Talk:Collar day
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Collar day. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20060925040501/http://www.cam.ac.uk/societies/cuhags/info/days.htm to http://www.cam.ac.uk/societies/cuhags/info/days.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:59, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Collar day. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060925040501/http://www.cam.ac.uk/societies/cuhags/info/days.htm to http://www.cam.ac.uk/societies/cuhags/info/days.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:53, 27 November 2016 (UTC)
Collars at the Queen’s Jubilee Birthday Parade
editPrince Charles, Prince William and the Princess Royal were all wearing collars while mounted for the Queen’s Platinum Jubilee Birthday Parade on Thursday 2nd June 2022. Anyone know why/how, please, as the text of this article suggests they are not worn on that specific occasion! CharlesSpencer (talk) 08:00, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
- The Birthday Parade took place on June 2nd (the anniversary of the Queen's coronation). That is one of the Collar Days. It wasn't worn because of the parade or the jubilee. The collar can be worn on horseback and the false information saying it can't was removed. Master Editor 10 (talk) 20:29, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Note indicators should be fixed
editThere are both a [[1]] "note" and a [[1]] "reference". This is missleading. But I don't know how to fix this technically (wikicode). In other page "notes" have indicators like [[a]]. Can someone fix it? Meridiana solare (talk) 07:05, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
- I fixed it. Now the footnotes use letters while the references use numbers. Master Editor 10 (talk) 15:47, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you. Meridiana solare (talk) 15:52, 7 October 2022 (UTC)