skip to main content
10.1145/3055601.3055613acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescpsweekConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Spatio-Temporal Modeling of Criminal Activity

Published: 18 April 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Accurate crime forecasting can allow law enforcement to more effectively plan their resource allocation such as patrol routes and placements. We study the effectiveness of traditional regression approaches in forecasting crime occurrences in Portland, Oregon. We divide the area of interest into equally spaced cells and investigate the spatial autocorrelation between the crime occurrence rates of neighboring cells. We also attempt to use neighboring cells' information in the regression models along with the cell's own time series to enhance the forecast results. Our results show that regression is a promising method that outperforms a moving window averaging method, especially when the future horizon to be predicted increases. However, addition of neighborhood cells decreased the quality of predictions, suggesting that spatial correlation in crime is more complex than geographical neighborhood. We also explore a possibility of connection of criminal activities and popularity of crime incidents in Portland on the Web, and discuss future directions we will take to improve crime prediction.

References

[1]
Spencer Chainey, Lisa Tompson, and Sebastian Uhlig. 2008. The utility of hotspot mapping for predicting spatial patterns of crime. Security Journal 21, 1-2 (2008), 4--28.
[2]
John Eck, Spencer Chainey, James Cameron, and R Wilson. 2005. Mapping crime: Understanding hotspots. (2005).
[3]
Timothy Hart and Paul Zandbergen. 2014. Kernel density estimation and hotspot mapping: examining the influence of interpolation method, grid cell size, and bandwidth on crime forecasting. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management 37, 2 (2014), 305--323.
[4]
Arthur E Hoerl and Robert W Kennard. 1970. Ridge regression: Biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems. Technometrics 12, 1 (1970), 55--67.
[5]
Joel M Hunt. 2016. Do crime hot spots move? Exploring the effects of the modifiable areal unit problem and modifiable temporal unit problem on crime hot spot stability. Ph.D. Dissertation. AMERICAN UNIVERSITY.
[6]
Shane D Johnson and Kate J Bowers. 2004. The burglary as clue to the future: The beginnings of prospective hot-spotting. European Journal of Criminology 1, 2 (2004), 237--255.
[7]
M Vijaya Kumar and C Chandrasekar. 2011. Spatial clustering simulation on analysis of spatialtemporal crime hotspot for predicting crime activities. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies 2, 6 (2011), 2864--2867.
[8]
Patrick AP Moran. 1948. The interpretation of statistical maps. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 10, 2 (1948), 243--251.
[9]
National Institute of Crime. Real-Time Crime Forecasting Challenge. 2016. (2016).
[10]
Robert Tibshirani. 1996. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) (1996), 267--288.
[11]
Michael Townsley, Ross Homel, and Janet Chaseling. 2003. Infectious burglaries: A test of the near repeat hypothesis. The British Journal of Criminology (2003), 615--633.
[12]
Xiaofeng Wang, Matthew S Gerber, and Donald E Brown. 2012. Automatic crime prediction using events extracted from twitter posts. In International Conference on Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural Modeling, and Prediction. Springer, 231--238.
[13]
Chung-Hsien Yu, Wei Ding, Ping Chen, and Melissa Morabito. 2014. Crime forecasting using spatio-temporal pattern with ensemble learning. In Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. Springer, 174--185.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
SocialSens'17: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Social Sensing
April 2017
97 pages
ISBN:9781450349772
DOI:10.1145/3055601
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 18 April 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Crime Prediction
  2. Social Media Crime Anycasting
  3. Spatial Correlation
  4. Time Series
  5. Urban Sensing

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Funding Sources

Conference

CPS Week '17
Sponsor:
CPS Week '17: Cyber Physical Systems Week 2017
April 18 - 21, 2017
PA, Pittsburgh, USA

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)57
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)6
Reflects downloads up to 26 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media