Analogies in Upper Division Computer Science Courses
Pages 1632 - 1633
Abstract
Analogies have long been proposed as a valuable teaching mechanism, but the question of whether student-generated analogies are more effective for learning compared to those generated by the instructor has not been answered. We compare three different treatments: no analogy, an analogy provided by the instructor, and analogies generated by students. We apply these treatments to two upper-division computer science courses--Operating Systems (OS) and Programming Languages (PL)--and evaluate student learning. Our findings show that any effect of these treatments on student learning is minimal. We found no practical or statistically significant differences between them. Anecdotally, the student-generated analogies provided an active learning activity, and the instructor-provided analogies were the only ones mentioned in written responses to graded events. Given the small differences in learning, instructors can select the treatment based on their needs; for example, selecting the student-generated option for active learning or the instructor-provided option when time is short.
References
[1]
B. Bettin, L. Ott, and J. Hiebel. 2022. Semaphore or Metaphor? Exploring Concurrent Students' Conceptions of and with Analogy. In Proc. of 27th ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in CS Education Vol. 1. ACM, NY, NY, USA, 200--6.
[2]
E.W. Dijkstra. 1988. On the cruelty of really teaching computing science. (Dec 1988). http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/EWD/ewd10xx/EWD1036.PDF
[3]
S. Duvall. 2008. Computer Science Fairy Tales. J. Comput. Sci. Coll., Vol. 24, 2 (Dec 2008), 98--104.
[4]
D. Gentner. 1980. The Structure of Analogical Models in Science. Technical Report 4451. BBN, Inc. https://archive.org/details/DTIC_ADA087625/page/n1/mode/2up.
[5]
M. Guzdial. 2020. Dijkstra Was Wrong About 'Radical Novelty': Metaphors in CS Education. https://cacm.acm.org/blogs/blog-cacm/248985-dijkstra-was-wrong-about-radical-novelty-metaphors-in-cs-education/fulltext
[6]
F. Hermans, A. Swidan, E. Aivaloglou, and M. Smit. 2018. Thinking out of the Box: Comparing Metaphors for Variables in Programming Education. In Proc. of the 13th Wksp in Primary and Secondary Computing Education. ACM, NY, NY, USA, bibinfonumpages8 pages.
[7]
K.N. Macfarlane and B.T. Mynatt. 1988. A Study of an Advance Organizer as a Technique for Teaching Computer Programming Concepts. In Proc. of the 19th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on CS Education. ACM, NY, NY, USA, 240--243.
[8]
J.P. Sanford, A. Tietz, S. Farooq, S. Guyer, and S.R. Benjamin. 2014. Metaphors We Teach By. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. ACM, NY, NY, USA, 585--590.
[9]
S. Schez-Sobrino et al. 2019. ANGELA: A Novel Approach of Graphic Notation Based on the Metaphor of Road Signs to Facilitate the Learning of Programming. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality. ACM, NY, NY, USA, 822--829.
[10]
A. Tartaro, B.C. Goess, J. Miller, and J.A. Bui. 2016. Learning Outcomes From a Student-Generated 'Flipped' Wiki Textbook. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Supporting Group Work. ACM, NY, NY, USA, 449--452. io
Index Terms
- Analogies in Upper Division Computer Science Courses
Recommendations
Enhancing Learning in Introductory Computer Science Courses Through SCALE: An Empirical Study
The work presented in this paper aims to support and promote the learning process in introductory computer science courses through the Web-based, adaptive, activity-oriented learning environment known as Supporting Collaboration and Adaptation in a ...
Can peer instruction be effective in upper-division computer science courses?
Special Issue on Alternatives to Lecture in the Computer Science ClassroomPeer Instruction (PI) is an active learning pedagogical technique. PI lectures present students with a series of multiple-choice questions, which they respond to both individually and in groups. PI has been widely successful in the physical sciences and,...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
March 2024
2007 pages
ISBN:9798400704246
DOI:10.1145/3626253
- General Chairs:
- Ben Stephenson,
- Jeffrey A. Stone,
- Program Chairs:
- Lina Battestilli,
- Samuel A. Rebelsky,
- Libby Shoop
Copyright © 2024 Owner/Author.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 15 March 2024
Check for updates
Qualifiers
- Poster
Conference
SIGCSE 2024
Sponsor:
SIGCSE 2024: The 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education
March 20 - 23, 2024
OR, Portland, USA
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 1,595 of 4,542 submissions, 35%
Upcoming Conference
SIGCSE TS 2025
- Sponsor:
- sigcse
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 49Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)49
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 23 Jan 2025
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign in