Talk:76th Academy Awards

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Featured list76th Academy Awards is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured list on March 11, 2024.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 29, 2013Peer reviewNot reviewed
August 26, 2013Featured list candidatePromoted
In the newsA news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on March 1, 2004.
Current status: Featured list

Untitled

edit

Shouldn't we also have the nominees on this page? They were all there before and simply being a nominee is also considered to be an honor. --mav 11:02, 1 Mar 2004 (UTC)

There is a separate page for that. Link is near the end of the page. --Cantus

Trademark

edit

All these trademark symbols and disclaimers are unnecessary and ugly. Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Academy Awards for more discussion. --ESP 21:40, 1 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Image

edit

The image for the official poster isn't showing up--anybody know why? Also, anybody think we should use the poster of the Best Picture instead, to sort of date the year at a glance? jengod 02:05, Mar 2, 2004 (UTC)



Somebody should figure out what the following paragraph from the article actually means, and fix it.

The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King swept all 11 categories in which it was nominated. It matched the record 11 wins of Titanic and Ben-Hur and became only the third movie to sweep every nominated category, following Gigi and The Last Emperor, which both went nine-for-nine.

According to the table lower in the article, Monster also won every nominated category this year. Should it only include movies with more than one nomination? More than 5 nominations? Cwitty 22:19, 2 Mar 2004 (UTC)


On my IE for PC, there's a funny little space between the bottom of the poster and the border around it. Any ideas? jengod 00:35, Mar 6, 2004 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Oscars2003.JPG

edit
 

Image:Oscars2003.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 10:41, 7 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress

edit

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Academy Awards which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 13:14, 4 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 76th Academy Awards. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:14, 19 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Films with multiple nominations and awards

edit

I don't know if this is normal, but I think that the "Films with multiple nominations and awards" section needs fixing. No offense to anyone, but there's a huge space between the heading and the table, and the table looks really weird and messed up, and that is beyond my ability to fix. Could somebody please fix it? Thank you very much.