This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Editing dispute
editThere's a few reasons for reverting the content, and I wanted to open a discussion about this. First, the hatnote is completely unnecessary, per WP:NAMB. This isn't an ambiguous title, so the hatnote isn't needed. Secondly, blogs from companied like this are not reliable sources for third-party content like this. - SudoGhost 00:22, 19 October 2012 (UTC)