This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ice Hockey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of ice hockey on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ice HockeyWikipedia:WikiProject Ice HockeyTemplate:WikiProject Ice HockeyIce Hockey articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
So you knew this was wrong a year ago and just left the false info there? The reference you referred too was incorrect and you acknowledged that so you should have removed it. Also the link you shared doesn't mention a date or the name of a law firm so what was written is completely based off someone's misinterpretation of something they read, absolutely no fact to it. Debdeb18 (talk) 22:15, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 3 months ago12 comments6 people in discussion
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
As an addendum, this article is clearly the larger and more finely detailed of the two, so I presume the ideal option would be for this article to absorb the other. KirkCliff2 (talk) 18:58, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
This article is a bit disorganized, but it makes passing mention of other incidents, though they can easily be incorporated into one section of the article to highlight past controversies, yes? KirkCliff2 (talk) 19:08, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
I think it would make sense to, as relevant, include them in a "Background" section and some sort of "other incidents" section. It's my general understanding that revelations of the 2018 assault were the driving force behind most other events (investigations, hearings, other cases coming to light). Wrackingtalk!19:18, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Both subjects pass WP:GNG as standalone articles. More news has been released today for the 2018 team. I suggest waiting to see what comes of recent announcements.Flibirigit (talk) 20:41, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
I think the reasoning wouldn't be GNG but instead WP:OVERLAP. It's unclear to me how each article is substantively separate from the other. This could possibly be resolved by more clearly defining the scope of each article (eg 2018 Hockey Canada controversy and sexual assault is in-depth of that incident, while this page includes the 2018 events as a section in a summary-style review). Wrackingtalk!21:10, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Merging seems logical for the points raised by Wracking, I don’t really see how these two articles are substantively different enough from each other to stand by themselves. TheKip02:24, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
.svg){kind=small}
Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 18:20, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
