This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Is user Barrmac Barr McClelland? Seems so, given his interest in this entry and in the entry of Jack Worthington. Worthington claims to be the son of JFK despite his family's disavowals and non-definitive DNA evidence from JFK's hair that "suggests non-paternity." Worthington seems to be a public advocate of McClelland's theory that LBJ was involved in the assassination of JFK, which is debunked at some length in Bugliosi's book on the assassination. Lippard (talk) 01:40, 25 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Why is there an asterisk after the title of his book? Just a typo? I don't see a follow-up footnote at the bottom of the page, and even if I did, is that Wikipedia protocol? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.170.46.218 (talk) 03:58, 10 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 9 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
"It was not until the arrival of President Jimmy Carter that the oil depletion allowance was removed." Would be good to have cite on this. There is still a depletion deduction for oil along with other extracted items. What is being referred to in this sentence? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peter Reilly (talk • contribs) 11:42, 30 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
The assertion here is that JFK was going to repeal the allowance, but that rich Texan oilmen in cahoots with LBJ had him killed in order to keep the allowance in place. I have removed the entire paragraph since a fringe claim like this needs to be discussed in reliable secondary sources before it can be included. - Location (talk) 00:12, 31 December 2014 (UTC)Reply
