skip to main content
research-article

Usability studies and the Hawthorne effect

Published: 01 May 2007 Publication History

Abstract

This paper provides a brief review of the Hawthorne effect, a discussion of how this effect relates to usability studies, and help for practitioners in defending their studies against criticisms made on the basis of this effect.

References

[1]
Adair, G. (1984). The Hawthorne effect: A reconsideration of the methodological artifact. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(2), 334--5.
[2]
Carey, A. (1967). The Hawthorne Studies: A radical criticism. American Sociological Review, 32, 403--16.
[3]
CIF v2.02 (2002). Common Industry Format for usability test reports. Retrieved June 22, 2002, from http://zing.ncsl.nist.gov/iusr/overview.html.
[4]
Draper, S. (2006). The Hawthorne, Pygmalion, placebo and other effects of expectation: some notes. Retrieved January 1, 2007, from http://www.psy.gla.ac.uk/~steve/hawth.html.
[5]
Gillespie, R. (1991). Manufacturing knowledge: a history of the Hawthorne experiments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[6]
International Standards Organization (1998). Definition: 9241-11:1998. Retrieved April 27, 2002, from http://www.iso.ch.
[7]
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[8]
Khan Research Group (2000). Validity 101 -- What it is, why it is essential, where others fail, and how we succeed. Retrieved January 18, 2007, from http://www.webehavior.com/validity101.htm.
[9]
Kolata, G. (1998). Scientific Myths That Are Too Good to Die. New York Times. Retrieved January 18, 2007, from http://www.nytimes.com/library/review/120698science-myths-review.html.
[10]
Mayo, E. (1933). The human problems of an industrial civilization. New York: MacMillan.
[11]
Norman, D. A. (1983). Some observations on mental models. In: Gentner, D. & Stevens, A., L. Mental Models. London: Erlbaum.
[12]
Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.
[13]
Parsons, H. M. (1974). What happened at Hawthorne? Science, 183(4128), 922--32.
[14]
Preece, J., Rogers, Y., Sharp, H., Benyon, D., Holland, S. & Carey, T. (1994). Human-computer interaction. Wokingham: Addison Wesley.
[15]
Raskin, J. (1994). Intuitive equals familiar. Communications of the ACM, 37(9), 17.
[16]
Rice, B. (1982). The Hawthorne defect: Persistence of a flawed theory. Psychology Today, 16(2), 70--4.
[17]
Sasse, M. A. (1997). Eliciting and Describing Users' Models of Computer Systems. PhD Thesis. Birmingham University, UK.
[18]
Snow, C. E. (1927). Research on industrial illumination: A discussion of the relation of illumination intensity to productive efficiency. The Tech Engineering News, 257--82.
[19]
Sonnenfeld, J. (1983) Commentary: Academic Learning, Worker Learning, and the Hawthorne Studies, Social Forces, 61(3), 904--9.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Journal of Usability Studies
Journal of Usability Studies  Volume 2, Issue 3
May 2007
53 pages

Publisher

Usability Professionals' Association

Bloomingdale, IL

Publication History

Published: 01 May 2007
Published in JUS Volume 2, Issue 3

Author Tags

  1. Hawthorne effect
  2. experimenter effects
  3. usability study

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)6
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 01 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media