Talk:Chiclayo

Mistakes

Chiclayo is a metropolitan area, 910 000 hab, chiclayo city 546 000 hab. (2005)

Central chiclayo: 251,406 inhabiting. J.L.Ortiz:153,472 inhabiting. The victory: 75,729 inhabiting, Pimentel 29,622 inhabiting.((Pepper box area industrial, town than gum urbanizaciones : the palms , the cedar , universities and schools : san agustin , Chinese , regimental etc. Pomalca 23,134 (saman, the vegas , she jumps one and the same Pomalca ) Reque 12,690 inhabiting ( south chosica northern the populations through bridge reque ) Chiclayo city town total : 546,054 inhabiting —Preceding unsigned comment added by PeruChiclayo (talk • contribs) 09:38, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

File:Aeropuertochiclayo.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Aeropuertochiclayo.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 13 April 2012 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Aeropuertochiclayo.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:37, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Needs work on grammar

Needs work on grammar. Some of this is difficult to understand; apparently it's a translation from Spanish. 16:36, 10 May 2015 (UTC)

Not just that, but multiple translations of the Spanish by multiple editors who didn't see that the same phrases had already been brought across. I am working on this in a few sections. Separately, I did find the "deleted" photo of the airport terminal in the Commons and inserted it. The city seal was also deleted, along with many other diagrams submitted by a single Wikipedian without proper documentation that we are authorized to have it; the section describing the seal is poor without the image itself to look at. Spike-from-NH (talk) 03:35, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Having done several edits to remove the repetition, I finally used Google to see if there were some reliable sources for the name of the city. It turns out that this entire article is a translation of the uncredited http://www.peruonline.eu/sida2.html (though it may be a copy of something else). Spike-from-NH (talk) 13:41, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chiclayo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130210003745/http://www.munichiclayo.gob.pe/g_urbanismo/ to http://www.munichiclayo.gob.pe/g_urbanismo/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080423164200/http://desa.inei.gob.pe/mapas/bid/ to http://desa.inei.gob.pe/mapas/bid/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:31, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chiclayo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060228202527/http://www.gobiernochiclayo.gob.pe/ to http://www.gobiernochiclayo.gob.pe/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:09, 4 August 2017 (UTC)