skip to main content
10.3115/980845.980953dlproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaclConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free access

Pseudo-projectivity: a polynomially parsable non-projective dependency grammar

Published: 10 August 1998 Publication History
First page of PDF

References

[1]
Norbert Bröker and Peter Neuhaus. 1997. The complexity of recognition of linguistically adequate dependency grammars. In 35th Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'97), Madrid, Spain. ACL.
[2]
M. Collins. 1997. Three generative, lexicalised models for statistical parsing. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Madrid, Spain, July.
[3]
Jason M. Eisner. 1996. Three new probabilistic models for dependency parsing: An exploration. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING'96), Copenhagen.
[4]
Haim Gaifman. 1965. Dependency systems and phrase-structure systems. Information and Control, 8:304--337.
[5]
Richard Hudson. 1990. English Word Grammar. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, RU.
[6]
Richard Hudson. unpublished. Discontinuity. e-preprint (ftp.phon.ucl.ac.uk).
[7]
Aravind K. Joshi, Leon Levy, and M Takahashi. 1975. Tree adjunct grammars. J. Comput. Syst. Sci., 10:136--163.
[8]
Jürgen Kunze. 1968. The treatment of non-projective structures in the syntactic analysis and synthesis of english and german. Computational Linguistics, 7:67--77.
[9]
Yves Lecerf. 1960. Programme des conflits, modèle des conflits. Bulletin bimestriel de I'ATALA, 4, 5.
[10]
Vicenzo Lombardi. 1996. An Earley-style parser for dependency grammars. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING'96), Copenhagen.
[11]
Solomon Marcus. 1965. Sur la notion de projectivité. Zeitschr. f. math. Logik und Grundlagen d. Math., 11:181--192.
[12]
Igor A. Mel'čuk. 1988. Dependency Syntax: Theory and Practice. State University of New York Press, New York.
[13]
Alexis Nasr. 1995. A formalism and a parser for lexicalised dependency grammars. In 4th International Workshop on Parsing Technologies, pages 186--195, Prague.
[14]
Alexis Nasr. 1996. Un système de reformulation automatique de phrases fondé sur la Théorie Sens-Texte: application aux langues contrôlées. Ph.D. thesis, Université Paris 7.
[15]
Michael Reape. 1990. Getting things in order. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Discontinuous Constituents, Tilburg, Holland.
[16]
Jane J. Robinson. 1970. Dependency structures and transformational rules. Language, 46(2):259--285.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image DL Hosted proceedings
ACL '98/COLING '98: Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics - Volume 1
August 1998
768 pages

Sponsors

  • Government of Canada
  • Université de Montréal

Publisher

Association for Computational Linguistics

United States

Publication History

Published: 10 August 1998

Qualifiers

  • Article

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 85 of 443 submissions, 19%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)45
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
Reflects downloads up to 03 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media