skip to main content
article

Visual Touch in Virtual Environments: An Exploratory Study of Presence, Multimodal Interfaces, and Cross-Modal Sensory Illusions

Published: 01 June 2001 Publication History

Abstract

How do users generate an illusion of presence in a rich and consistent virtual environment from an impoverished, incomplete, and often inconsistent set of sensory cues? We conducted an experiment to explore how multimodal perceptual cues are integrated into a coherent experience of virtual objects and spaces. Specifically, we explored whether inter-modal integration contributes to generating the illusion of presence in virtual environments.
To discover whether intermodal integration might play a role in presence, we looked for evidence of intermodal integration in the form of cross-modal interactions---perceptual illusions in which users use sensory cues in one modality to “fill in” the “missing” components of perceptual experience. One form of cross-modal interaction, a cross-modal transfer, is defined as a form of synesthesia, that is, a perceptual illusion in which stimulation to a sensory modality connected to the interface (such as the visual modality) is accompanied by perceived stimulation to an unconnected sensory modality that receives no apparent stimulation from the virtual environment (such as the haptic modality). Users of our experimental virtual environment who manipulated the visual analog of a physical force, a virtual spring, reported haptic sensations of “physical resistance”, even though the interface included no haptic displays. A path model of the data suggested that this cross-modal illusion was correlated with and dependent upon the sensation of spatial and sensory presence.
We conclude that this is evidence that presence may derive from the process of multi-modal integration and, therefore, may be associated with other illusions, such as cross-modal transfers, that result from the process of creating a coherent mental model of the space. Finally, we suggest that this perceptual phenomenon might be used to improve user experiences with multimodal interfaces, specifically by supporting limited sensory displays (such as haptic displays) with appropriate synesthetic stimulation to other sensory modalities (such as visual and auditory analogs of haptic forces).

References

[1]
Anderson, R. A., Snyder, L. H., Bradley, D. C., & Xing, J. (1997). Multimodal representation of space in the posterior parietal cortex and its use in planning movement. Annual Review in Neuroscience, 20, 303-330.
[2]
Barfield, W., Hendrix, C., Bjorneseth, O., Kaczmarek, K. A., & Lotens, W. (1995). Comparison of human sensory capabilities with technical specifications of virtual environment equipment. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 4(4), 329-357.
[3]
Barfield, W., Zeltzer, B., Sheridan, T., & Slater, M. (1995). Presence and performance within virtual environments. In W. Barfield & T. A. Furness (Eds.), Virtual environments and advanced interface design (pp. 473-513). New York: Oxford University Press.
[4]
Baron-Cohen, S., Wyke, M., & Binnie, C. (1996). Is there a normal phase of synaesthesia in development? Psyche, 2(27).
[5]
Begault, D. R. (1994). 3D sound for virtual reality and multi-media . New York: AP Professional.
[6]
Biocca, F. (1992). Will simulator sickness slow down the diffusion of virtual environment technology? Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 1(3), 258-264.
[7]
Biocca, F. (2000). Human-bandwidth and the design of Inter- net2 interfaces: Human factors and psychosocial challenges, In Internet2 Sociotechnical Summit (pp. 67-81). Ann Arbor, MI: University Corporation for Advanced Internet Development, Internet2.
[8]
Biocca, F., Kim, J., & Brady, R. (2000). The effect of aural narrative frames on feelings of presence in virtual environments . East Lansing, MI: Media Interface and Network Design Lab, Department of Telecommunication, Michigan State University.
[9]
Biocca, F., Polinsky, H., Inoue, H., & Lee, A. (2001). Intersensory integration and presence: Evidence from cross-modal interactions and perceptual illusions. East Lansing, MI: Media Interface and Network Design Lab, Department of Telecommunication, Michigan State University.
[10]
Biocca, F., & Rolland, J. (1998). Virtual eyes can rearrange your body: Adaptation to visual displacement in see-through, head-mounted displays. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 7(3), 262-277.
[11]
Bryant, D. J. (1992). A spatial representation system in humans. Psycholoquy, 3(16) {on-line serial}, (http:// psycholoquy.92.3.16.space.1.bryant).
[12]
Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1), 116-131.
[13]
Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Kao, C. F. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48(3), 306-307.
[14]
Cross, D. V., & Rotkin, L. (1975). The relation between size and apparent heaviness. Perception and psychophysics, 18, 79- 87.
[15]
Cytowic, R. E. (1989). Synesthesia: The union of the senses. Berlin: Springer Verlag.
[16]
Cytowic, R. E. (1995). Synesthesia: Phenomenology and neuropsychology, A review of current knowledge. Psyche, 2(10), 1-15.
[17]
Durlach, N., & Mavor, A. (1994). Virtual reality: Scientific and technological challenges. Washington: National Research Council.
[18]
Ellis, R. R., & Lederman, S. J. (1993). The role of haptic versus visual volume cues in the size-weight illusion. Perception and psychophysics, 55(3), 315-324.
[19]
Foreman, N., & Gillet, R. (Eds.). (1997). A handbook of spatial research paradigms and methodologies: Volume 1: Spatial Cognition in the Child and Adult. East Sussex: Psychology Press.
[20]
Foreman, N., & Gillet, R. (1998). A handbook of spatial research paradigms and methodologies: Volume 2: Clinical and Comparative Approaches . East Sussex: Psychology Press.
[21]
Fraisse, P. (1963). The psychology of time. New York: Harper & Row.
[22]
Fraisse, P. (1984). Perception and estimation of time. Annual review of psychology, 35, 1-36.
[23]
Graziano, M. S. A. (1999). Where is my arm? The relative role of vision and proprioception in the neuronal representation of limb position. Proceedings of the National Academic of Sciences, USA, 96, 411-418.
[24]
Held, R. M., & Durlach, N. I. (1992). Telepresence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 1(1), 109-112.
[25]
Hollier, M. P., Rimell, A. N., Hands, D. S., & Voelcker, R. M. (1999). Multi-modal perception. BT technological journal, 17(1), 35-46.
[26]
Howard, I. P., & Templeton, W. B. (1966). Human spatial orientation. London: Wiley.
[27]
Hunter, J. E., & Gerbing, D. W. (1982). Unidimensional measurement, second order factor analysis, and causal models. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, Vol. 4, pp. 267-320. Greenwich, CT.
[28]
Kennedy, R. S., Hettinger, L. J., & Lilienthal, M. G. (1987). Simulator sickness. In G. Crampton (Ed.), Motion and space sickness (pp. 317-341). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
[29]
Kim, J., & Mueller, C. W. (1978). Factor analysis: Statistical methods and practical issues. Beverly Hills: Sage.
[30]
Kolasinski, E. M. (May, 1995). Simulator sickness in virtual environments. Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Department of the Army.
[31]
Lang, P. J., Greenwald, M., Bradley, M. M., & Hamm, A. (1993). Looking at pictures: Evaluative, facial, visceral, and behavioral responses. Psychophysiology, 30, 261-273.
[32]
Lang, P. J., & Greenwald, M. K. (1985). The international affective picture system slides and technical report. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida Center for Research in Psychophysiology.
[33]
Lecuyer, A., Coquillart, S., & Kheddar, A. (2000). Pseudohaptic feedback: Can isometric input devices simulate force feedback? In S. K. Feiner & D. Thalmann (Eds.), Virtual reality 2000 conference (pp. 83-90). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.
[34]
Lombard, M., & Ditton, T. (1997). At the heart of it all: The concept of presence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(2) {on-line serial}. http://www.ascusc.org/ jcmc/
[35]
Lombard, M., & Ditton, T. (1999). Presence measures. Unpublished manuscript, Temple University. Available: http://nimbus.temple.edu/ ~mlombard/index.html.
[36]
Long, J. S. (1983). Confirmatory factor analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage.
[37]
Marks, L. E. (1978). The unity of the senses. New York: Academic Press.
[38]
Masin, C. M., & Crestoni, L. (1988). Experimental demonstration of the sensory basis of the size-weight illusion. Perception and psychophysics, 44, 309-371.
[39]
Neuman, W. R., Crigler, A. C., & Bove, V. M. (1991). Television sound and viewer perceptions. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Joint IEEE/Audio Engineering Society, Detroit, Michigan, February 1991, pp. 101-104.
[40]
Paillard, J. (Ed.). (1991). Brain and space. Cambridge, MA: Oxford Science Publications.
[41]
Pavani, F., Spence, C., & Driver, J. (2000). Visual capture of touch: Out-of-the-body experiences with rubber gloves. Psychological Science, 11(5), 353-359.
[42]
Ramachandran, V. S., & Rogers-Ramachandran, D. (1996). Synaesthesia in phantom limbs induced with mirrors. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 263, 377-386.
[43]
Ramachandran, V. S., Rogers-Ramachandran, D., & Cobb, S. (1995). Touching the phantom limb. Nature, 377, 489- 490.
[44]
Reeves, B., Detember, B., & Steuer, J. S. (1993). New television: The effects of big pictures and big sound on viewer responses to the screen. Paper presented at the International Communication Association, Chicago, IL.
[45]
Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[46]
Stanney, K. (1998). Aftereffects and sense of presence in virtual environments: Formulation of a research and development agenda. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 10(2), 135-187.
[47]
Stein, B., Wallace, M., & Meredith, A. (1995). Neural mechanisms mediating attention and orientation to multisensory cues. In M. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 683-702). Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.
[48]
Stein, B. E. (1984). Multimodal representation in the superior colliculus and optic tectum. Journal of Neurophysiology, 41, 55-64.
[49]
Stein, E., & Meredith, A. (1993). The merging of the senses. London: MIT Press.
[50]
Steuer, J. (1995). Defining virtual reality: Dimensions determining telepresence. In F. Biocca & M. Levy (Eds.), Communication in the age of virtual reality (pp. 33-56). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
[51]
Tang, A., Maslowski, E., & Biocca, F. (2000). Hands-on Virtual Cadaver Demonstration (ML-TR-2000-01). East Lansing, MI: Media Interface and Network Design Lab, Department of Telecommunication, Michigan State University.
[52]
Watkins, C. (1997). Synaesthesia: Is it the key to consciousness? Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Exeter.
[53]
Welch, R. (1978). Perceptual modification: Adapting to altered sensory environments. New York: Academic Press.
[54]
Welch, R. (1998). Adapting to telesystems. Unpublished manuscript, NASA-Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA.
[55]
Welch, R. (1999). Meaning, attention, and the unity assumption in the intersensory bias of spatial and temporal perceptions. In G. Aschersleben, T. Bachmann, & J. Müsseler (Eds.), Cognitive contributions to the perception of spatial and temporal events, (pp. 371-387). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
[56]
Welch, R. B., & Warren, D. H. (1980). Immediate perceptual response to intersensory discrepancy. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 638-667.
[57]
Welch, R. B., & Warren, D. H. (1986). Intersensory interactions. In Boff, K. K., Kaufman, L., & Thomas, J. P. (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance Vol. 1, pp. 25.1-25.36. New York: John Wiley.
[58]
Witmer, B. G., & Singer, M. J. (1994). Measuring immersion in virtual environments (Tech. Report 1014). Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.

Cited By

View all
  1. Visual Touch in Virtual Environments: An Exploratory Study of Presence, Multimodal Interfaces, and Cross-Modal Sensory Illusions

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments
      Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments  Volume 10, Issue 3
      June 2001
      100 pages

      Publisher

      MIT Press

      Cambridge, MA, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 01 June 2001

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
      Reflects downloads up to 07 Jan 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all

      View Options

      View options

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media