Talk:Longus

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Greece Low‑importance

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greek people on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Two Articles in One?

Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I don't want to immediately edit this page (though if no interest/argument is made against my doing so, I shall), but surely the entry for Daphnis and Chloe should be entirely separate from this entry on Longus himself (much as with Xenophon of Ephesus and his Ephesian Tale)? -> Wiper 17:18, 22 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

I agree, and as this posting has attracted no comment, am proceeding on that basis. Neddyseagoon - talk 17:41, 14 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Copyright violation

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This article appears to have been copied from http://54.1911encyclopedia.org/L/LO/LONGUS.htm. The content on that page comes from the 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica. The terms of use on the website say:

"Although linking to this site is encouraged, reproducing Contents on another site or redistributing Contents is forbidden. Taking Contents from this site and editing it and posting it on another site is forbidden and will result in swift legal action. You may not copy, modify, publish, transmit, participate in the transfer or sale of, reproduce, create new works from, distribute, perform, display, or in any way exploit, any of the Contents of this site in whole or in part."

—MementoVivere 09:59, 11 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

You only get a copyright on the material if you add creative input; that website didn't. It is not in any way shape or form a copyright violation. I doubt that license would hold as binding in the US, and even if it did, it would only bind the copier, not Wikimedia.--Prosfilaes (talk) 01:50, 17 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

"first" word or LAST word?

Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The second paragraph begins: "It has been suggested that the name Longus is merely a misinterpretation of the first word of Daphnis and Chloe's title" - but surely this should read "the last word" (transliterated as logos)? (That is what the footnote on the page for Daphnis and Chloe" reads.) Mastakos (talk) 01:13, 11 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic