Talk:BrewDog
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 28 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Controversies section
editAs is often the case with such sections, this is a real mixture, in this case of marketing, product, copyright, employee, business practices... While they may relate to an underlying corporate personality, separating it into themed sections would probably aid understanding. Jontel (talk) 10:25, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
- I would argue seeing as how the company has marketed itself in the past and trying to stand out as different from larger breweries their actions are relevant to how they publicly present themselves. RLS 84 (talk) 20:23, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
- I would be in favor of reducing it, just enough that it doesn't outgrow the history. It's just a company, and many of those controversies seem to be plain and simple shock advertising, which means this article relays the company's advertising content way too much... Finersinger (talk) 01:17, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
History section
editAs above, this could also be usefully divided into financing, production, retail and international. Jontel (talk) 13:52, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Introduction
editIt seems very unusual to me that even in the opening paragraph of this article it is already mentioned that "The company has been involved in a number of controversies. These have focused on its treatment of employees, its use of unethical business practices, and hypocrisy in regards to its anti-establishment branding."
I would argue this is hardly such a defining characteristic of this company that it belongs in the introductory paragraph. Most multinational companies have experienced some type of controversy. Where is such a mention in the introductory paragraph of McDonalds, Shell, Coca Cola?51.9.166.169 (talk) 11:21, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- I agree with this. It’s very much absent from the big conglomerates intros but for some reason seems to make the cut here. I think it’s just worthy of a separate section further down the page. 2A00:23C6:73B9:4901:AC6E:AC8E:DF:BE2A (talk) 12:42, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
Holding %
editI don’t believe from current info available the accurate shareholding % has been attributed correctly and should be updated. 2A00:23C6:73B9:4901:AC6E:AC8E:DF:BE2A (talk) 12:43, 5 October 2024 (UTC)