skip to main content
article

Expecting the unexpected: effects of data collection design choices on the quality of crowdsourced user-generated content

Published: 01 June 2019 Publication History

Abstract

As crowdsourced user-generated content becomes an important source of data for organizations, a pressing question is how to ensure that data contributed by ordinary people outside of traditional organizational boundaries is of suitable quality to be useful for both known and unanticipated purposes. This research examines the impact of different information quality management strategies, and corresponding data collection design choices, on key dimensions of information quality in crowdsourced user-generated content. We conceptualize a contributor-centric information quality management approach focusing on instance-based data collection. We contrast it with the traditional consumer-centric fitness-for- use conceptualization of inf or ma tio n quality that emphasizes class-based data collection. We present laboratory and field experiments conducted in a citizen science domain that demonstrate trade-offs between the quality dimensions of accuracy, completeness (including discoveries), and precision between the two information management approaches and their corresponding data collection designs. Specifically, we show that instance-based data collection results in higher accuracy, dataset completeness, and number of discoveries, but this comes at the expense of lower precision. We further validate the practical value of the instance-based approach by conducting an applicability check with potential data consumers (scientists, in our context of citizen science). In a follow-up study, we show, using human experts and supervised machine learning techniques, that substantial precision gains on instance-based data can be achieved with post-processing. We conclude by discussing the benefits and limitations of different information quality and data collection design choices for information quality in crowdsourced user-generated content.

References

[1]
Abbasi, A., Zhou, Y., Deng, S., and Zhang, P. 2018. "Text Analytics to Support Sense-Making in Social Media: A Language-Action Perspective," MIS Quarterly (42:2), pp. 1-38.
[2]
Allen, G., and Parsons, J. 2010. "Is Query Reuse Potentially Harmful? Anchoring and Adjustment in Adapting Existing Database Queries," Information Systems Research (21:1), pp. 56-77.
[3]
Andriole, S. J. 2010. "Business Impact of Web 2.0 Technologies," Communications of the ACM (53:12), pp. 67-79.
[4]
Batini, C., Cappiello, C., Francalanci, C., and Maurino, A. 2009. "Methodologies for Data Quality Assessment and Improvement," Computing Surveys (41:3), pp. 1-52.
[5]
Bell, B. F. 1981. "When Is an Animal, Not an Animal?," Journal of Biological Education (15:3), pp. 213-218.
[6]
Berlin, B., Breedlove, D. E., and Raven, P. H. 1966. "Folk Taxonomies and Biological Classification," Science (154:3746), pp. 273-275.
[7]
Boakes, E. H., McGowan, P. J., Fuller, R. A., Chang-Qing, D., Clark, N. E., O'Connor, K., and Mace, G. M. 2010. "Distorted Views of Biodiversity: Spatial and Temporal Bias in Species Occurrence Data," PLoS Biology (8:6), pp. 1-11.
[8]
Bonney, R., Cooper, C. B., Dickinson, J., Kelling, S., Phillips, T., Rosenberg, K. V., and Shirk, J. 2009. "Citizen Science: A Developing Tool for Expanding Science Knowledge and Scientific Literacy," BioScience (59:11), pp. 977-984.
[9]
Brabham, D. C. 2013. Crowdsourcing, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[10]
Browne, G. J., and Ramesh, V. 2002. "Improving Information Requirements Determination: A Cognitive Perspective," Information & Management (39:8), pp. 625-645.
[11]
Brynjolfsson, E., Geva, T., and Reichman, S. 2016. "Crowd-Squared: Amplifying the Predictive Power of Search Trend Data," MIS Quarterly (40:4), pp. 941-961.
[12]
Bunge, M. 1977. Treatise on Basic Philosophy: Ontology I: The Furniture of the World, Boston: Reidel.
[13]
Burgess, H., DeBey, L., Froehlich, H., Schmidt, N., Theobald, E., Ettinger, A., HilleRisLambers, J., Tewksbury, J., and Parrish, J. 2017. "The Science of Citizen Science: Exploring Barriers to Use as a Primary Research Tool," Biological Conservation (108), pp. 113-120.
[14]
Burton-Jones, A., and Volkoff, O. 2017. "How Can We Develop Contextualized Theories of Effective Use? A Demonstration in the Context of Community-Care Electronic Health Records," Information Systems Research (28:3), pp. 468-489.
[15]
Callaghan, C. T., and Gawlik, D. E. 2015. "Efficacy of EBird Data as an Aid in Conservation Planning and Monitoring," Journal of Field Ornithology (1:1), pp. 1-7.
[16]
Chen, P. 1976. "The Entity-Relationship Model—Toward a Unified View of Data," ACM Transactions on Database Systems (1:1), pp. 9-36.
[17]
Chittilappilly, A. I., Chen, L., and Amer-Yahia, S. 2016. "A Survey of General-Purpose Crowdsourcing Techniques," IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering (28:9), pp. 2246-2266.
[18]
Clarke, R., Burton-Jones, A., and Weber, R. 2016. "On the Onto-logical Quality and Logical Quality of Conceptual-Modeling Grammars: The Need for a Dual Perspective," Information Systems Research (27:2), pp. 365-382.
[19]
Clery, D. 2011. "Galaxy Zoo Volunteers Share Pain and Glory of Research," Science (333:6039), pp. 173-175.
[20]
Clow, D., and Makriyannis, E. 2011. ISpot Analysed: Participatory Learning and Reputation, in Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, New York: ACM Press, pp. 34-43.
[21]
Cooper, A. K., Rapant, P., Hjelmager, J., Laurent, D., Iwaniak, A., Coetzee, S., Moellering, H., and Düren, U. 2011. "Extending the Formal Model of a Spatial Data Infrastructure to Include Volunteered Geographical Information," in Proceedings of the 25th International Cartographic Conference, Paris, July 3-8, Paper ID CO-120.
[22]
Culnan, M. J., McHugh, P. J., and Zubillaga, J. I. 2010. "How Large U.S. Companies Can Use Twitter and Other Social Media to Gain Business Value.," MIS Quarterly Executive (9:4), pp. 243-259.
[23]
Daniel, F., Kucherbaev, P., Cappiello, C., Benatallah, B., and Allahbakhsh, M. 2018. "Quality Control in Crowdsourcing: A Survey of Quality Attributes, Assessment Techniques, and Assurance Actions," ACM Computing Surveys (51:1), Article 7.
[24]
Deng, X., Joshi, K., and Galliers, R. D. 2016. "The Duality of Empowerment and Marginalization in Microtask Crowdsourcing: Giving Voice to the Less Powerful through Value Sensitive Design," MIS Quarterly (40:2), pp. 279-302.
[25]
Devillers, R., Stein, A., Bédard, Y., Chrisman, N., Fisher, P., and Shi, W. 2010. "Thirty Years of Research on Spatial Data Quality: Achievements, Failures, and Opportunities," Transactions in GIS (14:4), pp. 387-400.
[26]
Dewan, S., and Ramaprasad, J. 2012. "Research Note—Music Blogging, Online Sampling, and the Long Tail," Information Systems Research (23:3, Part 2), pp. 1056-1067.
[27]
Doan, A., Ramakrishnan, R., and Halevy, A. Y. 2011. "Crowd-sourcing Systems on the World-Wide Web," Communications of the ACM (54:4), pp. 86-96.
[28]
Engel, S., and Voshell, R. 2002. "Volunteer Biological Monitoring: Can It Accurately Assess the Ecological Condition of Streams?," American Entomologist (48:3), pp. 164-177.
[29]
Erickson, L., Petrick, I., and Trauth, E. 2012. "Hanging with the Right Crowd: Matching Crowdsourcing Need to Crowd Characteristics," in Proceedings of the 19th Americas Conference on Information Systems, Seattle, Washington, August 9-12.
[30]
Fielden, M. A., Chaulk, A. C., Bassett, K., Wiersma, Y. F., Erbland, M., Whitney, H., and Chapman, T. W. 2015. "Aedes Japonicus Japonicus (Diptera: Culicidae) Arrives at the Most Easterly Point in North America," The Canadian Entomologist (147:6), pp. 737-740.
[31]
Galloway, A. W. E., Tudor, M. T., and Haegen, W. M. V. 2006. "The Reliability of Citizen Science: A Case Study of Oregon White Oak Stand Surveys," Wildlife Society Bulletin (34:5), pp. 1425-1429.
[32]
Gao, G. G., Greenwood, B. N., Agarwal, R., and McCullough, J. S. 2015. "Vocal Minority and Silent Majority: How Do Online Ratings Reflect Population Perceptions of Quality?," MIS Quarterly (39:3), pp. 565-589.
[33]
Garcia-Molina, H., Joglekar, M., Marcus, A., Parameswaran, A., and Verroios, V. 2016. "Challenges in Data Crowdsourcing," IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering (28:4), pp. 901-911.
[34]
Gebauer, J., and Schober, F. 2006. "Information System Flexibility and the Cost Efficiency of Business Processes," Journal of the AIS (7:3), p. 8.
[35]
Gigerenzer, G., and Todd, P. M. 1999. Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart, New York: Oxford University Press.
[36]
Gilovich, T., Griffin, D., and Kahneman, D. 2002. Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
[37]
Goes, P. B. 2014. "Editor's Comments: Design Science Research in Top Information Systems Journals," MIS Quarterly (38:1), iii-viii.
[38]
Good, P. I. 2001. Resampling Methods: A Practical Guide to Data Analysis. Second Edition, Berlin, Germany: Springer Science & Business Media.
[39]
Goodman, J. K., and Paolacci, G. 2017. "Crowdsourcing Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research (44:1), pp. 196-210.
[40]
Gray, M. L., Suri, S., Ali, S. S., and Kulkarni, D. 2016. "The Crowd Is a Collaborative Network," in Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, New York: ACM Press, pp. 134-147.
[41]
Hackshaw, A. 2008. "Small Studies: Strengths and Limitations," European Respiratory Journal (32), pp. 1141-1143.
[42]
Harnad, S. 2005. "To Cognize Is to Categorize: Cognition Is Categorization," in Handbook of Categorization in Cognitive, H. Cohen and C. Lefebvre (eds.), Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, pp. 20-45.
[43]
Hemsley, J., and Mason, R. M. 2012. "The Nature of Knowledge in the Social Media Age: Implications for Knowledge Management Models," in Proceedings of the 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 3928-3937.
[44]
Ipeirotis, P. G., Provost, F., and Wang, J. 2010. "Quality Management on Amazon Mechanical Turk," in Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD Workshop on Human Computation, New York: ACM Press, pp. 64-67.
[45]
Johnson, S. L., Faraj, S., and Kudaravalli, S. 2014. "Emergence of Power Laws in Online Communities: The Role of Social Mechanisms and Preferential Attachment," MIS Quarterly (38:3), pp. 795-808.
[46]
Kallinikos, J., and Tempini, N. 2014. "Patient Data as Medical Facts: Social Media Practices as a Foundation for Medical Knowledge Creation," Information Systems Research (25:4), pp. 817-833.
[47]
Khatib, F., DiMaio, F., Cooper, S., Kazmierczyk, M., Gilski, M., Krzywda, S., Zabranska, H., Pichova, I., Thompson, J., and Popovi?, Z. 2011. "Crystal Structure of a Monomeric Retroviral Protease Solved by Protein Folding Game Players," Nature Structural & Molecular Biology (18:10), pp. 1175-1177.
[48]
Kilian, D. 2008. "When it Absolutely Has to Be Accurate, Don't Trust the Crowd," ECT News Network.
[49]
Kosmala, M., Wiggins, A., Swanson, A., and Simmons, B. 2016. "Assessing Data Quality in Citizen Science," Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment (14:10), pp. 551-560.
[50]
Krogh, B., Levy, S., Dutoit, A., and Subrahmanian, E. 1996. "Strictly Class-Based Modelling Considered Harmful," in Proceedings of the 29th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press, pp. 242-250.
[51]
Landis, J. R., and Koch, G. G. 1977. "The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data," Biometrics (33:1), pp. 159-174.
[52]
Larsen, K., and Bong, C. H. 2016. "A Tool for Addressing Construct Identity in Literature Reviews and Meta-Analyses," MIS Quarterly (40:3), pp. 529-552.
[53]
Lassaline, M. E., Wisniewski, E. J., and Medin, D. L. 1992. "Basic Levels in Artificial and Natural Categories: Are All Basic Levels Created Equal?," in Percepts, Concepts and Categories: The Representation and Processing of Information (Volume 93), Advances in Psychology, B. Barbara (ed.), Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 328-378.
[54]
Lee, Y. W. 2003. "Crafting Rules: Context-Reflective Data Quality Problem Solving," Journal of Management Information Systems (20:3), pp. 93-119.
[55]
Lee, Y. W., Pipino, L. L., Funk, J. D., and Wang, R. Y. 2006. Journey to Data Quality, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[56]
Leonardi, P. 2011. "When Flexible Routines Meet Flexible Technologies: Affordance, Constraint, and the Imbrication of Human and Material Agencies," MIS Quarterly (35:1), pp. 147-167.
[57]
Levy, M., and Germonprez, M. 2017. "The Potential for Citizen Science in Information Systems Research," Communications of the AIS (40), Article 2.
[58]
Lewandowski, E., and Specht, H. 2015. "Influence of Volunteer and Project Characteristics on Data Quality of Biological Surveys," Conservation Biology (29:3), pp. 713-723.
[59]
Li, G., Wang, J., Zheng, Y., and Franklin, M. 2016. "Crowd-sourced Data Management: A Survey," IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering (28:9), pp. 2296-2319.
[60]
Louv, R., Dickinson, J. L., and Bonney, R. 2012. Citizen Science: Public Participation in Environmental Research, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
[61]
Love, J., and Hirschheim, R. 2017. "Crowdsourcing of Information Systems Research," European Journal of Information Systems (26:4), pp. 315-332.
[62]
Lukyanenko, R., Parsons, J., and Samuel, B. M. 2019. "Representing Instances: The Case for Reengineering Conceptual Modeling Grammars," European Journal of Information Systems (28:1), pp. 68-90.
[63]
Lukyanenko, R., Parsons, J., and Wiersma, Y. 2014. "The IQ of the Crowd: Understanding and Improving Information Quality in Structured User-Generated Content," Information Systems Research (25:4), pp. 669-689.
[64]
Lukyanenko, R., Parsons, J., and Wiersma, Y. 2016. "Emerging Problems of Data Quality in Citizen Science," Conservation Biology (30:3), pp. 447-449.
[65]
Lukyanenko, R., Parsons, J., Wiersma, Y. F., Wachinger, G., Huber, B., and Meldt, R. 2017. "Representing Crowd Knowledge: Guidelines for Conceptual Modeling of User-Generated Content," Journal of the AIS (18:4), pp. 297-339.
[66]
Lukyanenko, R., Parsons, J., Wiersma, Y., Sieber, R., and Maddah, M. 2016. "Participatory Design for User-Generated Content: Understanding the Challenges and Moving Forward," Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems (28:1), pp. 37-70.
[67]
Madnick, S. E., Wang, R. Y., Lee, Y. W., and Zhu, H. 2009. "Overview and Framework for Data and Information Quality Research," Journal of Data and Information Quality (1:1), pp. 1-22.
[68]
Markus, M. L., and Silver, M. S. 2008. "A Foundation for the Study of IT Effects: A New Look at DeSanctis and Poole's Concepts of Structural Features and Spirit," Journal of the AIS (9:10/11), pp. 609-632.
[69]
Martinez, W. L., Martinez, A., and Solka, J. 2004. Exploratory Data Analysis with MATLAB, New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
[70]
Mayden, R. L. 2002. "On Biological Species, Species Concepts and Individuation in the Natural World," Fish and Fisheries (3:3), pp. 171-196.
[71]
McKinley, D. C., Miller-Rushing, A. J., Ballard, H. L., Bonney, R., Brown, H., Cook-Patton, S. C., Evans, D. M., French, R. A., Parrish, J. K., and Phillips, T. B. 2016. "Citizen Science Can Improve Conservation Science, Natural Resource Management, and Environmental Protection," Biological Conservation (208), pp. 15-28.
[72]
Meijer, A., Burger, N., and Ebbers, W. 2009. "Citizens4Citizens: Mapping Participatory Practices on the Internet," Electronic Journal of E-Government (7:1), pp. 99-112.
[73]
Mervis, C. B., and Rosch, E. 1981. "Categorization of Natural Objects," Annual Review of Psychology (32:1), pp. 89-115.
[74]
Newman, G., Wiggins, A., Crall, A., Graham, E., Newman, S., and Crowston, K. 2012. "The Future of Citizen Science: Emerging Technologies and Shifting Paradigms," Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment (10:6), pp. 298-304.
[75]
Norman, D. A. 1983. "Some Observations on Mental Models," Mental Models (7:112), pp. 7-14.
[76]
Nov, O., Arazy, O., and Anderson, D. 2014. "Scientists@ Home: What Drives the Quantity and Quality of Online Citizen Science Participation," PloS One (9:4), pp. 1-11.
[77]
Olivé, A. 2007. Conceptual Modeling of Information Systems, Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
[78]
Parreiras, F. S., and Staab, S. 2010. "Using Ontologies with UML Class-Based Modeling: The TwoUse Approach," Data & Knowledge Engineering (69:11), pp. 1194-1207.
[79]
Parsons, J., Lukyanenko, R., and Wiersma, Y. 2011. "Easier Citizen Science Is Better," Nature (471:7336), pp. 37-37.
[80]
Parsons, J., and Wand, Y. 2000. "Emancipating Instances from the Tyranny of Classes in Information Modeling," ACM Transactions on Database Systems (25:2), pp. 228-268.
[81]
Petter, S., DeLone, W., and McLean, E. R. 2013. "Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Independent Variables," Journal of Management Information Systems (29:4), pp. 7-62.
[82]
Pipino, L. L., Lee, Y. W., and Wang, R. Y. 2002. "Data Quality Assessment," Communications of the ACM (45:4), pp. 211-218.
[83]
Prestopnik, N. R., and Tang, J. 2015. "Points, Stories, Worlds, and Diegesis: Comparing Player Experiences in Two Citizen Science Games," Computers in Human Behavior (52), pp. 492-506.
[84]
Provost, F., and Fawcett, T. 2013. Data Science for Business: What You Need to Know about Data Mining and Data-Analytic Thinking, Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly Media, Inc.
[85]
Prpi?, J., Shukla, P. P., Kietzmann, J. H., and McCarthy, I. P. 2015. "How to Work a Crowd: Developing Crowd Capital through Crowdsourcing," Business Horizons (58:1), pp. 77-85.
[86]
Rai, A. 2016. "Editor's Comments: Synergies Between Big Data and Theory," MIS Quarterly (40:1), iii-ix.
[87]
Redman, T. C. 1996. Data Quality for the Information Age, Norwood, MA: Artech House.
[88]
Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., and Boyesbraem, P. 1976. "Basic Objects in Natural Categories," Cognitive Psychology (8:3), pp. 382-439.
[89]
Rosemann, M., and Vessey, I. 2008. "Toward Improving the Relevance of Information Systems Research to Practice: The Role of Applicability Checks," MIS Quarterly (32:1), pp. 1-22.
[90]
Saghafi, A. 2016. "Ontological and Cognitive Principles on Information Systems Modelling," Doctoral Dissertation, University of British Columbia.
[91]
Samuel, B. M., Khatri, V., and Ramesh, V. 2018. "Exploring the Effects of Extensional Versus Intentional Representations on Domain Understanding," MIS Quarterly (42:4), pp. 1186-1209.
[92]
Sawilowsky, S. S. 2009. "New Effect Size Rules of Thumb," Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods (8:2), pp. 467-474.
[93]
Sekhavat, Y., and Parsons, J. 2012. "Sliced Column-Store (SCS): Ontological Foundations and Practical Implications," in Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Conceptual Modeling, Florence, Italy, October 15-18, pp. 102-115.
[94]
Shankaranarayanan, G., and Blake, R. 2017. "From Content to Context: The Evolution and Growth of Data Quality Research," Journal of Data and Information Quality (8:2).
[95]
Shanks, G., Tansley, E., Nuredini, J., Tobin, D., and Weber, R. 2008. "Representing Part-Whole Relations in Conceptual Modeling: An Empirical Evaluation," MIS Quarterly (32:3), pp. 553-573.
[96]
Sheng, V. S., Provost, F., and Ipeirotis, P. G. 2008. "Get Another Label? Improving Data Quality and Data Mining Using Multiple, Noisy Labelers," in Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, New York: ACM Press, pp. 614-622.
[97]
Silvertown, J. 2009. "A New Dawn for Citizen Science," Trends in Ecology & Evolution (24:9), pp. 467-471.
[98]
Strong, D. M., Lee, Y. W., and Wang, R. Y. 1997. "Data Quality in Context," Communications of the ACM (40:5), pp. 103-110.
[99]
Sullivan, B. L., Wood, C. L., Iliff, M. J., Bonney, R. E., Fink, D., and Kelling, S. 2009. "EBird: A Citizen-Based Bird Observation Network in the Biological Sciences," Biological Conservation (142:10), pp. 2282-2292.
[100]
Surowiecki, J. 2005. The Wisdom of Crowds, New York: Anchor Books.
[101]
Swanson, A., Kosmala, M., Lintott, C., Simpson, R., Smith, A., and Packer, C. 2015. "Snapshot Serengeti, High-Frequency Annotated Camera Trap Images of 40 Mammalian Species in an African Savanna," Scientific Data (2), Article 150026.
[102]
Tax, S. S., and Brown, S. W. 1998. "Recovering and Learning from Service Failure," MIT Sloan Management Review (40:1), pp. 75-88.
[103]
Tilly, R., Posegga, O., Fischbach, K., and Schoder, D. 2016. "Towards a Conceptualization of Data and Information Quality in Social Information Systems," Business & Information Systems Engineering (59:1), pp. 3-21.
[104]
Trevino, L. K., and Victor, B. 1992. "Peer Reporting of Unethical Behavior: A Social Context Perspective," Academy of Management Journal (35:1), pp. 38-64.
[105]
Tucker, A. L., and Edmondson, A. C. 2003. "Why Hospitals Don't Learn from Failures: Organizational and Psychological Dynamics That Inhibit System Change," California Management Review (45:2), pp. 55-72.
[106]
Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D. 1974. "Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases," Science (185:4157), pp. 1124-1131.
[107]
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., and Davis, F. D. 2003. "User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View," MIS Quarterly (27:3), pp. 425-478.
[108]
Wallis, G., and Bülthoff, H. 1999. "Learning to Recognize Objects," Trends in Cognitive Sciences (3:1), pp. 22-31.
[109]
Wand, Y., and Wang, R. Y. 1996. "Anchoring Data Quality Dimensions in Ontological Foundations," Communications of the ACM (39:11), pp. 86-95.
[110]
Wang, R. Y., Reddy, M. P., and Kon, H. B. 1995. "Toward Quality Data: An Attribute-Based Approach," Decision Support Systems (13:3-4), pp. 349-372.
[111]
Wang, R. Y., and Strong, D. M. 1996. "Beyond Accuracy: What Data Quality Means to Data Consumers," Journal of Management Information Systems (12:4), pp. 5-33.
[112]
Wells, J. D., Valacich, J. S., and Hess, T. J. 2011. "What Signals Are You Sending? How Website Quality Influences Perceptions of Product Quality and Purchase Intentions," MIS Quarterly (35:2), pp. 373-396.
[113]
Wiggins, A., Bonney, R., Graham, E., Henderson, S., Kelling, S., LeBuhn, G., Litauer, R., Lots, K., Michener, W., and Newman, G. 2013. "Data Management Guide for Public Participation in Scientific Research," DataOne Working Group.
[114]
Wiggins, A., and Crowston, K. 2011. "From Conservation to Crowdsourcing: A Typology of Citizen Science," in Proceedings of the 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
[115]
Wiggins, A., Newman, G., Stevenson, R. D., and Crowston, K. 2011. "Mechanisms for Data Quality and Validation in Citizen Science," in Proceedings of the Computing for Citizen Science Workshop, IEEE eScience Conference, Stockholm, pp. 14-19.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image MIS Quarterly
MIS Quarterly  Volume 43, Issue 2
June 2019
544 pages
ISSN:0276-7783
  • Editor:
  • Arun Rai
Issue’s Table of Contents

Publisher

Society for Information Management and The Management Information Systems Research Center

United States

Publication History

Published: 01 June 2019

Author Tags

  1. citizen science
  2. crowdsourcing
  3. discovery
  4. information accuracy
  5. information completeness
  6. information precision
  7. information quality
  8. information systems design
  9. supervised machine learning
  10. user-generated content

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 26 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

View options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media