Talk:Killing of James Mincey Jr.
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Mandarax in topic Did you know nomination
While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by Mandarax (talk) 07:25, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Sorry, Elleeit, but it currently isn't eligible. Please feel free to renominate if you're able to expand it five times or get it to GA status. If you do, be sure to submit within a week of that happening.
( )
- ... that after the Killing of James Mincey Jr. and others by chokeholds, then LAPD Police Chief Daryl Gates made false and racially insensitive comments about Black people? Source: [1] "Chief Gates thought he was showing "great sensitivity" when he asked his aides to confirm his "hunch" that blacks might not recover as quickly as whites from carotid chokeholds. "We may be finding that in some blacks when it (the choke hold) is applied, the veins and arteries do not open as fast as they do in normal people.""
Created by Elleeit (talk). Self-nominated at 02:39, 27 July 2021 (UTC).
- Hi Elleeit, unfortunately this article is not eligible for DYK. Per the eligibility criteria it must have been created or significantly expanded in the past seven days. While there is sometimes some leeway given on this rule this article was created on 30 April and not significantly changed since. You are welcome to bring it back if it can be expanded more than five times in length or if it becomes a Good Article - Dumelow (talk) 05:27, 27 July 2021 (UTC)