skip to main content
10.1145/3653666.3656086acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesrespectConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper
Open access

From State Legislation to Implementation: Moving Towards Justice-Centered Computing

Published: 16 May 2024 Publication History

Abstract

The demand to enact state-level computer science (CS) policies rapidly increased across the United States in response to advances in emerging technologies (e.g. Artificial Intelligence, cybersecurity, etc). The authors of this paper present the implications of K-12 CS education policies in the state of Tennessee, and recommendations to move towards justice-centered approaches after districts receivedStrategic CSforALL Resource & Implementation Planning Tool (SCRIPT) workshops to help set goals and prioritize CS implementation. Evidence connected to the CS education literature accompanied by the authors, who are partners supporting local education agencies (LEAs), and qualitative findings from workshops provided further reasoning for policy recommendations.

References

[1]
2022. https://www.tn.gov/content/dam/tn/education/2022-legislative-session/ Computer-Science-FAQs.pdf
[2]
W Richards Adrion, Sarah T Dunton, Barbara Ericson, Renee Fall, Carol Fletcher, and Mark Guzdial. 2020. US states must broaden participation while expanding access to computer science education. Commun. ACM 63, 12 (2020), 22--25.
[3]
Sanne F Akkerman and Arthur Bakker. 2011. Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of educational research 81, 2 (2011), 132--169.
[4]
Cassandra Broneak and Jennifer Rosato. 2021. Experiences of rural CS principles educators. In 2021 Conference on Research in Equitable and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT). IEEE, 1--2.
[5]
Alexis Cobo, Stephanie Wortel-London, Leigh Ann DeLyser, and Darius Ellis James. 2024. Small Steps, Big Process: Analyzing District Led Goals to Advance CS Education. In Proceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, V. 1 (, Portland, OR, USA,) (SIGCSE '24). Association for Computing Machinery, NewYork, NY, USA, 6 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3626252.3630924
[6]
Cynthia E. Coburn, Heather C. Hill, and James P. Spillane. 2016. Alignment and Accountability in Policy Design and Implementation: The Common Core State Standards and Implementation Research. Educational Researcher 45, 4 (2016), 243--251. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16651080 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16651080
[7]
Tennessee General Assembly Fiscal Review Committee. 2022. Fiscal Note HB 2153 - SB 2406. Tennessee General Assemble Fiscal Review Comm. https: //www.capitol.tn.gov//Bills/112/Fiscal/HB2153.pdf
[8]
Fiona Copland. 2018. Observation and fieldnotes. The Palgrave handbook of applied linguistics research methodology (2018), 249--268.
[9]
Angela Haydel Debarger, William R Penuel, Savitha Moorthy, Yves Beauvineau, Cathleen A Kennedy, and Christy Kim Boscardin. 2017. Investigating purposeful science curriculum adaptation as a strategy to improve teaching and learning. Science Education 101, 1 (2017), 66--98.
[10]
Leigh Ann DeLyser and Lauren Wright. 2019. A systems change approach to CS education: creating rubrics for school system implementation. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education. 492--498.
[11]
RobertMEmerson, Rachel I Fretz, and Linda L Shaw. 2001. Participant observation and fieldnotes. Handbook of ethnography (2001), 352--368.
[12]
Caitlin C Farrell, Christopher Harrison, and Cynthia E Coburn. 2019. "What the hell is this, and who the hell are you?" Role and identity negotiation in research-practice partnerships. AERA Open 5, 2 (2019), 2332858419849595.
[13]
Caitlin C Farrell, William R Penuel, Annie Allen, Eleanor R Anderson, Angel X Bohannon, Cynthia E Coburn, and Stephanie L Brown. 2022. Learning at the boundaries of research and practice: A framework for understanding research--practice partnerships. Educational Researcher 51, 3 (2022), 197--208.
[14]
White House. 2016. Fact sheet: President obama announces computer science for all initiative. Retrieved [4/20/17] from https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-pressoffice/2016/01/30/factsheet-president-obama-announces-computerscience-all-initiative (2016).
[15]
Véronique Irwin, Ke Wang, Tabitha Tezil, Jijun Zhang, Alison Filbey, Julie Jung, Farrah Bullock Mann, Rita Dilig, and Stephanie Parker. 2023. Report on the Condition of Education 2023. NCES 2023--144. National Center for Education Statistics (2023).
[16]
Amy J Ko, Anne Beitlers, Jayne Everson, BrettWortzman, and Dan Gallagher. 2023. Proposing, Planning, and Teaching an Equity-and Justice-Centered Secondary Pre-Service CS Teacher Education Program. In Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1. 583--589.
[17]
S Koshy, B Twarek, D Bashir, S Glass, R Goins, L Cruz Novohatski, and A Scott. 2022. Moving towards a vision of equitable computer science: Results of a landscape survey of PreK-12 CS teachers in the United States. Computer Science Teachers Association, Kapor Center. https://landscape. csteachers. org (2022).
[18]
Richard E Ladner and Maya Israel. 2016. For all" in" computer science for all. Commun. ACM 59, 9 (2016), 26--28.
[19]
Steven McGee, Randi McGee-Tekula, Jennifer Duck, Lucia Dettori, Ronald I Greenberg, Andrew M Rasmussen, Erica Wheeler, and Adam Shelton. 2020. Does a Computer Science Graduation Requirement Contribute to Increased Enrollment in Advanced Computer Science Coursework?. In 2020 Research on Equity and Sustained Participation in Engineering, Computing, and Technology (RESPECT), Vol. 1. IEEE, 1--2.
[20]
Monica McGill, Eric Snow, Luronne Vaval, Leigh Ann DeLyser, Stephanie Wortel-London, and Angelica Thompson. 2022. Practitioner perspectives on COVID-19's impact on computer science education among high schools serving students from lower and higher income families. ACM Transactions on Computing Education 23, 1 (2022), 1--31.
[21]
National Academies of Sciences Engineering, Medicine, et al. 2019. Monitoring educational equity. National Academies Press.
[22]
US Department of Education Office of Educational Technology. 2023. K -12 Digital Infrastructure Brief: Adequate and Future Proof., 20 pages. https://tech.ed.gov/files/2023/08/FINAL_Adequate_FutureProof.pdf
[23]
Mohammed A Qazi, Jeff Gray, Melody Russell, and David M Shannon. 2019. ECS4Alabama: A state-wide effort to provide access to authentic computer science education in predominantly rural and high minority schools. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 1279--1279.
[24]
Rafi Santo, Sara Vogel, and Dixie Ching. 2019. CS for what? Diverse visions of computer science education in practice. (2019).
[25]
A. Scott, S.V. White, D. Levitt, and K. Bobb. 2023. Justice-Centered Computing: A Framework for Action. https://www.kaporcenter.org/justicecs/ Accessed on January 31, 2024.
[26]
Kimberly A Scott, Kimberly M Sheridan, and Kevin Clark. 2015. Culturally responsive computing: A theory revisited. Learning, Media and Technology 40, 4 (2015), 412--436.
[27]
Ivory Toldson. 2023. Socially, Culturally, and Economically Diverse (SCED) -- Proposing a New Way to Describe the People, Communities, and Institutions that Deserve More. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/socially-culturallyeconomically-diverse-sced-new-way-ivory-toldson-w4w7e
[28]
Sepehr Vakil. 2018. Ethics, identity, and political vision: Toward a justice-centered approach to equity in computer science education. Harvard educational review 88, 1 (2018), 26--52.
[29]
Jayce R Warner, Carol L Fletcher, Ryan Torbey, and Lisa S Garbrecht. 2019. Increasing capacity for computer science education in rural areas through a large-scale collective impact model. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM technical symposium on computer science education. 1157--1163.
[30]
H. Weissman, B. Twarek, Dunton S., and J. Childs. 2023. 2023 State of Computer Science Education., 61 pages. https://advocacy.code.org/stateofcs
[31]
Stephanie B WORTEL-LONDON, Leigh Ann DELYSER, Lauren WRIGHT, and Júlia Helena AGUIAR. 2019. A Goal Analysis of Computer Science Education: Setting Institutional Goals for CS Ed. CoolThink@ JC (2019), 229.
[32]
Aman Yadav, Marie Heath, and Anne Drew Hu. 2022. Toward justice in computer science through community, criticality, and citizenship. Commun. ACM 65, 5 (2022), 42--44.

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
RESPECT 2024: Proceedings of the 2024 on RESPECT Annual Conference
May 2024
321 pages
ISBN:9798400706264
DOI:10.1145/3653666
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 16 May 2024

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. K-12 CS education
  2. computer science education
  3. justice-centered computing education
  4. policy implementation
  5. state policy
  6. teacher professional development

Qualifiers

  • Short-paper

Funding Sources

Conference

RESPECT 2024
Sponsor:

Upcoming Conference

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 115
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)115
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)22
Reflects downloads up to 27 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Login options

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media