Talk:2003 Bawean incident
Latest comment: 1 year ago by SunDawn in topic Feedback from New Page Review process
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2003 Bawean incident article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Primary Source is a blog
editA lot of this looks like a close paraphrase or copy of the english google translation of a blog. This needs to be significantly reworded and a reliable source needs to be cited instead of a self-published, unreliable blog. See WP:RS. --Dual Freq (talk) 21:14, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- I trimmed out the material cited solely by the blogspot.com blog which was mostly citing a unneeded, one-sided, play by play of the interception. I'm not against readding some of the material if it can be reliably sourced and vital to the article, but an extremely detailed account by a single side of the interception is not needed. --Dual Freq (talk) 13:57, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
Feedback from New Page Review process
editI left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!