Talk:AFC Fylde

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on A.F.C. Fylde. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.afcfylde.co.uk/info/history.php
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nwcfl.co.uk/News-August.htm
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.afcfylde.co.uk/results/reports.php?m=103
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.nwcfl.co.uk/News-July.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110717020304/http://www.thenonleaguefootballpaper.com/article.asp?aid=2220&jid=58&sud=471 to http://www.thenonleaguefootballpaper.com/article.asp?aid=2220&jid=58&sud=471

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:20, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on A.F.C. Fylde. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071212180144/http://www.afcfylde.co.uk/info/history.php to http://www.afcfylde.co.uk/info/history.php
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070816013923/http://www.nwcfl.co.uk/News-August.htm to http://www.nwcfl.co.uk/News-August.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070720024508/http://www.nwcfl.co.uk/News-July.htm to http://www.nwcfl.co.uk/News-July.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:04, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on A.F.C. Fylde. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080201222511/http://www.afcfylde.co.uk/results/reports.php?m=103 to http://www.afcfylde.co.uk/results/reports.php?m=103
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.nonleaguegrounds.fotopic.net/p52448013.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:05, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Neutral POV - Controversies and criticisms

The controversies and criticisms seems to be WP:Undue to me. I can't think of any other article - even Manchester City F.C. (which has had significant criticism for their ownership), which includes this section for a club article. The section reads to me as someone trying to push an agenda. The point on poor attendances is odd - we don't include it for their opponents Salford or any other club. I think that could be moved to the 2019 play-off final page or removed entirely as it looks poorly sourced. The work-life balance barely seems relevant either. Could we either condense the section or move some of the info elsewhere? Michaeldble (talk) 13:59, 18 May 2023 (UTC)