Talk:2011–12 Serbian SuperLiga
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Kits/sponsors
editIs there any chance of WP:V verifying the given kit and sponsor information given in the article? If not, it should be removed, especialy since it has been tagged as unverified for quite some time now. If, however, the given facts can be verified (and may it be just on a club-by-club basis), it should be moved to a separate subsection, similar to the likes of the Premier League, Bundesliga or La Liga articles. --Soccer-holicI hear voices in my head... 13:50, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on 2011–12 Serbian SuperLiga. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120515094422/http://fkhajduk.rs/?page_id=34 to http://fkhajduk.rs/?page_id=34
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131207221415/http://superliga.rs/index.php?option=com_content&view=frontpage&Itemid=28 to http://www.superliga.rs/index.php?option=com_content&view=frontpage&Itemid=28
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:32, 19 June 2017 (UTC)