skip to main content
10.1145/3702879.3702887acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiotcctConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Online doctor-patient matching method based on patient consensus and doctor fairness

Published: 11 December 2024 Publication History

Abstract

With the rapid development of Internet and smart medicine, online medical platform has gradually become an important channel to meet the basic medical needs of the public. How to meet the needs of patients and achieve precise matching between doctors and patients is an urgent problem to be solved. At the same time, it is necessary to ensure the fairness of doctors and avoid wasting medical resources in the process of doctor-patient matching. Therefore, we propose an online doctor-patient matching method based on patient consensus and doctor fairness to assist online medical platforms in making decisions. Firstly, we build the consensus degree of patients based on the feature information of doctors and the patient demands. Then, we use the Rawlsian maximin fairness to measure doctor fairness and construct a doctor-patient matching model with minimizing patient risk losses and maximizing doctor fairness. This model can obtain the doctor-patient matching results for the online medical platform. Finally, a case study of the HaoDaiFu online medical platform verify the effectiveness of the proposed doctor-patient matching method.

References

[1]
Yang Y., Luo S.C., Fan J., Zhou X.Y., Fu C.Y. and Tang G.C. 2019. Study on specialist outpatient matching appointment and the balance matching model. Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, vol. 37, pp. 20-39.
[2]
Chen X., Sun H. and Liang H.M. 2019. A Matching Method for Healthcare Service Supply and Demand Considering Patients' Appointment Behavior with Diversified Demand. Operations Research and Management Science, vol. 28 (2), pp. 90-97.
[3]
Gale D. and Shapley L.S. 1962. College admissions and the stability of marriage. The American Mathematical Monthly, vol. 69, pp. 9-15.
[4]
Zhang F.Y. and Li X.H. 2024. Knowledge-enhanced online doctor recommendation framework based on knowledge graph and joint learning. Information Sciences, vol. 662, pp. 120268.
[5]
Güneş E., Yaman H., Çekyay B. and Verter V. 2014. Matching patient and physician preferences in designing a primary care facility network. Journal of the Operational Research Society, vol. 65, pp. 483-496.
[6]
Li B., Zhang Y.X. and Xu Z.S. 2020. The medical treatment service matching based on the probabilistic linguistic term sets with unknown attribute weights. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, vol. 22, pp. 1487-1505.
[7]
Zhou S.H., Li D.B. and Yin Y. 2021. Coordinated appointment scheduling with multiple providers and patient-and-physician matching cost in specialty care. Omega, vol. 101, pp. 102285.
[8]
Wang Y.F., Ma W.Z., Zhang M., Liu Y.Q. and Ma S.P. 2023. A Survey on the Fairness of Recommender Systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, vol. 41, pp. 1-43.
[9]
Wu H.L., Ma C., Mitra B., Diaz F. and Liu X. 2022. A multi-objective optimization framework for multi-stakeholder fairness-aware recommendation. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, vol. 41, pp. 1-29.
[10]
Chen X., Zhao L., Liang H.M. and Lai K.K. 2019. Matching patients and healthcare service providers: a novel two-stage method based on knowledge rules and OWA-NSGA-II algorithm. Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, vol. 37, pp. 221-247.
[11]
Rawls J. 2020. A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press.
[12]
Liao H.C., Xu Z.S., Zeng X.J. and Merigó J.M. 2015. Qualitative decision making with correlation coefficients of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 76, pp. 127-138.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
IoTCCT '24: Proceedings of the 2024 2nd International Conference on Internet of Things and Cloud Computing Technology
September 2024
384 pages
ISBN:9798400710148
DOI:10.1145/3702879
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 11 December 2024

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Doctor fairness
  2. Doctor-patient matching
  3. Online medical platform
  4. Patient consensus
  5. Smart health

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

IoTCCT 2024

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 38
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)38
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)11
Reflects downloads up to 05 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Full Text

View this article in Full Text.

Full Text

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media