skip to main content
10.1145/3706890.3706973acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesisaimsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Classification of benign and malignant lung nodules based on feature fusion and improved random forest

Published: 13 January 2025 Publication History

Abstract

To improve the accuracy of benign and malignant classification of lung nodules in CT images, a method based on feature fusion and improved random forest is proposed to classify benign and malignant lung nodules. First, the high-order features of lung nodules extracted by convolutional noise reduction self-encoder and convolutional neural network are fused; second, the random forest model is optimized by two-step chi-square test. Experiments on benign and malignant classification were conducted using 2000 lung nodule samples in the LIDC-IDRI dataset. The experimental results show that the proposed method has high performance in classifying benign and malignant lung nodules, with accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.9566, 0.9524 and 0.9626, respectively. Compared with the original random forest, the number of decision trees was reduced by 80% and the accuracy was improved by 0.0144.

References

[1]
MCWILLIAMS A, TAMMEMAGI M C, Mayo J R, et al. Probability of Cancer in Pulmonary Nodules Detected on First Screening CT[J/OL]. New England Journal of Medicine, 2013, 369(10):910-919, [2020-03-20].
[2]
SMITH E, STEIN P, FURST J, et al. Weak Segmentations and Ensemble Learning to Predict Semantic Ratings of Lung Nodules[C/OL]//2013 12th International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications. Miami: IEEE, 2013, 519-524, [2020-03-20].
[3]
Gao Feng, Dai Meiling and Qi Jin. A classification method of pulmonary nodules based on Bootstrap- heterogeneous SVM ensemble learning [J/OL], Journal of Tianjin University, 2017, 050 (003): 321-327, [2020-03-20], http://www.cnki.com.cn/article/CJF DTOTAL-TJDX201703015, htm.
[4]
Reeves A P, Xie Y, Jirapatnakul A. Automated pulmonary nodule CT image characterization in lung cancer screening[J/OL]. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 2016, 11(1):73-88. [2020-03-20].
[5]
Dhara, A, Mukhopadhyay K, et al. Differential geometry-based techniques for characterization of boundary roughness of pulmonary nodules in CT images[J/OL]. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 2016, 11(3), 337–349, [2020-03-20]. https://sci-hub. Shop/10.1007/s11548-015-1284-0.
[6]
Vanbang L E, Zhu Yu, Zheng Bingbing, et al. Calculation model of image gray density distribution and classification of benign and malignant lung nodules [J/OL]. Computer Applications Research, 2020, 037 (001), 296-299, [2020-03-20]. http:// www.arocmag.com.
[7]
Zhang Mingming, Wang Qingfeng, Liu Zhiqin, et al. Lung nodule auxiliary diagnosis method based on deep migration learning [J/OL]. Computer Engineering, 2020, 46 (1): 271-278, [2020-03-20], 10.19678/j.issn.1000-3428.005340.
[8]
Li Li, Zhang haoyang, Qiao Lu. Classification of benign and malignant pulmonary nodules based on modified DCGAN network [J/OL]. Computer engineering. 2020, [2020-03-20].
[9]
Luo Jiaying, Zhao Juanjuan, Jiang Yan, et al. Diagnosis of pulmonary nodules based on multi-feature generalized depth self-coding [J/OL]. Computer Engineering and Design, 2019, 40 (1): 154-160, [2020-03-20]. http://www.cnki. com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-SJSJ201901025.htm. issn1000-7024.2019.01.026.
[10]
Zhao Xin, Qiang Yan, Ge Lei. Diagnosis of solitary pulmonary nodules based on bimodal depth self-coding [J]. Computer Science, 2017, (8): 318-323, [2020-03-20], 10.11896/j.issn.1002-137x.2017.08.054.
[11]
Kaur M, Gianey H K, Singh D, et al. multi-objective differential evolution based random forest for e-health applications[J/OL]. Modern Physics Letters B, 2019, 33(05):1950022.1-1950022.13. [2020-03-20].
[12]
Xia Jingming, Li Chong, Tan Ling, et al. Improved random forest classifier network intrusion detection method [J/OL]. Computer Engineering and Design, 2019, (8): 2146-2150, [2020-03-15], 10.16208/j. issn1000-7024.2019.08.009.
[13]
Paing M, Choomchuay S. Improved Random Forest (RF) Classifier for Imbalanced Classification of Lung Nodules[C/OL]// 2018 International Conference on Engineering, Applied Sciences, and Technology (ICEAST), Phuket, 2018, 1-4. [2020-03-20]. https:// sci-hub. Shop/10.1109/iceast.2018.8434402.
[14]
Liu Yu, Liu Lu, Gao yin, et al. Stochastic Forest algorithm based on attribute compatibility [J/OL]. Journal of Xi 'an University of Posts and Telecommunications, 2019, (3): 71-75, [2020-03-20], 10.13682/j.issn.2095-6533.2019.03.012.

Index Terms

  1. A Classification of benign and malignant lung nodules based on feature fusion and improved random forest

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ISAIMS '24: Proceedings of the 2024 5th International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence for Medicine Science
    August 2024
    967 pages
    ISBN:9798400717826
    DOI:10.1145/3706890
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 13 January 2025

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Classification of benign and malignant lung nodules
    2. chi-square test
    3. convolutional denoising auto-encoder
    4. convolutional neural network
    5. random forest

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    ISAIMS 2024

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 53 of 112 submissions, 47%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 1
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)1
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
    Reflects downloads up to 15 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Full Text

    View this article in Full Text.

    Full Text

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media