in England" in your edit summary, do you mean that any image edited by a person in England is unsuitable for this page? Why? I hope you realize that Wikipedia has contributors from all over the world. If you can't get past the nationality of your fellow editors, then you won't be able to collaborate with them on this project. Please provide an explanation that is completely based on the merits of the image as to why you'd like to see the image removed from this page. —Gazoth (talk) 02:47, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

The matter of fact is that Thangkuls are not Nagas from Nagaland due to political and border issues. Therefore, main photo display credit should be given to one of the Naga tribes from Nagaland and not Manipur. Edited in England. -- @Zapnath9: — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zapnath9 (talk • contribs) 02:52, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Can you provide a reliable source for your claim? Tangkhuls have been mentioned as a Naga tribe on this very page. Please sign your messages on the talk page with four tildes ~~~~, which will insert your name and the current time in UTC. Please indent your messages by prefixing an extra colon for a threaded discussion format. —Gazoth (talk) 03:04, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Forgot to ping, Zapnath9 —Gazoth (talk) 03:06, 16 June 2018 (UTC)

Proposal for merger

I propose merging https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naga_cuisine#Dishes with this article as there is a clear overlap and it will help editors.

There is a clear overlap, but the article on Naga cuisines has few if any sources and is written mostly from personal experience. Many texts on this subject exist only in print and oral tradition, and I would ask editors to resist the urge to broadly challenge unsourced content if it's not contested on factual grounds. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.89.179.154 (talk) 10:47, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 30 May 2020

Pokemonlegendworld (talk) 00:05, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

 Not done: as you have not requested a change.
Please request your change in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ".
Please also cite reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article. - Arjayay (talk) 08:34, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Head hunting

Why no mention? It was apparently an important part of their culture. 104.153.40.58 (talk) 00:11, 24 December 2021 (UTC)