Not Just Novelty: A Longitudinal Study on Utility and Customization of an AI Workflow
Pages 782 - 803
Abstract
Generative AI brings novel and impressive abilities to help people in everyday tasks. There are many AI workflows that solve real and complex problems by chaining AI outputs together with human interaction. Although there is an undeniable lure of AI, it is uncertain how useful generative AI workflows are after the novelty wears off. Additionally, workflows built with generative AI have the potential to be easily customized to fit users’ individual needs, but do users take advantage of this? We conducted a three-week longitudinal study with 12 users to understand the familiarization and customization of generative AI tools for science communication. Our study revealed that there exists a familiarization phase, during which users were exploring the novel capabilities of the workflow and discovering which aspects they found useful. After this phase, users understood the workflow and were able to anticipate the outputs. Surprisingly, after familiarization the perceived utility of the system was rated higher than before, indicating that the perceived utility of AI is not just a novelty effect. The increase in benefits mainly comes from end-users’ ability to customize prompts, and thus potentially appropriate the system to their own needs. This points to a future where generative AI systems can allow us to design for appropriation.
References
[1]
Ian Arawjo, Chelse Swoopes, Priyan Vaithilingam, Martin Wattenberg, and Elena Glassman. 2023. ChainForge: A Visual Toolkit for Prompt Engineering and LLM Hypothesis Testing. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2309.09128
[2]
Roy F Baumeister and Mark R Leary. 1995. The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation.Psychological bulletin 117, 3 (1995), 497.
[3]
Amaury Belin and Yannick Prié. 2012. DIAM: Towards a model for describing appropriation processes through the evolution of digital artifacts. In Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom) (DIS ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 645–654. https://doi.org/10.1145/2317956.2318053
[4]
Ivo Benke, Maren Schneider, Xuanhui Liu, and Alexander Maedche. 2022. TeamSpiritous - A Retrospective Emotional Competence Development System for Video-Meetings. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 6, CSCW2 (Nov 2022), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3555117
[5]
Thomas Berker, Maren Hartmann, and Yves Punie. 2005. Domestication of media and technology. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
[6]
Michael S. Bernstein, Greg Little, Robert C. Miller, Björn Hartmann, Mark S. Ackerman, David R. Karger, David Crowell, and Katrina Panovich. 2010. Soylent: a word processor with a crowd inside. In Proceedings of the 23nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (New York, New York, USA) (UIST ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 313–322. https://doi.org/10.1145/1866029.1866078
[7]
Ananya Bhattacharjee, Yuchen Zeng, Sarah Yi Xu, Dana Kulzhabayeva, Minyi Ma, Rachel Kornfield, Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed, Alex Mariakakis, Mary P Czerwinski, Anastasia Kuzminykh, 2023. Understanding the Role of Large Language Models in Personalizing and Scaffolding Strategies to Combat Academic Procrastination. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.13581 (2023).
[8]
Jessica Blaynee, Dr David Kreps, Dr Maria Kutar, and Dr Marie Griffiths. 2016. Collaborative HCI and UX: longitudinal diary studies as a means of uncovering barriers to digital adoption. In Proceedings of the 30th International BCS Human Computer Interaction Conference: Fusion! (Poole, United Kingdom) (HCI ’16). BCS Learning & Development Ltd., Swindon, GBR, Article 53, 6 pages. https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/HCI2016.72
[9]
Rishi Bommasani, Drew A. Hudson, Ehsan Adeli, Russ Altman, Simran Arora, Sydney von Arx, Michael S. Bernstein, Jeannette Bohg, Antoine Bosselut, Emma Brunskill, Erik Brynjolfsson, Shyamal Buch, Dallas Card, Rodrigo Castellon, Niladri Chatterji, Annie Chen, Kathleen Creel, Jared Quincy Davis, Dora Demszky, Chris Donahue, Moussa Doumbouya, Esin Durmus, Stefano Ermon, John Etchemendy, Kawin Ethayarajh, Li Fei-Fei, Chelsea Finn, Trevor Gale, Lauren Gillespie, Karan Goel, Noah Goodman, Shelby Grossman, Neel Guha, Tatsunori Hashimoto, Peter Henderson, John Hewitt, Daniel E. Ho, Jenny Hong, Kyle Hsu, Jing Huang, Thomas Icard, Saahil Jain, Dan Jurafsky, Pratyusha Kalluri, Siddharth Karamcheti, Geoff Keeling, Fereshte Khani, Omar Khattab, Pang Wei Koh, Mark Krass, Ranjay Krishna, Rohith Kuditipudi, Ananya Kumar, Faisal Ladhak, Mina Lee, Tony Lee, Jure Leskovec, Isabelle Levent, Xiang Lisa Li, Xuechen Li, Tengyu Ma, Ali Malik, Christopher D. Manning, Suvir Mirchandani, Eric Mitchell, Zanele Munyikwa, Suraj Nair, Avanika Narayan, Deepak Narayanan, Ben Newman, Allen Nie, Juan Carlos Niebles, Hamed Nilforoshan, Julian Nyarko, Giray Ogut, Laurel Orr, Isabel Papadimitriou, Joon Sung Park, Chris Piech, Eva Portelance, Christopher Potts, Aditi Raghunathan, Rob Reich, Hongyu Ren, Frieda Rong, Yusuf Roohani, Camilo Ruiz, Jack Ryan, Christopher Ré, Dorsa Sadigh, Shiori Sagawa, Keshav Santhanam, Andy Shih, Krishnan Srinivasan, Alex Tamkin, Rohan Taori, Armin W. Thomas, Florian Tramèr, Rose E. Wang, William Wang, Bohan Wu, Jiajun Wu, Yuhuai Wu, Sang Michael Xie, Michihiro Yasunaga, Jiaxuan You, Matei Zaharia, Michael Zhang, Tianyi Zhang, Xikun Zhang, Yuhui Zhang, Lucia Zheng, Kaitlyn Zhou, and Percy Liang. 2022. On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models. arxiv:2108.07258 [cs]http://arxiv.org/abs/2108.07258
[10]
Massimiano Bucchi and Brian Trench. 2021. Routledge Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology. Routledge. Google-Books-ID: Em4ZEAAAQBAJ.
[11]
Victor Bursztyn, David Demeter, Doug Downey, and Larry Birnbaum. 2022. Learning to Perform Complex Tasks through Compositional Fine-Tuning of Language Models. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2022 (Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 2022-12), Yoav Goldberg, Zornitsa Kozareva, and Yue Zhang (Eds.). Association for Computational Linguistics, 1676–1686. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.findings-emnlp.121
[12]
Jennie Carroll, Steve Howard, Frank Vetere, Jane Peck, and John Murphy. 2001. Identity, Power And Fragmentation in Cyberspace: Technology Appropriation by Young People. (01 2001).
[13]
DaEun Choi, Sumin Hong, Jeongeon Park, John Joon Young Chung, and Juho Kim. 2024. CreativeConnect: Supporting Reference Recombination for Graphic Design Ideation with Generative AI. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642794
[14]
Nicholas Davis, Holger Winnemöller, Mira Dontcheva, and Ellen Yi-Luen Do. 2013. Toward a cognitive theory of creativity support. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Creativity & Cognition (Sydney, Australia) (C&C ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1145/2466627.2466655
[15]
Edward L Deci and Richard M Ryan. 2000. The" what" and" why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological inquiry 11, 4 (2000), 227–268.
[16]
Paramveer S. Dhillon, Somayeh Molaei, Jiaqi Li, Maximilian Golub, Shaochun Zheng, and Lionel Peter Robert. 2024. Shaping Human-AI Collaboration: Varied Scaffolding Levels in Co-writing with Language Models. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (, Honolulu, HI, USA, ) (CHI ’24). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 1044, 18 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642134
[17]
Alan Dix. 2007. Designing for appropriation. In Proceedings of the 21st British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: HCI...but Not as We Know It - Volume 2 (University of Lancaster, United Kingdom) (BCS-HCI ’07). BCS Learning & Development Ltd., Swindon, GBR, 27–30.
[18]
Paul Dourish. 2003. The Appropriation of Interactive Technologies: Some Lessons from Placeless Documents. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) 12, 4 (2003), 465–490. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026149119426
[19]
Yilun Du, Shuang Li, Antonio Torralba, Joshua B. Tenenbaum, and Igor Mordatch. 2023. Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debate. arxiv:2305.14325 [cs]http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14325
[20]
Jacob Eisenstein, Daniel Andor, Bernd Bohnet, Michael Collins, and David Mimno. 2022. Honest Students from Untrusted Teachers: Learning an Interpretable Question-Answering Pipeline from a Pretrained Language Model. arxiv:2210.02498 [cs]http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.02498
[21]
Tyna Eloundou, Sam Manning, Pamela Mishkin, and Daniel Rock. 2023. GPTs are GPTs: An Early Look at the Labor Market Impact Potential of Large Language Models. arXiv:2303.10130 (Aug 2023). http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.10130 arXiv:2303.10130 [cs, econ, q-fin].
[22]
K. J. Kevin Feng, Q. Vera Liao, Ziang Xiao, Jennifer Wortman Vaughan, Amy X. Zhang, and David W. McDonald. 2024. Canvil: Designerly Adaptation for LLM-Powered User Experiences. http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.09051
[23]
Jennifer Fereday and Eimear Muir-Cochrane. 2006. Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International journal of qualitative methods (2006).
[24]
Linda Flower and John R. Hayes. 1981. A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing. College Composition and Communication 32, 4 (1981), 365–387. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ256235
[25]
Jie Gao, Yuchen Guo, Gionnieve Lim, Tianqin Zhang, Zheng Zhang, Toby Jia-Jun Li, and Simon Tangi Perrault. 2024. CollabCoder: A Lower-barrier, Rigorous Workflow for Inductive Collaborative Qualitative Analysis with Large Language Models. arxiv:2304.07366 [cs]http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.07366
[26]
Katy Ilonka Gero, Vivian Liu, and Lydia Chilton. 2022. Sparks: Inspiration for Science Writing Using Language Models. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Virtual Event, Australia) (DIS ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1002–1019. https://doi.org/10.1145/3532106.3533533
[27]
Katy Ilonka Gero, Vivian Liu, Sarah Huang, Jennifer Lee, and Lydia B. Chilton. 2021. What Makes Tweetorials Tick: How Experts Communicate Complex Topics on Twitter. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 5, CSCW2, Article 422 (oct 2021), 26 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3479566
[28]
Katy Ilonka Gero, Tao Long, and Lydia B Chilton. 2023. Social Dynamics of AI Support in Creative Writing. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Hamburg, Germany) (CHI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 245, 15 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580782
[29]
Saul Greenberg and Bill Buxton. 2008. Usability evaluation considered harmful (some of the time). In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Florence, Italy) (CHI ’08). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357074
[30]
Madeleine Grunde-McLaughlin, Michelle S. Lam, Ranjay Krishna, Daniel S. Weld, and Jeffrey Heer. 2023. Designing LLM Chains by Adapting Techniques from Crowdsourcing Workflows. arxiv:2312.11681 [cs]http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.11681
[31]
Guhyun Han, Jaehun Jung, Young-Ho Kim, and Jinwook Seo. 2023. DataHalo: A Customizable Notification Visualization System for Personalized and Longitudinal Interactions. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Hamburg Germany, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580828
[32]
Eszter Hargittai, Tobias Füchslin, and Mike S. Schäfer. 2018. How Do Young Adults Engage With Science and Research on Social Media? Some Preliminary Findings and an Agenda for Future Research. Social Media + Society 4, 3 (July 2018), 2056305118797720. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118797720 Publisher: SAGE Publications Ltd.
[33]
Sandra G Hart and Lowell E Staveland. 1988. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. Human mental workload 1, 3 (1988), 139–183.
[34]
Md Tanim Hasan, Shaila Zaman, Amanveer Wesley, Panagiotis Tsiamyrtzis, and Ioannis Pavlidis. 2023. Sympathetic Activation in Deadlines of Deskbound Research - A Study in the Wild. In Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Hamburg Germany, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544549.3585585
[35]
Paul Hekkert, Dirk Snelders, and Piet C. W. Van Wieringen. 2003. ‘Most advanced, yet acceptable’: Typicality and novelty as joint predictors of aesthetic preference in industrial design. British Journal of Psychology 94, 1 (2003), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712603762842147 _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1348/000712603762842147.
[36]
Ari Holtzman, Jan Buys, Li Du, Maxwell Forbes, and Yejin Choi. 2020. The Curious Case of Neural Text Degeneration. arXiv:1904.09751 [cs] (Feb. 2020). http://arxiv.org/abs/1904.09751
[37]
Qirui Huang, Min Lu, Joel Lanir, Dani Lischinski, Daniel Cohen-Or, and Hui Huang. 2024. GraphiMind: LLM-centric Interface for Information Graphics Design. arxiv:2401.13245 [cs]http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.13245
[38]
Hilary Hutchinson, Wendy Mackay, Bo Westerlund, Benjamin B. Bederson, Allison Druin, Catherine Plaisant, Michel Beaudouin-Lafon, Stéphane Conversy, Helen Evans, Heiko Hansen, Nicolas Roussel, and Björn Eiderbäck. 2003. Technology probes: inspiring design for and with families. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA) (CHI ’03). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1145/642611.642616
[39]
Daphne Ippolito, Reno Kriz, Maria Kustikova, João Sedoc, and Chris Callison-Burch. 2019. Comparison of Diverse Decoding Methods from Conditional Language Models. arXiv:1906.06362 [cs] (June 2019). http://arxiv.org/abs/1906.06362 arXiv:1906.06362.
[40]
Mohit Jain and Ravin Balakrishnan. 2012. User learning and performance with bezel menus. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2221–2230.
[41]
Lucas M. Jeno, Vigdis Vandvik, Sigrunn Eliassen, and John-Arvid Grytnes. 2019. Testing the novelty effect of an m-learning tool on internalization and achievement: A Self-Determination Theory approach. Computers & Education 128 (2019), 398–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.008
[42]
Peiling Jiang, Jude Rayan, Steven P. Dow, and Haijun Xia. 2023. Graphologue: Exploring Large Language Model Responses with Interactive Diagrams. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (San Francisco, CA, USA) (UIST ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 3, 20 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3586183.3606737
[43]
Majeed Kazemitabaar, Runlong Ye, Xiaoning Wang, Austin Z. Henley, Paul Denny, Michelle Craig, and Tovi Grossman. 2024. CodeAid: Evaluating a Classroom Deployment of an LLM-based Programming Assistant that Balances Student and Educator Needs. arxiv:2401.11314 [cs]http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.11314
[44]
Jeongyeon Kim, Sangho Suh, Lydia B Chilton, and Haijun Xia. 2023. Metaphorian: Leveraging Large Language Models to Support Extended Metaphor Creation for Science Writing. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Pittsburgh PA USA, 2023-07-10). ACM, 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1145/3563657.3595996
[45]
Tae Soo Kim, DaEun Choi, Yoonseo Choi, and Juho Kim. 2022. Stylette: Styling the Web with Natural Language. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 5, 17 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3501931
[46]
Tae Soo Kim, Yoonjoo Lee, Minsuk Chang, and Juho Kim. 2023. Cells, Generators, and Lenses: Design Framework for Object-Oriented Interaction with Large Language Models. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (San Francisco, CA, USA) (UIST ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 4, 18 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3586183.3606833
[47]
Maria Kjærup, Mikael B. Skov, Peter Axel Nielsen, Jesper Kjeldskov, Jens Gerken, and Harald Reiterer. 2021. Longitudinal Studies in HCI Research: A Review of CHI Publications From 1982–2019. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 11–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67322-2_2
[48]
Michael Koch, Kai von Luck, Jan Schwarzer, and Susanne Draheim. 2018. The novelty effect in large display deployments–Experiences and lessons-learned for evaluating prototypes. In Proceedings of 16th European conference on computer-supported cooperative work-exploratory papers. European Society for Socially Embedded Technologies (EUSSET).
[49]
Thomas Kosch, Robin Welsch, Lewis Chuang, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2023. The Placebo Effect of Artificial Intelligence in Human–Computer Interaction. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 29, 6, Article 56 (jan 2023), 32 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3529225
[50]
Alina Krischkowsky, Manfred Tscheligi, Katja Neureiter, Michael Muller, Anna Maria Polli, and Nervo Verdezoto. 2015. Experiences of Technology Appropriation: Unanticipated Users, Usage, Circumstances, and Design. (2015).
[51]
Poey Chin Lai. 2017. The literature review of technology adoption models and theories for the novelty technology. JISTEM-Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management 14 (2017), 21–38.
[52]
Ana Levordashka, Jamie Eastman, Eleni Anna Skoulikari, Anca Salagean, Darren Cosker, and Danaë Stanton Fraser. 2023. An Exploration of Theatre Rehearsals in Social Virtual Reality. In Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Hamburg Germany, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544549.3585685
[53]
Cheng Li, Mingyang Zhang, Qiaozhu Mei, Yaqing Wang, Spurthi Amba Hombaiah, Yi Liang, and Michael Bendersky. 2023. Teach LLMs to Personalize – An Approach inspired by Writing Education. arxiv:2308.07968 [cs]http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.07968
[54]
Grace Li, Tao Long, and Lydia B Chilton. 2023. Eliciting Topic Hierarchies from Large Language Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.19275arXiv:2310.19275 (2023). http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.19275
[55]
Maria R. Lima, Ting Su, Melanie Jouaiti, Maitreyee Wairagkar, Paresh Malhotra, Eyal Soreq, Payam Barnaghi, and Ravi Vaidyanathan. 2023. Discovering Behavioral Patterns Using Conversational Technology for In-Home Health and Well-Being Monitoring. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 10, 21 (2023), 18537–18552. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2023.3290833
[56]
Joseph Lindley, Paul Coulton, and Miriam Sturdee. 2017. Implications for Adoption. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 265–277. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025742
[57]
Greg Little, Lydia B. Chilton, Max Goldman, and Robert C. Miller. 2010. TurKit: human computation algorithms on mechanical turk. In Proceedings of the 23nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (New York, New York, USA) (UIST ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1145/1866029.1866040
[58]
Vivian Liu and Lydia B Chilton. 2022. Design Guidelines for Prompt Engineering Text-to-Image Generative Models. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 384, 23 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3501825
[59]
Vivian Liu, Tao Long, Nathan Raw, and Lydia Chilton. 2023. Generative Disco: Text-to-Video Generation for Music Visualization. arXiv:2304.08551 (Apr 2023). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2304.08551 arXiv:2304.08551 [cs].
[60]
Vivian Liu, Han Qiao, and Lydia Chilton. 2022. Opal: Multimodal Image Generation for News Illustration. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Bend, OR, USA) (UIST ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 73, 17 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3526113.3545621
[61]
Vivian Liu, Jo Vermeulen, George Fitzmaurice, and Justin Matejka. 2023. 3DALL-E: Integrating Text-to-Image AI in 3D Design Workflows. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, ) (DIS ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1955–1977. https://doi.org/10.1145/3563657.3596098
[62]
Tao Long and Lydia B. Chilton. 2023. Challenges and Opportunities for the Design of Smart Speakers. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2306.05741 arxiv:2306.05741 [cs]
[63]
Tao Long, Dorothy Zhang, Grace Li, Batool Taraif, Samia Menon, Kynnedy Simone Smith, Sitong Wang, Katy Ilonka Gero, and Lydia B. Chilton. 2023. Tweetorial Hooks: Generative AI Tools to Motivate Science on Social Media. In Proceedings of the 14th Conference on Computational Creativity(ICCC ’23). Association for Computational Creativity, Ontario, Canada, 44–53.
[64]
Wendy E. Mackay. 1991. Triggers and barriers to customizing software. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, Louisiana, USA) (CHI ’91). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1145/108844.108867
[65]
Allan MacLean, Kathleen Carter, Lennart Lövstrand, and Thomas Moran. 1990. User-tailorable systems: pressing the issues with buttons. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seattle, Washington, USA) (CHI ’90). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 175–182. https://doi.org/10.1145/97243.97271
[66]
Sampada Marathe and S. Shyam Sundar. 2011. What drives customization? control or identity?. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Vancouver, BC, Canada) (CHI ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 781–790. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979056
[67]
Ines Miguel-Alonso, David Checa, Henar Guillen-Sanz, and Andres Bustillo. 2024. Evaluation of the novelty effect in immersive Virtual Reality learning experiences. Virtual Reality 28, 1 (2024), 27.
[68]
Piotr Mirowski, Kory W. Mathewson, Jaylen Pittman, and Richard Evans. 2023. Co-Writing Screenplays and Theatre Scripts with Language Models: Evaluation by Industry Professionals. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Hamburg, Germany) (CHI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 355, 34 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581225
[69]
Thomas P Moran. 2002. Everyday adaptive design. In Proceedings of the 4th conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques (London England, 2002-06-25). ACM, 13–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/778712.778715
[70]
Anirban Mukherjee and Hannah Chang. 2023. The Creative Frontier of Generative AI: Managing the Novelty-Usefulness Tradeoff. arxiv:2306.03601 [cs]http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.03601
[71]
Michael Muller, Katja Neureiter, Nervo Verdezoto, Alina Krischkowsky, Anna Maria Al Zubaidi-Polli, and Manfred Tscheligi. 2016. Collaborative Appropriation: How Couples, Teams, Groups and Communities Adapt and Adopt Technologies. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing Companion (San Francisco, California, USA) (CSCW ’16 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 473–480. https://doi.org/10.1145/2818052.2855508
[72]
Peter Axel Nielsen. 2021. Longitudinal Studies in Information Systems. In Advances in Longitudinal HCI Research, Evangelos Karapanos, Jens Gerken, Jesper Kjeldskov, and Mikael B. Skov (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, 41–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67322-2_3
[73]
Shakked Noy and Whitney Zhang. 2023. Experimental evidence on the productivity effects of generative artificial intelligence. Science 381, 6654 (2023), 187–192. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adh2586 arXiv:https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.adh2586
[74]
OpenAI. 2024. GPT-4 Technical Report. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.08774 arxiv:2303.08774 [cs]
[75]
Joon Sung Park, Joseph O’Brien, Carrie Jun Cai, Meredith Ringel Morris, Percy Liang, and Michael S. Bernstein. 2023. Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behavior. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (San Francisco, CA, USA) (UIST ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 2, 22 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3586183.3606763
[76]
Savvas Petridis, Nicholas Diakopoulos, Kevin Crowston, Mark Hansen, Keren Henderson, Stan Jastrzebski, Jeffrey V Nickerson, and Lydia B Chilton. 2023. AngleKindling: Supporting Journalistic Angle Ideation with Large Language Models. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (, Hamburg, Germany, ) (CHI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 225, 16 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580907
[77]
Savvas Petridis, Michael Terry, and Carrie Jun Cai. 2023. PromptInfuser: Bringing User Interface Mock-Ups to Life with Large Language Models. In Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Hamburg, Germany) (CHI EA ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 237, 6 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544549.3585628
[78]
Savvas Petridis, Ben Wedin, James Wexler, Aaron Donsbach, Mahima Pushkarna, Nitesh Goyal, Carrie J. Cai, and Michael Terry. 2023. ConstitutionMaker: Interactively Critiquing Large Language Models by Converting Feedback into Principles. arxiv:2310.15428 [cs]http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.15428
[79]
Mailson de Queiroz Proença, Vivian Genaro Motti, Kamila Rios da Hora Rodrigues, and Vânia Paula de Almeida Neris. 2021. Coping with Diversity - A System for End-users to Customize Web User Interfaces. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 5, EICS, Article 201 (may 2021), 27 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3457151
[80]
Huilian Sophie Qiu, Anna Lieb, Jennifer Chou, Megan Carneal, Jasmine Mok, Emily Amspoker, Bogdan Vasilescu, and Laura Dabbish. 2023. Climate Coach: A Dashboard for Open-Source Maintainers to Overview Community Dynamics. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Hamburg Germany, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581317
[81]
Daniela Retelny, Michael S. Bernstein, and Melissa A. Valentine. 2017. No Workflow Can Ever Be Enough: How Crowdsourcing Workflows Constrain Complex Work. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 1, CSCW, Article 89 (dec 2017), 23 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3134724
[82]
Daniela Retelny, Sebastien Robaszkiewicz, Alexandra To, Walter S. Lasecki, Jay Patel, Negar Rahmati, Tulsee Doshi, Melissa Valentine, and Michael S. Bernstein. 2014. Expert crowdsourcing with flash teams. In Proceedings of the 27th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology - UIST ’14. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 75–85. https://doi.org/10.1145/2642918.2647409
[83]
Luiz Rodrigues, Filipe D. Pereira, Armando M. Toda, Paula T. Palomino, Marcela Pessoa, Leandro Silva Galvão Carvalho, David Fernandes, Elaine H. T. Oliveira, Alexandra I. Cristea, and Seiji Isotani. 2022. Gamification suffers from the novelty effect but benefits from the familiarization effect: Findings from a longitudinal study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 19, 1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00314-6 Publisher: SpringerOpen.
[84]
Steven I. Ross, Fernando Martinez, Stephanie Houde, Michael Muller, and Justin D. Weisz. 2023. The Programmer’s Assistant: Conversational Interaction with a Large Language Model for Software Development. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (Sydney, NSW, Australia) (IUI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 491–514. https://doi.org/10.1145/3581641.3584037
[85]
Isa Rutten, Lawrence Van den Bogaert, and David Geerts. 2021. From Initial Encounter With Mid-Air Haptic Feedback to Repeated Use: The Role of the Novelty Effect in User Experience. IEEE Transactions on Haptics 14, 3 (2021), 591–602. https://doi.org/10.1109/TOH.2020.3043658
[86]
Isa Rutten and David Geerts. 2020. Better Because It’s New: The Impact of Perceived Novelty on the Added Value of Mid-Air Haptic Feedback. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376668
[87]
Richard M Ryan and Edward L Deci. 2017. Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford publications.
[88]
Soheil Sadeghi, Somit Gupta, Stefan Gramatovici, Jiannan Lu, Hao Ai, and Ruhan Zhang. 2022. Novelty and Primacy: A Long-Term Estimator for Online Experiments. Technometrics 64, 4 (2022), 524–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.2022.2124309 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.2022.2124309
[89]
Timo Schick, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Zhengbao Jiang, Fabio Petroni, Patrick Lewis, Gautier Izacard, Qingfei You, Christoforos Nalmpantis, Edouard Grave, and Sebastian Riedel. 2022. PEER: A Collaborative Language Model. arxiv:2208.11663 [cs]http://arxiv.org/abs/2208.11663
[90]
Woosuk Seo, Chanmo Yang, and Young-Ho Kim. 2024. ChaCha: Leveraging Large Language Models to Prompt Children to Share Their Emotions about Personal Events. arxiv:2309.12244 [cs]http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.12244
[91]
Hua Shen, Chieh-Yang Huang, Tongshuang Wu, and Ting-Hao Kenneth Huang. 2023. ConvXAI: Delivering Heterogeneous AI Explanations via Conversations to Support Human-AI Scientific Writing. In Companion Publication of the 2023 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (Minneapolis, MN, USA) (CSCW ’23 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 384–387. https://doi.org/10.1145/3584931.3607492
[92]
Yongliang Shen, Kaitao Song, Xu Tan, Dongsheng Li, Weiming Lu, and Yueting Zhuang. 2023. HuggingGPT: Solving AI Tasks with ChatGPT and its Friends in Hugging Face. arxiv:2303.17580 [cs.CL]
[93]
Grace Shin, Yuanyuan Feng, Mohammad Hossein Jarrahi, and Nicci Gafinowitz. 2018. Beyond novelty effect: a mixed-methods exploration into the motivation for long-term activity tracker use. JAMIA Open 2, 1 (2018), 62–72. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooy048 _eprint: https://academic.oup.com/jamiaopen/article-pdf/2/1/62/32298485/ooy048.pdf.
[94]
Sungbok Shin, Sanghyun Hong, and Niklas Elmqvist. 2023. Perceptual Pat: A Virtual Human Visual System for Iterative Visualization Design. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Hamburg Germany, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580974
[95]
Nikhil Singh, Guillermo Bernal, Daria Savchenko, and Elena L. Glassman. 2022. Where to Hide a Stolen Elephant: Leaps in Creative Writing with Multimodal Machine Intelligence. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. (feb 2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3511599 Just Accepted.
[96]
Kihoon Son, DaEun Choi, Tae Soo Kim, Young-Ho Kim, and Juho Kim. 2023. GenQuery: Supporting Expressive Visual Search with Generative Models. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.01287 arxiv:2310.01287 [cs]
[97]
Adam J Sporka, Torsten Felzer, Sri H Kurniawan, Ondřej Poláček, Paul Haiduk, and I Scott MacKenzie. 2011. Chanti: Predictive text entry using non-verbal vocal input. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2463–2472.
[98]
Sangho Suh, Meng Chen, Bryan Min, Toby Jia-Jun Li, and Haijun Xia. 2024. Luminate: Structured Generation and Exploration of Design Space with Large Language Models for Human-AI Co-Creation., Article 644 (2024), 26 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642400
[99]
Sangho Suh, Bryan Min, Srishti Palani, and Haijun Xia. 2023. Sensecape: Enabling Multilevel Exploration and Sensemaking with Large Language Models. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST). https://doi.org/doi/10.1145/3586183.3606756
[100]
Symplur. 2019. Tweetorials — From Early Beginnings to Huge Growth and Beyond. https://www.symplur.com/blog/tweetorials-from-early-beginnings-to-huge-growth-and-beyond/
[101]
Crystal Han-Huei Tsay, Alexander K. Kofinas, Smita K. Trivedi, and Yang Yang. 2020. Overcoming the novelty effect in online gamified learning systems: An empirical evaluation of student engagement and performance. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 36, 2 (2020), 128–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12385 arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/jcal.12385
[102]
Tiffany Tseng, Ruijia Cheng, and Jeffrey Nichols. 2024. Keyframer: Empowering Animation Design using Large Language Models. arxiv:2402.06071 [cs]http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.06071
[103]
Alexandra Voit, Jasmin Niess, Caroline Eckerth, Maike Ernst, Henrike Weingärtner, and Paweł W. Woźniak. 2020. ‘It’s not a romantic relationship’: Stories of Adoption and Abandonment of Smart Speakers at Home. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (Essen, Germany) (MUM ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1145/3428361.3428469
[104]
Sitong Wang, Samia Menon, Tao Long, Keren Henderson, Dingzeyu Li, Kevin Crowston, Mark Hansen, Jeffrey V. Nickerson, and Lydia B. Chilton. 2024. ReelFramer: Human-AI Co-Creation for News-to-Video Translation. In Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–20.
[105]
Sitong Wang, Savvas Petridis, Taeahn Kwon, Xiaojuan Ma, and Lydia B Chilton. 2023. PopBlends: Strategies for conceptual blending with large language models. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–19.
[106]
Jason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma, Brian Ichter, Fei Xia, Ed Chi, Quoc Le, and Denny Zhou. 2023. Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models. arXiv:2201.11903 (2023). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2201.11903 arxiv:2201.11903 [cs]
[107]
Spencer Williams, Ridley Jones, Katharina Reinecke, and Gary Hsieh. 2022. An HCI Research Agenda for Online Science Communication. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 6, CSCW2 (Nov 2022), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3555591
[108]
Qingyun Wu, Gagan Bansal, Jieyu Zhang, Yiran Wu, Beibin Li, Erkang Zhu, Li Jiang, Xiaoyun Zhang, Shaokun Zhang, Jiale Liu, Ahmed Hassan Awadallah, Ryen W White, Doug Burger, and Chi Wang. 2023. AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversation. arxiv:2308.08155 [cs.AI]
[109]
Tongshuang Wu, Ellen Jiang, Aaron Donsbach, Jeff Gray, Alejandra Molina, Michael Terry, and Carrie J Cai. 2022. PromptChainer: Chaining Large Language Model Prompts through Visual Programming. In Extended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI EA ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 359, 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491101.3519729
[110]
Tongshuang Wu, Michael Terry, and Carrie Jun Cai. 2022. AI Chains: Transparent and Controllable Human-AI Interaction by Chaining Large Language Model Prompts. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 385, 22 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517582
[111]
Tongshuang Wu, Haiyi Zhu, Maya Albayrak, Alexis Axon, Amanda Bertsch, Wenxing Deng, Ziqi Ding, Bill Guo, Sireesh Gururaja, Tzu-Sheng Kuo, Jenny T. Liang, Ryan Liu, Ihita Mandal, Jeremiah Milbauer, Xiaolin Ni, Namrata Padmanabhan, Subhashini Ramkumar, Alexis Sudjianto, Jordan Taylor, Ying-Jui Tseng, Patricia Vaidos, Zhijin Wu, Wei Wu, and Chenyang Yang. 2023. LLMs as Workers in Human-Computational Algorithms? Replicating Crowdsourcing Pipelines with LLMs. arxiv:2307.10168 [cs]http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.10168
[112]
Shishi Xiao, Liangwei Wang, Xiaojuan Ma, and Wei Zeng. 2024. TypeDance: Creating Semantic Typographic Logos from Image through Personalized Generation. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642185 arxiv:2401.11094 [cs]
[113]
Yuxi Xie, Kenji Kawaguchi, Yiran Zhao, Xu Zhao, MingSung Kan, Junxian He, and Qizhe Xie. 2023. Self-Evaluation Guided Beam Search for Reasoning. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:258426922
[114]
Kevin Yang, Yuandong Tian, Nanyun Peng, and Dan Klein. 2022. Re3: Generating Longer Stories With Recursive Reprompting and Revision. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 2022-12), Yoav Goldberg, Zornitsa Kozareva, and Yue Zhang (Eds.). Association for Computational Linguistics, 4393–4479. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.296
[115]
J.D. Zamfirescu-Pereira, Richmond Y. Wong, Bjoern Hartmann, and Qian Yang. 2023. Why Johnny Can’t Prompt: How Non-AI Experts Try (and Fail) to Design LLM Prompts. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Hamburg, Germany) (CHI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 437, 21 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581388
[116]
Qianqia (Queenie) Zhang, Soya Park, Michael Muller, and David R. Karger. 2024. "How fancy you are to make us use your fancy tool": Coordinating Individuals’ Tool Preference over Group Boundaries. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 8, GROUP, Article 4 (feb 2024), 31 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3633069
[117]
Zheng Zhang, Jie Gao, Ranjodh Singh Dhaliwal, and Toby Jia-Jun Li. 2023. VISAR: A Human-AI Argumentative Writing Assistant with Visual Programming and Rapid Draft Prototyping. In Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (San Francisco, CA, USA) (UIST ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 5, 30 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3586183.3606800
[118]
Ran Zhou, Zachary Schwemler, Akshay Baweja, Harpreet Sareen, Casey Lee Hunt, and Daniel Leithinger. 2023. TactorBots: A Haptic Design Toolkit for Out-of-lab Exploration of Emotional Robotic Touch. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Hamburg Germany, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580799
[119]
Zhongyi Zhou, Jing Jin, Vrushank Phadnis, Xiuxiu Yuan, Jun Jiang, Xun Qian, Jingtao Zhou, Yiyi Huang, Zheng Xu, Yinda Zhang, Kristen Wright, Jason Mayes, Mark Sherwood, Johnny Lee, Alex Olwal, David Kim, Ram Iyengar, Na Li, and Ruofei Du. 2023. InstructPipe: Building Visual Programming Pipelines with Human Instructions. arxiv:2312.09672 [cs]http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.09672
Index Terms
- Not Just Novelty: A Longitudinal Study on Utility and Customization of an AI Workflow
Recommendations
A Demonstration of End-User Code Customization Using Generative AI
VaMoS '24: Proceedings of the 18th International Working Conference on Variability Modelling of Software-Intensive SystemsProducing a variant of code is highly challenging, particularly for individuals unfamiliar with programming. This demonstration introduces a novel use of generative AI to aid end-users in customizing code. We first describe how generative AI can be used ...
Exploring Human-Centered Approaches in Generative AI and Introductory Programming Research: A Scoping Review
UKICER '24: Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on United Kingdom & Ireland Computing Education ResearchRecent advancements in generative artificial intelligence are poised to reshape introductory programming education, challenging conventional teaching methodologies. This paper presents a scoping review that explores the current understanding of ...
Older Adults and the Appropriation and Disappropriation of Smartphones
Proceedings, Part I, of the First International Conference on Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Design for Aging - Volume 9193Research in recent years has focused on examining the acceptance as well as the appropriation of technologies amongst older adults, especially in how technologies alleviate issues of functional declines, loneliness, and financial difficulties brought ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
July 2024
3616 pages
ISBN:9798400705830
DOI:10.1145/3643834
Copyright © 2024 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 01 July 2024
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Funding Sources
Conference
DIS '24
Sponsor:
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 1,158 of 4,684 submissions, 25%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 399Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)399
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)65
Reflects downloads up to 22 Dec 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format