Talk:Mamluk architecture

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Arab world Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arab world, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Arab world on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Arab worldWikipedia:WikiProject Arab worldTemplate:WikiProject Arab worldArab world articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Egypt Low‑importance

	Egypt portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egypt on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject EgyptTemplate:WikiProject EgyptEgypt articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArtsWikipedia:WikiProject ArtsTemplate:WikiProject ArtsWikiProject Arts articles

Bot-detected possible copyvio

Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

The first version of this article, largely unsourced, was through cut-and-paste from this version of the article on Islamic architecture, with the intent of expanding and adding sources. MadmanBot picked up what seemed like duplication from http://www.essential-architecture.com/STYLE/STY-Muslim-Mamluks.htm. A comparison does indeed show considerable overlap between the article and the website. It is not obvious who is copying who... I would have no objection to this version being deleted if there is any copyright concern. I might start a new version using sources and avoiding copyright problems. The issue is more what to do with the content in Islamic architecture, which comes from this edit on 1 December 2006 from an editor who has not been active for a few years. Aymatth2 (talk) 00:36, 18 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

It seems likely that the www.essential-architecture.com website is copying Wikipedia, rather than the other way around, and should perhaps be added to a list of sites the bot should skip. Comparing the articles on Sassanid architecture, essential-architecture is very similar to the 5 March 2006 WP version, mainly written by User:Amir85. The 28 September 2005 WP version is considerably shorter. It is possible that Amir85 made the article by copying a few paragraphs from essential-architecture, then some months later added the remaining paragraphs. It seems more likely that essential-architecture took a copy from WP after March 2006. Some other random (not selective) comparisons between essential-architecture and WP are listed below. None of the WP articles acknowledge essential-architecture as a source. If WP is copying essential-architecture rather than vice-versa, we have a very serious problem with widespread copyright violations. Aymatth2 (talk) 13:20, 18 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

The essential-architecture.com site is copying Wikipedia, the bot quite frequently makes mistakes like this. I'll mark it as a false positive. Hut 8.5 20:07, 22 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Add topic