Talk:Jim Prior

"... must be removed immediately"

In bold letters in the article, "must be removed immediately"!!!

Since 2008!!! :) --Wiskeps (talk) 07:46, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Is there any contentious material then? It's a standard hatnote calling for more sources - when the call is on a BLP article it will add the requirement for immediate removal of anything contentious. Fwiw I don't see anything I regard as falling into that category - do you? If you do, remove stuff. If you don't then perhaps you'd like to see if you can find some sources on Prior to add - he's probably in Who's Who I imagine. Blue Square Thing (talk) 16:12, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Picture?

Anyone has a free picture of him? --Lgriot (talk) 12:16, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jim Prior. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111001050259/http://www.thepost.ie/archives/2006/0702/charity-queens-and-their-subjects-15305.html to http://www.thepost.ie/archives/2006/0702/charity-queens-and-their-subjects-15305.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:16, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

Article title

I strongly recommend the retitling of this article as James Prior, per WP:COMMONNAME. As someone who lived through Prior's time in the Thatcher cabinets, I can assure all editors that the media referred to him as "James" and not "Jim". The usage is similar to that of James Callaghan, where only in personal informal contexts, such as Richard Crossman's diary, was that man referred to as "Jim". Harfarhs (talk) 08:51, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Tend to agree. Similar situation with Ted Heath? Martinevans123 (talk) 10:00, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

I would say it's similar, yes. The main contrast that comes to my mind is with Tom King, whom I never heard or saw referred to as "Thomas". (There is an interesting note on the relative public acceptability of full forms against short forms – which would I think merit a full-scale discussion in a book on first names, if it hasn't already – in First Names First by Leslie Dunkling.) I've altered the article lead on this matter - perhaps "sometimes" isn't the right word either, but I think it's more accurate than "usually". Harfarhs (talk) 13:26, 11 March 2021 (UTC)