skip to main content
research-article

Identity in Higher Computer Education Research: A Systematic Literature Review

Published: 12 September 2023 Publication History

Abstract

The disciplinary identity as a computer science student has recently received increasing attention as a well-developed subject identity can help with increasing retention, interest, and motivation. Besides, identity theory can serve as an analytical lens for issues around diversity. However, identity is also often perceived as a vague, overused concept with a variety of theories to build upon. In addition, connections to other topics, such as computer science conceptions, remain unclear and there seems to be little intra-disciplinary exchange about the concept. This article, therefore, attempts to provide a starting point by presenting a so far missing systematic literature review of identity in Computing Education Research (CER). We analyzed a corpus of 41 articles published since 2005 with a focus on the variety of identity theories that are used, the reasons for using them, and the overall theoretical framing of the concept in the CER literature up to this point. We use content analysis with both inductive and deductive coding to derive categories from the corpus to answer our research questions. The results show that there is less variety in the theories than originally expected, most publications refer to the theory of “Communities of Practice”. The reasons for employing identity theory are also rather canonical, in particular, there is only little theoretical development of the theories within CER and also only little empirical work. Finally, we also present an extended version of a computing identity that can be theoretically derived from the work in our corpus.

Appendix

Below we present short summaries of all the articles contained in our corpus. All summaries follow the same structure. Method, Participants, Identity Development or Usage as well as the Framework are derived from the coding process described in Section 3. The Adjacent concepts include the coding for the motivation (s. Research Question 2) as well as other concepts that were mentioned in the articles in relation to identity.
Boyer et al. [9]: Increasing Technical Excellence, Leadership and Commitment of Computing Students through Identity-Based Mentoring (2010)
Intention: Evaluation of an intervention on Computing Identity Mentoring, that is, the impact of mentoring on performance and retention.
Method/Participants: Surveys/Beginners, Advanced
Identity Development or Usage: As Explanation for Other Concepts
Framework and Adjacent Concepts: No Framework/Retention, Performance, Self-efficacy, Leadership, Career planing
Results: As a result of their empirical study, the authors report that Computing Identity Mentoring has a positive impact on students’ development as computer scientists.
Choe and Borrego [18]: Prediction of engineering identity in engineering graduate students (2019)
Intention: The authors observed that identity research exists for undergraduates (e.g., instruments) but not for master’s and PhD students. Their study investigates whether the results for undergraduates are applicable to their target group and where the differences lie.
Method/Participants: Surveys, Interviews/Professionals
Identity Development or Usage: Transfer to other Target Group
Framework and Adjacent Concepts: Carlone & Johnson, Gee/Recruitment, Retention, Interpersonal skills, Curriculum Design
Results: The article reports on the development of a new instrument for an engineering identity scale consisting of four factors: Interest, Recognition, Competence, and Interpersonal Skills Competence. While the first three factors are already present in Carlone & Johnson, the Interpersonal Skill Competence factor is an extension to the more professional target group, reflecting the broader responsibilities of master’s and PhD students.
Cohoon et al. [22]: Conflicted Identities and Sexism in Computing graduate programs (2010)
Intention: The article discusses women’s experiences with sexism and related coping strategies, such as minimizing their feminine identity.
Method/Participants: Focus groups/Advanced
Identity Development or Usage: As Theoretical Lens
Framework and Adjacent Concepts: Collective Identity/Diversity
Results: The study further examines the coping strategies of either denying sexism or one’s own female identity as responses to dealing with sexism in CS.
Cummings et al. [25]: Computing Resilient Identity Development and Maintenance of Black Americans Who Earned a PhD in Computing (2019)
Intention: The authors examine factors that contribute to the success and identity development of African American PhDs.
Method/Participants: Interviews/Professionals
Identity Development or Usage: As Theoretical Lens
Framework and Adjacent Concepts: PVEST (Spencer et al.)/Diversity, Sense of Belonging, Resilience
Results: The study reports exploratory results that show how to develop and maintain a resilient computing identity.
Davis et al. [28]: Multiple Case Study of Nerd Identity in a CS1 Class (2014)
Intention: The article discusses observations on student identities in a CS 1 course, specifically on the “nerd identity” and the consequences for multiple/diverse identities.
Method/Participants: Observation, Interviews/Beginners
Identity Development or Usage: As Theoretical Lens
Framework and Adjacent Concepts: Carlone & Johnson/Recruitment, Diversity
Results: The analysis shows how nerd identities enhance participation and engagement in CS, which is in contrast to much other research that portrays nerd identity as stereotypical or problematic.
Garcia et al. [41]: Examining the Computing Identity of High-Achieving Underserved Computing Students on the Basis of Gender, Field, and Year in School (2018)
Intention: The authors examine the success factors and computing identity of high-achieving underserved computing students.
Method/Participants: Surveys/Beginners, Advanced
Identity Development or Usage: As Theoretical Lens
Framework and Adjacent Concepts: Computing Identity Framework (Mahadeo et al.)/Diversity, Gender, Underserved Students
Results: The study identifies differences in computing identity between genders, first and post-second year students, and various study programs, as well as differences between sub-constructs.
Harrington et al. [52]: A Qualitative Analysis of Computing Students’ Professional Identity and its Relationship to Strategies for Coping with Stressors in the Computing Disciplines (2007)
Intention: The article examines students’ professional identity development and related stressors, as well as coping strategies students describe to promote overall identity development.
Method/Participants: Focus groups/Beginners, Advanced
Identity Development or Usage: Concept Refinement
Framework and Adjacent Concepts: Professional identity/Retention
Results: As a result of this study, the overall Professional Development framework will be revised to include, for example, “nerd-being” as part of Professional Identity development. Furthermore, stressors of Professional Development are being discussed.
Hughes et al. [57]: Development of Leadership Self-Efficacy: Comparing Engineers, Other STEM, and Non-STEM Majors (2018)
Intention: The article uses Lave and Wenger’s community of practice theory to shed light on the co-development of engineering identity and leadership through an empirical study.
Method/Participants: Surveys/Advanced
Identity Development or Usage: Concept Refinement
Framework and Adjacent Concepts: Lave & Wenger/Technical mastery, Professionalism
Results: The preliminary results reported by the authors suggest a positive relationship between engineering identity and leadership. However, this link is very tenuous: both leadership and identity are fostered by internships, group projects, and so on, so a dependence on a third factor seems likely.
Kapoor and Gardner-McCune [61]: Understanding CS Undergraduate Students’ Professional Identity through the lens of their Professional Development (2019)
Intention: In this interview study, intrinsic and discipline-specific factors are listed and students’ extracurricular community engagement is recorded to examine how students develop their professional identity.
Method/Participants: Interviews/Beginners, Advanced
Identity Development or Usage: As Basis for Interventions
Framework and Adjacent Concepts: Marcia (Identity Status Theory)/Professional identity, Curriculum design
Results: It was found that computer science students develop their professional identity between the second and third year of study. The authors also emphasize the need to build students’ self-confidence through course interventions or projects in the first two years of computer science study.
Kapoor and Gardner-McCune [60]: Understanding Professional Identities and Goals of Computer Science Undergraduate Students (2018)
Intention: The study examines the relationship between career goals and student identity in order to draw conclusions about the design of curricula and retention programs.
Method/Participants: Surveys, Interviews/Beginners
Identity Development or Usage: Concept Refinement
Framework and Adjacent Concepts: Lave & Wenger/Retention, Diversity
Results: CS undergraduate students have various professional goals; their career goals depend on their professional identities. The authors suggest that current curricula be adapted to help students accomplish their career goals by offering specializations.
Kinnunen et al. [63]: Understanding initial undergraduate expectations and identity in computing studies (2018)
Intention: This study addresses the need for a better understanding of students’ expectations, particularly their views of the field of computer science, through insights into their identities as computer science students and future professionals.
Method/Participants: Surveys, Essays/Beginners
Identity Development or Usage: As Explanation for Other Concepts
Framework and Adjacent Concepts: Lave & Wenger/Recruitment, Retention
Results: Students expect not only to be trained in aspects such as programming or systems development, but also to gain insights that go beyond the technical, such as the role that computer science can play in society. It is also apparent that students are not looking for specific job positions, but rather relate their future aspirations to specific types of work environments or job characteristics.
Kramer et al. [66]: A Narrative-Style Exploration of Undergraduate Engineering Students’ Beliefs about Smartness and Identity (2019)
Intention: The article presents the results of a narrative study of engineering students’ educational trajectories in relation to their conceptions of intelligence and identity. The authors aim at better understanding the nuanced interaction between these constructs.
Method/Participants: Interviews, Surveys/Beginners
Identity Development or Usage: As Explanation for Other Concepts
Framework and Adjacent Concepts: Gee/Beliefs about Ability and Smartness, Curriculum design
Results: Social experiences were found to have a significant impact on one’s identity and confidence in one’s intelligence. Of particular note are the female participants whose social isolation in engineering courses had a negative impact on their identity and beliefs.
Lewis et al. [70]: “I Don’t Code All Day”: Fitting in Computer Science When the Stereotypes Don’t Fit (2016)
Intention: The article argues that, instead of changing stereotypes, it may be possible to challenge students’ beliefs that stereotypes of CS are relevant to whether they can become a computer scientist.
Method/Participants: Interviews/Beginners
Identity Development or Usage: As Theoretical Lens
Framework and Adjacent Concepts: Sfard & Prusak/Retention, Diversity
Results: From the student interviews (and therefore from their perspective), the article identifies four characteristics to fit into CS: singularly focused on CS, asocial, competitive, male. It is discussed that some students have been able to reject these stereotypes and still feel they “fit in”, especially when they know different role models.
Loui [72]: Ethics and the Development of Professional Identities of Engineering Students (2005)
Intention: The study presents a project in which students in an engineering ethics class discuss questions about the characteristics and responsibilities of professional engineers.
Method/Participants: Essays/Beginners, Advanced
Identity Development or Usage: Concept Expansion
Framework and Adjacent Concepts: No Framework/Professional identity, Four-stage model of role acquisition
Results: The results show that students learn about professionalism mainly from relatives and colleagues who are engineers, and rarely from technical engineering courses. Furthermore, by analyzing cases in groups and listening to different perspectives, some students understand professional responsibility at the end of the course not only as liability for mistakes, but in a broader sense as responsibility to society.
Mahadeo et al. [73]: Developing a Computing Identity Framework: Understanding Computer Science and Information Technology Career Choice (2020)
Intention: The authors adapt theory from science and engineering identity theory to present a construct for computing identity and empirically validate a related instrument.
Method/Participants: Surveys/Beginners
Identity Development or Usage: Construct Refinement
Framework and Adjacent Concepts: Hazari (Science/Engineering Identity)/Diversity, Retention
Results: The article reports on the instruments’ development and validation, as well as on evidence that there are three subconstructs of Computing Identity.
Maher et al. [74]: The Connected Learner (2016)
Intention: Evaluation of a comprehensive intervention that focuses on increasing student connection and innovative teaching methods to help students form an identity.
Method/Participants: Surveys/Beginners, Advanced, Professional
Identity Development or Usage: Unclear
Framework and Adjacent Concepts: Lave & Wenger/Retention
Results: The author share preliminary results indicating that their intervention works.
McCartney and Sanders [78]: School/Work: Development of Computing Students’ Professional Identity at University (2015)
Intention: This case study attempts to identify events that have had a significant impact on students’ development during university computer science education.
Method/Participants: Interviews/Beginners
Identity Development or Usage: As Theoretical Lens
Framework and Adjacent Concepts: No Framework/Professional identity, Three dimensions of becoming an engineer
Results: Career-related factors appear to be more important than expected. Moreover, the authors report a complex interrelationship between these factors and the courses chosen. Courses influence students’ perceptions of the world of work, and actual work experiences have an impact on students’ expectations of their education.
Meharg et al. [80]: “So far back, I’m anonymous”: Exploring Student Identity using Photovoice (2018)
Intention: The authors aim at investigating student identity in the transitional context of transfer students.
Method/Participants: Photovoice/Advanced
Identity Development or Usage: Unclear (Usage)
Framework and Adjacent Concepts: Gee, Identity formation through Crisis/Transition, College transfer
Results: College transfer students have different educational experiences and identity development. The authors suggest that institutions should pay particular attention to their needs.
Mishra [81]: Professional identity construction among software engineering students: A study in India (2016)
Intention: This study examines the process by which final year software engineering students construct their professional identities and explains the process of “identity morphing” as a mechanism by which students resolve the conflict/violation of their identities.
Method/Participants: Interviews/Advanced
Identity Development or Usage: Concept Expansion
Framework and Adjacent Concepts: No Framework/Professional identity
Results: The article suggests that derived self-esteem and perceived competence influence an individual’s identity transition. The authors report on evidence in their data that individuals with higher levels of perceived competence had less conflict in their identity building process.
Nelson et al. [85]: A Qualitative Investigation on the Effectiveness of a Computing Identity Development Emailing List for African American Computer Scientists (2019)
Intention: This article presents a qualitative interview study focused on African American doctoral students in computer science.
Method/Participants: Surveys, Interviews/Professionals
Identity Development or Usage: As Basis for Interventions
Framework and Adjacent Concepts: No Framework/Resilience, Diversity
Results: The authors’ findings suggest that African American computer science identity can be effectively maintained within this intervention by providing a sense of belonging to the community, enabling optimistic outlooks, and promoting self-efficacy.
Nylén et al. [86]: Why are We Here? The Educational Value Model (EVM) as a Framework to Investigate the Role of Students’ Professional Identity Development (2018)
Intention: The authors note that “the goal of professional identity development” is usually not reached during CS higher education and provide an analysis that points to factors that explain this situation.
Method/Participants: Literature Review/No Participants
Identity Development or Usage: Concept Expansion
Framework and Adjacent Concepts: Not coded/Belonging, Motivation
Results: Based on the literature review and identified challenges, the article provides a theoretical framework to describe professional identity development in university education.
Parker [89]: Who I Am Becoming, Now: Toward a Computer Science Professional Identity Instrument (2018)
Intention: Description of the development and preliminary results of a professional identity survey instrument.
Method/Participants: Surveys, Interviews/Beginners, Advanced
Identity Development or Usage: Concept Refinement
Framework and Adjacent Concepts: Lave & Wenger/Career planning, Retention
Results: Future career goals and job titles, as well as how peers and supervisors perceive one’s role, shape professional identity.
Parker [88]: How Do You Feel: Affective Expressions from Computer Science Senior Capstone Projects (2017)
Intention: In the context of final projects, the authors examine affective response as a factor leading to engagement and the formation of a professional identity during the transition from university to professional life.
Method/Participants: Interviews/Advanced
Identity Development or Usage: As Basis for Interventions
Framework and Adjacent Concepts: Lave & Wenger/Interest, Engagement
Results: Respondents experienced a range of affective responses during their project experience and their engagement appeared to be related to the impact of project outcomes. Thus, the capstone experience in such a real-world project is highlighted as a turning point in the trajectory of these students and represents “a bridge between the academic and professional communities of practice.”
Peters [93]: Students’ Experience of Participation in a Discipline–A Longitudinal Study of Computer Science and IT Engineering Students (2018)
Intention: The study follows students over time to capture their experiences of participation (as defined by Lave and Wenger) and how they change over the course of their studies.
Method/Participants: Self-reports, Interviews/Beginners, Advanced
Identity Development or Usage: Concept Refinement
Framework and Adjacent Concepts: Lave & Wenger/Retention, Diversity, Participation
Results: Besides an insightful theory section the article presents a comprehensive long-term study with several phenomenographic outcome spaces as results and an interesting discussion of the findings.
Peters and Pears [97]: Engagement in Computer Science and IT—What! A Matter of Identity? (2013)
Intention: The article develops and illustrates the use of a new theoretical framework (Enwistle and Lave/Wenger) to systematically study the development of student identity in Computer Science and IT.
Method/Participants: Self-Report (Reflections)/Beginners
Identity Development or Usage: As Theoretical Lens
Framework and Adjacent Concepts: Lave & Wenger, Enwistle/Recruitment, Belonging
Results: The article investigated that students collectively express conceptions of knowledge, as being absolute and provided by the university, which may imply a less sophisticated conception of learning. Furthermore, two groups of students with different negotiations of meaning are identified and discussed.
Peters et al. [96]: Preparing the Global Software Engineer (2015)
Intention: This study assesses student evaluations and reflections on a course in which students worked on a real-world problem in collaboration with a local client. The focus is on students’ perceptions of software engineering, the perceived relevance of a global learning experience, and their role in reshaping their identities as global software engineers.
Method/Participants: Self-reports/Beginners, Advanced
Identity Development or Usage: As Basis for Interventions
Framework and Adjacent Concepts: Flanagan (Critical Incident Analysis)/Curriculum Design
Results: The analysis shows that educating the global software engineer is a complex endeavor. However, means of designing and assessing courses aimed at supporting students on their path to becoming global software engineers are presented.
Peters et al. [95]: Second year computer science and IT students’ experience of participation in the discipline (2015)
Intention: The authors describe the participation experiences of second year computing students, and discuss participation as part of a broader goal of understanding the identity development of computing students.
Method/Participants: Interviews, Surveys/Beginners
Identity Development or Usage: As Theoretical Lens
Framework and Adjacent Concepts: Lave & Wenger/Motivation, Belonging
Results: The article provides nuanced reflections on practices and participation in CS, and specifically the practice of problem solving as part of students’ identity development.
Peters et al. [94]: First Year Computer Science and IT Students’ of Participation in the Discipline (2014)
Intention: The goal of this article is to analyze a specific aspect of the student experience, participation, in order to gain a better understanding of how computer science and IT students engage with CS prior to and during their studies.
Method/Participants: Surveys, Interviews/Beginners
Identity Development or Usage: As Theoretical Lens
Framework and Adjacent Concepts: Lave & Wenger/Motivation, Belonging
Results: The article presents different experiences of student participation as a table.
Rodriguez and Lehman [103]: Developing the next generation of diverse computer scientists: the need for enhanced, intersectional computing identity theory (2017)
Intention: This theoretical article explores the need for an enhanced, intersectional theory of computing identity in order to develop a diverse group of computer scientists for the future.
Method/Participants: Literature Review/No Participants
Identity Development or Usage: As Theoretical Lens
Framework and Adjacent Concepts: Not coded/Diversity, Retention
Results: The article identifies a lack of intersectionality in current research, as well as of literature specific to computing identity, and recommends responding with further research from an intersectional perspective.
Rohde et al. [105]: Design Experiences, Engineering Identity, and Belongingness in Early Career Electrical and Computer Engineering Students (2019)
Intention: The authors examine the role of design experiences for identification and belongingness in engineering and the meaning of identification and belongingness for students.
Method/Participants: Surveys, Interviews/Beginners
Identity Development or Usage: Concept Expansion
Framework and Adjacent Concepts: Lave & Wenger/Retention, Belonging, Design Experience
Results: The authors conclude that design experiences lead to a stronger sense of belonging and move students from the periphery to the center of the CS community of practice.
Scott and Ghinea [108]: Measuring enrichment: the assembly and validation of an instrument to assess student self-beliefs in CS1 (2014)
Intention: The article begins with the observation that self-beliefs may have an impact on academic success. Since there is no valid instrument to measure these beliefs, the authors attempt to fill this gap.
Method/Participants: Surveys/Beginners
Identity Development or Usage: As Basis for Interventions
Framework and Adjacent Concepts: Control-Value Theory of Achievement Emotion/Interest, Mindset, Improved learning
Results: The article develops an instrument, but it is not documented in the appendix or by a link. The specific utility (e.g., reasons for use) of the instrument remains vague.
Sinclair and Kalvala [111]: Exploring societal factors affecting the experience and engagement of first year female computer science undergraduates (2015)
Intention: Based on a study with beginning students conducted in the UK, socio-cultural factors influencing study and CS identity are identified. Special attention is given to gender differences.
Method/Participants: Surveys/Beginners
Identity Development or Usage: As Theoretical Lens
Framework and Adjacent Concepts: Carlone & Johnson, Gee/Retention, Diversity
Results: The article identifies a variety of issues related to the situation of women in computer science studies and identifies specific starting points for future interventions.
Smith-Orr and Garnett [112]: Motivation and identity in C++ the effects of music in an engineering classroom (2016)
Intention: The article used a model of academic motivation (MUSIC) to guide course design within an introductory programming class in an attempt to increase engineering identity and sense of belonging among engineering students.
Method/Participants: Surveys/Beginners
Identity Development or Usage: Concept Refinement
Framework and Adjacent Concepts: MUSIC framework/Belonging, Motivation
Results: The authors note that the students’ motivation (according to MUSIC) increased, but their sense of belonging and identity decreased; their intervention failed.
Taheri et al. [117]: A Structural Equation Model Analysis of Computing Identity Sub-Constructs and Student Academic Persistence (2018)
Intention: This research report examines the impact of CS identity on the persistence of computer science students by analyzing the effects of achievement/competence, recognition, interest, and sense of belonging on the academic persistence of computer science students.
Method/Participants: Surveys/Beginners, Advanced
Identity Development or Usage: Construct Definition, Refinement or Expansion
Framework and Adjacent Concepts: Carlone & Johnson/Retention, Persistence
Results: The results indicate that the authors’ CS identity model is consistent with previous research on disciplinary identity and that students’ academic persistence is directly influenced by their interest. The authors consider their model to be a useful analytical lens for further curricular and extracurricular activities.
Tate and Linn [118]: How Does Identity Shape the Experiences of Women of Color Engineering Students? (2005)
Intention: This study seeks to understand the experiences of women of color engineering students who persist and to identify some of the dilemmas they face.
Method/Participants: Interviews/Advanced
Identity Development or Usage: As Theoretical Lens
Framework and Adjacent Concepts: Lave & Wenger/Diversity
Results: This study of women of color engineering students reveals how interactions between academic, intellectual and social identities jointly influence perceptions of educational experiences and career aspirations.
Taylor-Smith et al. [119]: Identity and Belonging for Graduate Apprenticeships in Computing (2019)
Intention: This study explores how Graduate Apprenticeship (GA) students experience their association with the university and their identities as students, but also as employees.
Method/Participants: Interviews/Advanced
Identity Development or Usage: Unclear
Framework and Adjacent Concepts: Stryker & Burke/Retention, Belonging
Results: Here the authors consider a cohort of CS students who are pursuing vocational training on the side. They hypothesize that these students acquire a strong IT professional identity in the workplace that also supports their development at the university. The analysis revealed that the students define themselves differently from traditional student identities and that there is a strong sense of belonging to their fellow students who are also in vocational education.
Tokmic et al. [120]: Salient Measures of an Engaged Computing Education Community (2019)
Intention: This article presents the measurement and analysis of a comprehensive model of pedagogical change in the computing college and discusses how studying the construct of professional identity contributes to the knowledge base of the computing education community.
Method/Participants: Surveys/Beginners
Identity Development or Usage: Concept Expansion
Framework and Adjacent Concepts: No Framework/Professional identity, Engagement, Curriculum design
Results: The authors see the contribution of their work as defining peer learning and professional identity in computer science and providing computer science education with measures of psycho-social factors known to be important in the development of computer science students.
Tonso [121]: Student Engineers and Engineer Identity - Campus Engineer Identities as Figured World (2006)
Intention: This study attempts to explain the complex process of identity formation on a campus. The author examines how student engineers are recognized as engineers and how they already perceive themselves as engineers through their actions.
Method/Participants: Observation, Interviews/Beginners, Advanced
Identity Development or Usage: Concept Location
Framework and Adjacent Concepts: Holland et al./Belonging, Motivation
Results: The preferred campus lifestyle has a tremendous impact not only on the individual as a student, but also on his or her career as an engineer. The author describes identity formation on campus as a process in which the individual’s self-concept as an engineer leads to representations of the engineering self, and recognition as an engineer conveys a sense of belonging.
Ulriksen et al. [123]: What do we know about explanations for drop out/opt out among young people from STM higher education programmes? (2010)
Intention: The article provides a general overview on understandings of drop out/opt out from science, technology and mathematics (STM) higher education programs, by reviewing existing literature.
Method/Participants: Literature Review/No Participants
Identity Development or Usage: As Theoretical Lens
Framework and Adjacent Concepts: Not coded /Retention
Results: The authors conclude, that dropping out or opting out is influenced by a number of factors and interactions. However, identity construction is a relevant and underestimated factor.
Vesisenaho et al. [126]: Need for Study and Career Counselling in Computer Science (2009)
Intention: The article examines the relationship between career counseling methods and retention/motivation.
Method/Participants: Surveys/Beginners, Advanced
Identity Development or Usage: Unclear
Framework and Adjacent Concepts: No Framework/Career planing, Retention, Motivation
Results: There is no evidence on the use or development of the identity concept, but the authors recommend that CS training and curricula be viewed more from a career/professional perspective.
Washington et al. [127]: The Computer Science Attitude and Identity Survey (CSAIS): A Novel Tool for Measuring the Impact of Ethnic Identity in Underrepresented Computer Science Students (2016)
Intention: The purpose of this study is to measure the impact of ethnic identity on perceptions of CS as a subject and the decision to pursue it. Therefore, the CSAIS was developed to measure five important constructs that influence the attitudes and identity of CS undergraduate students of color.
Method/Participants: Surveys/Beginners
Identity Development or Usage: As Theoretical Lens
Framework and Adjacent Concepts: Collective identity/Diversity
Results: In addition to a comprehensive discussion of the identity of students of color, the authors present the instrument they developed, the “Computer Science Attitude and Identity Survey”.

References

[1]
Kwame Anthony Appiah. 2018. The Lies that Bind: Rethinking Identity. Profile Books.
[2]
Jane M. Armstrong and Richard A. Price. 1982. Correlates and predictors of women’s mathematics participation. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 13, 2 (1982), 99–109. DOI:
[3]
Jeffrey Jensen Arnett. 2014. Emerging Adulthood: The Winding Road from the Late Teens through the Twenties. Oxford University Press.
[4]
Lucy Avraamidou. 2014. Studying science teacher identity: Current insights and future research directions. Studies in Science Education 50, 2 (2014), 145–179. DOI:
[5]
Joseph A. Bailey. 2003. Self-image, self-concept, and self-identity revisited. Journal of the National Medical Association 95, 5 (2003), 383–6.
[6]
Roy F. Baumeister. 1997. Chapter 26 - Identity, Self-concept, and Self-esteem: The Self Lost and Found. Academic Press, San Diego, 681–710. DOI:
[7]
Maureen Biggers, Anne Brauer, and Tuba Yilmaz. 2008. Student Perceptions of computer science: A retention study comparing graduating seniors with Cs leavers. In Proceedings of the 39th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education.Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 402–406. DOI:
[8]
Jo Boaler. 2000. Multiple Perspectives on Mathematics Teaching and Learning. Vol. 1. Greenwood Publishing Group.
[9]
Kristy Elizabeth Boyer, E. Nathan Thomas, Audrey S. Rorrer, Deonte Cooper, and Mladen A. Vouk. 2010. Increasing technical excellence, leadership and commitment of computing students through identity-based mentoring. In Proceedings of the 41st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 167–171.
[10]
Eileen D. Bunderson and Mary Elizabeth Christensen. 1995. An analysis of retention problems for female students in university computer science programs. Journal of Research on Computing in Education 28, 1 (1995), 1–18.
[11]
Jennifer Burg, V. Paúl Pauca, William Turkett, Errin Fulp, Samuel S. Cho, Peter Santago, Daniel Cañas, and H. Donald Gage. 2015. Engaging non-traditional students in computer science through socially-inspired learning and sustained mentoring. In Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education.Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 639–644. DOI:
[12]
Brenda M. Capobianco. 2006. Undergraduate women engineering their professional identities. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 12, 2–3 (2006), 95–117.
[13]
Brenda M. Capobianco, Heidi A. Diefes-Dux, and Meara M. Habashi. 2009. Generating measures of engineering identity development among young learners. In Proceedings of the 2009 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. 1–6. DOI:ISSN: 2377-634X.
[14]
Brenda M. Capobianco, Brian F. French, and Heidi A. Diefes-Du. 2012. Engineering identity development among pre-adolescent learners. Journal of Engineering Education 101, 4 (2012), 698–716. DOI:
[15]
Heidi B. Carlone. 2012. Methodological considerations for studying identities in school science: An anthropological approach. In Proceedings of the Identity Construction and Science Education Research. Maria Varelas (Ed.), SensePublishers, Rotterdam and Boston, 9–26.
[16]
Heidi B. Carlone and Angela Johnson. 2007. Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 44, 8 (2007), 1187–1218. DOI:
[17]
Heidi B. Carlone, Catherine M. Scott, and Cassi Lowder. 2014. Becoming (less) scientific: A longitudinal study of students’ identity work from elementary to middle school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 51, 7 (2014), 836–869. DOI:
[18]
Nathan Hyungsok Choe and Maura Borrego. 2019. Prediction of engineering identity in engineering graduate students. IEEE Transactions on Education 62, 3 (2019), 181–187.
[19]
Anna Chronaki and David Kollosche. 2019. Refusing mathematics: A discourse theory approach on the politics of identity work. ZDM 51, 3 (2019), 457–468. DOI:
[20]
Abigail Clark and Rachel Louis Kajfez. 2019. Engineering identity in pre-college students: A literature review. In Proceedings of the ASEE 2019 Annual Conference.
[21]
J. McGrath Cohoon and William Aspray. 2006. Women and Information Technology: Research on Underrepresentation. Vol. 1. The MIT Press.
[22]
J. McGrath Cohoon, Monica Nable, and Paul Boucher. 2011. Conflicted identities and sexism in computing graduate programs. In Proceedings of the 2011 Frontiers in Education Conference. IEEE, S1H–1.
[23]
Lee J. Cronbach and Paul E. Meehl. 1955. Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin 52, 4 (1955), 281.
[24]
Richard L. Cruess, Sylvia R. Cruess, and Yvonne Steinert. 2016. Amending miller’s pyramid to include professional identity formation. Academic Medicine 91, 2 (2016), 180–185. Retrieved from https://journals.lww.com/academicmedicine/Fulltext/2016/02000/Amending_Miller_s_Pyramid_to_Include_Professional.17.aspx.
[25]
Robert Cummings, Byron M. Lowens, Whitney Nelson, and Kinnis Gosha. 2019. Computing resilient identity development and maintenance of black americans who earned A Ph. D. in computing. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. IEEE, 1–8.
[26]
Anna T. Danielsson, Heather King, Spela Godec, and Anne-Sofie Nyström. 2023. The identity turn in science education research: A critical review of methodologies in a consolidating field. Cultural Studies of Science EducationDOI:
[27]
Lisa Darragh. 2016. Identity research in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics 93, 1(2016), 19–33. DOI:
[28]
Don Davis, Timothy Yuen, and Matthew Berland. 2014. Multiple case study of nerd identity in a CS1 class. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 325–330.
[29]
Jane E. Dutton, Janet M. Dukerich, and Celia V. Harquail. 1994. Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly 23, 2 (1994), 239–263.
[30]
J. Eccles. 1983. Achievement and achievement motives: Psychological and sociological approaches. W. H. Freeman and Company, Chapter Expectancies, values and academic behaviors, 75–146.
[31]
Jacquelynne S. Eccles. 2009. Who am i and what am i going to do with my life? Personal and Collective Identities as Motivators of Action. Educational Psychologist 44, 2 (2009), 78–89. DOI:
[32]
Jacquelynne S. Eccles and Allan Wigfield. 2020. From expectancy-value theory to situated expectancy-value theory: A developmental, social cognitive, and sociocultural perspective on motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology 61, 1 (2020), 101859. DOI:
[33]
Yrjö Engeström. 2014. Learning by Expanding: An Activity-Theoretical Approach to Developmental Research (2 ed.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. DOI:
[34]
Noel Entwistle. 2007. Conceptions of learning and the experience of understanding: Thresholds, contextual influences, and knowledge objects. (2007).
[35]
E.H. Erikson. 1968. Identity: Youth and Crisis. Norton & Co., Oxford, England.
[36]
Allan Fisher and Jane Margolis. 2002. Unlocking the clubhouse: The carnegie mellon experience. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 34, 2(2002), 79–83. DOI:
[37]
John C. Flanagan. 1954. The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin 51, 4 (1954), 327.
[38]
Hanoch Flum and Avi Kaplan. 2012. Identity formation in educational settings: A contextualized view of theory and research in practice. Contemporary Educational Psychology 37, 3 (2012), 240–245. DOI:. Identity Formation in Educational Settings.
[39]
Trine Foyn, Yvette Solomon, and Hans Jørgen Braathe. 2018. Clever girls’ stories: The girl they call a nerd. Educational Studies in Mathematics 98, 1 (2018), 77–93. DOI:
[40]
Francis Fukuyama. 2018. Identity: The Demand for Dignity and the Politics of Resentment. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
[41]
Atalie Garcia, M. Ross, Z. Hazari, M. Weiss, Kenneth Christensen, and M. Georgiopoulos. 2018. Examining the computing identity of high-achieving underserved computing students on the basis of gender, field, and year in school. Collaborative Network for Engineering and Computing Diversity (2018).
[42]
James Paul Gee. 2000. Chapter 3: Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education 25, 1 (2000), 99–125.
[43]
Michail Giannakos, Ilias Pappas, Maria Letizia Jaccheri, and Demetrios Sampson. 2017. Understanding student retention in computer science education: The role of environment, gains, barriers and usefulness. Education and Information Technologies 22, 5 (92017), 2365–2382.
[44]
Lara Gildehaus. 2021. Identität als Perspektive zur Genese individueller Wertehierarchien im Mathematikstudium. In Proceedings of the Beiträge zum Mathematikunterricht 2021.Silke Ruwisch & Susanne Prediger Kerstin Hein, Cathleen Heil (Ed.), WTM-Verlag, Münster, Online unter https://eldorado.tu--dortmund.de/handle/2003/30630.
[45]
Lara Gildehaus and Michael Liebendörfer. 2021. “I don’t need this” – understanding preservice teachers disaffection with university mathematics. In Proceedings of the 44th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education.Changsri N. & Boonsena N. Inprasitha, M. (Ed.), PME, Khon Kaen, 350–359.
[46]
Allison Godwin, Geoff Potvin, Zahra Hazari, and Robynne Lock. 2016. Identity, critical agency, and engineering: An affective model for predicting engineering as a career choice. Journal of Engineering Education 105, 2 (2016), 312–340. DOI:
[47]
Heather Honoré Goltz and Matthew Lee Smith. 2014. Forming and developing your professional identity: Easy as PI. Health Promotion Practice 15, 6 (2014), 785–789.
[48]
Don Gotterbarn, Amy Bruckman, Catherine Flick, Keith Miller, and Marty J. Wolf. 2017. ACM code of Ethics: A guide for positive action. Communications of the ACM 61, 1(2017), 121–128. DOI:
[49]
Gregor Große-Bölting, Yannick Schneider, and Andreas Mühling. 2019. It’s like computers speak a different language: Beginning students’ conceptions of computer science. In Proceedings of the 19th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research.Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 5 pages. DOI:
[50]
Gregor Große-Bölting, Yannick Schneider, and Andreas Mühling. 2020. Beginning students’ conceptions of computer science: The effect of the first semester. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering. Ho-Chi-Minh-City; Vietnam.
[51]
G. Große-Bölting, D. Gerstenberger, L. Gildehaus, A. Mühling, and C. Schulte. 2021. Identity in K-12 computer education research: A systematic literature review. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research.Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY.
[52]
K. Vernard Harrington, Tracy Lewis, Wanda Smith, and France Belanger. 2007. A qualitative analysis of computing students’ professional identity and its relationship to strategies for coping with stressors in the computing disciplines. AMCIS 2007 Proceedings 2 (2007), 492.
[53]
Zahra Hazari, Gerhard Sonnert, Philip M. Sadler, and Marie-Claire Shanahan. 2010. Connecting high school physics experiences, outcome expectations, physics identity, and physics career choice: A gender study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 47, 8 (2010), 978–1003.
[54]
Michael Hewner. 2013. Undergraduate conceptions of the field of computer science. In Proceedings of the 9th Annual International ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research.Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 107–114. DOI:DOI:
[55]
Maureen P. Hogan. 2008. The tale of two noras: How a Yup’ik middle schooler was differently constructed as a math learner. Diaspora, Indigenous, and Minority Education 2, 2 (2008), 90–114. DOI:
[56]
Dorothy C. Holland, William Lachicotte Jr, Debra Skinner, and Carole Cain. 2001. Identity and Agency in Cultural Worlds. Harvard University Press.
[57]
Bryce E. Hughes, William J. Schell, and Brett Tallman. 2018. Development of leadership self-efficacy: Comparing engineers, other stem, and non-stem majors. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. IEEE, 1–5.
[58]
Herminia Ibarra. 1999. Provisional selves: Experimenting with image and identity in professional adaptation. Administrative Science Quarterly 44, 4 (1999), 764–791.
[59]
Jingoo Kang, Tuula Keinonen, and Anssi Salonen. 2019. Role of interest and self-concept in predicting science aspirations: Gender study. Research in Science Education 51, 1 (2019), 513–535. DOI:
[60]
Amanpreet Kapoor and Christina Gardner-McCune. 2018. Understanding professional identities and goals of computer science undergraduate students. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 191–196.
[61]
Amanpreet Kapoor and Christina Gardner-McCune. 2019. Understanding CS undergraduate students’ professional identity through the lens of their professional development. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education. 9–15.
[62]
Amanpreet Kapoor and Christina Gardner-Mccune. 2022. Categorizing research on identity in undergraduate computing education. In Proceedings of the 22nd Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research.Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 13 pages. DOI:
[63]
Päivi Kinnunen, Matthew Butler, Michael Morgan, Aletta Nylen, Anne-Kathrin Peters, Jane Sinclair, Sara Kalvala, and Erkki Pesonen. 2018. Understanding initial undergraduate expectations and identity in computing studies. European Journal of Engineering Education 43, 2 (2018), 201–218.
[64]
Barbara Kitchenham. 2004. Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele, UK, Keele Univ. 33(2004).
[65]
Siu Cheung Kong and Yi Qing Wang. 2020. Formation of computational identity through computational thinking perspectives development in programming learning: A mediation analysis among primary school students. Computers in Human Behavior 106, 1 (2020), 106230. DOI:
[66]
Amy Kramer, Cassie Wallwey, Genevieve Thanh, Emily Dringenberg, and Rachel Kajfez. 2019. A narrative-style exploration of undergraduate engineering students’ beliefs about smartness and identity. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. IEEE, 1–9.
[67]
Jean Lave and Etienne Wenger. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. DOI:
[68]
Luzia Leifheit, Katerina Tsarava, Manuel Ninaus, Klaus Ostermann, Jessika Golle, Ulrich Trautwein, and Korbinian Moeller. 2020. SCAPA: Development of a questionnaire assessing self-concept and attitudes toward programming. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education.Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 138–144. DOI:
[69]
Colleen Lewis, Paul Bruno, Jonathan Raygoza, and Julia Wang. 2019. Alignment of goals and perceptions of computing predicts students’ sense of belonging in computing. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research.Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 11–19. DOI:
[70]
Colleen M. Lewis, Ruth E. Anderson, and Ken Yasuhara. 2016. “I Don’t Code All Day” fitting in computer science when the stereotypes don’t fit. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research. 23–32.
[71]
Lilian L. Pozzer and Phoebe A. Jackson. 2015. Conceptualizing identity in science education research: Theoretical and methodological issues. In Proceedings of the Sociocultural Studies and Implications for Science Education.Catherine Milne, Kenneth Tobin, and Donna DeGennaro (Eds.), Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 213–230.
[72]
Michael C. Loui. 2005. Ethics and the development of professional identities of engineering students. Journal of Engineering Education 94, 4 (2005), 383–390.
[73]
Jonathan Mahadeo, Zahra Hazari, and Geoff Potvin. 2020. Developing a computing identity framework: Understanding computer science and information technology career choice. ACM Transactions on Computing Education 20, 1(2020), 14 pages. DOI:
[74]
Mary Lou Maher, Bojan Cukic, Larry Mays, Steven Rogelberg, Celine Latulipe, Jamie Payton, Audrey Rorrer, and Tonya Frevert. 2016. The connected learner: Engaging faculty to connect computing students to peers, profession and purpose. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. IEEE, 1–8.
[75]
James E. Marcia. 1966. Development and validation of ego-identity status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 3, 5 (1966), 551.
[76]
Eric Margolis and Stephen Laurence. 2021. Concepts. In Proceedings of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2021 ed.).Edward N. Zalta (Ed.), Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
[77]
Philipp Mayring. 2014. Qualitative content analysis: Theoretical Foundation, Basic Procedures and Software Solution. AUT.
[78]
Robert McCartney and Kate Sanders. 2015. School/work: Development of computing students’ professional identity at university. In Proceedings of the 11th Annual International Conference on International Computing Education Research. 151–159.
[79]
George H. Mead. 1913. The social self. The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 10, 14 (1913), 374–380.
[80]
Debbie Meharg, Sandra Cairncross, and Alison Varey. 2018. “So far back, I’m anonymous”: Exploring student identity using photovoice. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. IEEE, 1–9.
[81]
Gunjan Tomer Sushanta Kumar Mishra. 2016. Professional identity construction among software engineering students: A study in India. Information Technology & People 29, 1 (2016), 146–172.
[82]
John R. Morelock. 2017. A systematic literature review of engineering identity: Definitions, factors, and interventions affecting development, and means of measurement. European Journal of Engineering Education 42, 6(2017), 1240–1262. DOI:
[83]
Erica Mourão, João Felipe Pimentel, Leonardo Murta, Marcos Kalinowski, Emilia Mendes, and Claes Wohlin. 2020. On the performance of hybrid search strategies for systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Information and Software Technology 123, 1 (2020), 106294.
[84]
Greg L. Nelson and Andrew J. Ko. 2018. On use of theory in computing education research. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research.Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 31–39. DOI:
[85]
Whitney Nelson, Robert T. Cummings, and Kinnis Gosha. 2019. A qualitative investigation on the effectiveness of a computing identity development emailing list for african american computer scientists. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. IEEE, 1–7.
[86]
Aletta Nylén, Mats Daniels, Arnold Pears, Åsa Cajander, Roger McDermott, and Ville Isomöttönen. 2018. Why are we here? the educational value model (EVM) as a framework to investigate the role of students’ professional identity development. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. IEEE, 1–8.
[87]
Daphna Oyserman, Kristen Elmore, and Smith. 2012. Self, self-concept, and identity. In Proceedings of the Handbook of Self and Identity. 69–104.
[88]
Rick Parker. 2017. How do you feel: Affective expressions from computer science senior capstone projects. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering. IEEE, 35–42.
[89]
Rick Parker. 2018. Who i am becoming, now: Toward a computer science professional identity instrument. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. IEEE, 1–9.
[90]
Anita Patrick and Maura Borrego. 2016. A review of the literature relevant to engineering identity. In Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference.
[91]
Reinhard Pekrun and Raymond P. Perry. 2014. Control-value theory of achievement emotions. In Proceedings of the International Handbook of Emotions in Education. Routledge, 130–151.
[92]
Anne-Kathrin Peters. 2017. Learning computing at university: Participation and identity: A longitudinal study phdthesis. Uppsala Computing Education Research Group (UpCERG). http://uu.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:1149512
[93]
Anne-Kathrin Peters. 2018. Students’ experience of participation in a discipline–a longitudinal study of computer science and IT engineering students. ACM Transactions on Computing Education 19, 1 (2018), 1–28.
[94]
Anne-Kathrin Peters, Anders Berglund, Anna Eckerdal, and Arnold Pears. 2014. First year computer science and IT students’ experience of participation in the discipline. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Teaching and Learning in Computing and Engineering. IEEE, 1–8.
[95]
Anne-Kathrin Peters, Anders Berglund, Anna Eckerdal, and Arnold Pears. 2015. Second year computer science and it students’ experience of participation in the discipline. In Proceedings of the 15th Koli Calling Conference on Computing Education Research. 68–76.
[96]
Anne-Kathrin Peters, Waqar Hussain, Asa Cajander, Tony Clear, and Mats Daniels. 2015. Preparing the global software engineer. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 10th International Conference on Global Software Engineering. IEEE, 61–70.
[97]
Anne-Kathrin Peters and Arnold Pears. 2013. Engagement in computer science and it–what! a matter of identity?. In Proceedings of the 2013 Learning and Teaching in Computing and Engineering. IEEE, 114–121.
[98]
Patrice Potvin, Abdelkrim Hasni, Ousmane Sy, and Martin Riopel. 2018. Two crucial years of science and technology schooling: A longitudinal study of the major influences on and interactions between self-concept, interest, and the intention to pursue S&T. Research in Science Education(2018). DOI:
[99]
Darinka Radovic, Laura Black, Julian Williams, and Christian E. Salas. 2018. Towards conceptual coherence in the research on mathematics learner identity: A systematic review of the literature. Educational Studies in Mathematics 99, 1(2018), 21–42. DOI:
[100]
Inioluwa Deborah Raji, Morgan Klaus Scheuerman, and Razvan Amironesei. 2021. You can’t sit with us: Exclusionary pedagogy in AI ethics education. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency.Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 515–525. DOI:
[101]
Kristy A. Robinson, You-kyung Lee, Emily A. Bovee, Tony Perez, S. Patrick Walton, Daina Briedis, and Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia. 2019. Motivation in transition: Development and roles of expectancy, task values, and costs in early college engineering. Journal of Educational Psychology 111, 6 (2019), 1081–1102. DOI:
[102]
Kristy A. Robinson, Tony Perez, Amy K. Nuttall, Cary J. Roseth, and Lisa Linnenbrink-Garcia. 2018. From science student to scientist: Predictors and outcomes of heterogeneous science identity trajectories in college. Developmental Psychology 54, 10 (2018), 1977–1992. DOI:
[103]
Sarah L. Rodriguez and Kathleen Lehman. 2017. Developing the next generation of diverse computer scientists: The need for enhanced, intersectional computing identity theory. Computer Science Education 27, 3–4 (2017), 229–247.
[104]
Sarah L. Rodriguez, Charles Lu, and Morgan Bartlett. 2018. Engineering identity development: A review of the higher education literature. International journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology 6, 3 (2018), 254–265.
[105]
Jacqueline Rohde, Lisa Musselman, Brianna Benedict, Dina Verdín, Allison Godwin, Adam Kirn, Lisa Benson, and Geoff Potvin. 2019. Design experiences, engineering identity, and belongingness in early career electrical and computer engineering students. IEEE Transactions on Education 62, 3 (2019), 165–172.
[106]
Edgar H. Schein. 1978. Career Dynamics: Matching Individual and Organizational Needs. Addison-Wesley.
[107]
Theresa Schnettler, Julia Bobe, Anne Scheunemann, Stefan Fries, and Carola Grunschel. 2020. Is it still worth it? Applying expectancy-value theory to investigate the intraindividual motivational process of forming intentions to drop out from university. Motivation and Emotion 44, 4 (2020), 491–507. DOI:
[108]
Michael James Scott and Gheorghita Ghinea. 2014. Measuring enrichment: The assembly and validation of an instrument to assess student self-beliefs in CS1. In Proceedings of the 10th Annual Conference on International Computing Education Research. 123–130.
[109]
Catherine Sebastian, Stephanie Burnett, and Sarah-Jayne Blakemore. 2008. Development of the self-concept during adolescence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12, 11 (2008), 441–446. DOI:
[110]
Anna Sfard and Anna Prusak. 2005. Telling identities: In search of an analytic tool for investigating learning as a culturally shaped activity. Educational Researcher 34, 4 (2005), 14–22. DOI:
[111]
Jane Sinclair and Sara Kalvala. 2015. Exploring societal factors affecting the experience and engagement of first year female computer science undergraduates. In Proceedings of the 15th Koli Calling Conference on Computing Education Research. 107–116.
[112]
Courtney S. Smith-Orr and Andrew Garnett. 2016. Motivation and identity in C++ the effects of music in an engineering classroom. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. IEEE, 1–5.
[113]
Margaret Beale Spencer, Davido Dupree, and Tracey Hartmann. 1997. A phenomenological variant of ecological systems theory (PVEST): A self-organization perspective in context. Development and Psychopathology 9, 4 (1997), 817–833.
[114]
Bernd Carsten Stahl, Job Timmermans, and Brent Daniel Mittelstadt. 2016. The ethics of computing: A survey of the computing-oriented literature. Computing Surveys 48, 4(2016), 55:1–55:38. DOI:
[115]
Reed Stevens, Kevin O’Connor, Lari Garrison, Andrew Jocuns, and Daniel M. Amos. 2008. Becoming an engineer: Toward a three dimensional view of engineering learning. Journal of Engineering Education 97, 3 (2008), 355–368. DOI:.
[116]
Sheldon Stryker and Peter J. Burke. 2000. The past, present, and future of an identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly 63, 4 (2000), 284–297.
[117]
Mohsen Taheri, Monique Ross, Zahra Hazari, Mark Weiss, Michael Georgiopoulos, Ken Christensen, Tiana Solis, Atalie Garcia, and Deepa Chari. 2018. A structural equation model analysis of computing identity sub-constructs and student academic persistence. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. IEEE, 1–7.
[118]
Erika D. Tate and Marcia C. Linn. 2005. How does identity shape the experiences of women of color engineering students? Journal of Science Education and Technology 14, 5–6 (2005), 483–493.
[119]
Ella Taylor-Smith, Sally Smith, and Colin Smith. 2019. Identity and belonging for graduate apprenticeships in computing: The experience of first cohort degree apprentices in scotland. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education. 2–8.
[120]
Farah Tokmic, Syeda Fatema Mazumder, Audrey Rorrer, Tonya Frevert, Mary Lou Maher, and Celine Latulipe. 2019. Salient measures of an engaged computing education community. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. IEEE, 1–5.
[121]
Karen L. Tonso. 2006. Student engineers and engineer identity: Campus engineer identities as figured world. Cultural Studies of Science Education 1, 2 (2006), 273–307.
[122]
Stuart A. Tross, Jeffrey P. Harper, Lewis W. Osher, and Linda M. Kneidinger. 2000. Not just the usual cast of characteristics: Using personality to predict college performance and retention. Journal of College Student Development 41, 3 (2000), 323–34.
[123]
Lars Ulriksen, Lene Møller Madsen, and Henriette T. Holmegaard. 2010. What do we know about explanations for drop out/opt out among young people from STM higher education programmes? Studies in Science Education 46, 2 (2010), 209–244.
[124]
Moshe Y. Vardi. 2018. Are we having an ethical crisis in computing? Communications of the ACM 62, 1(2018), 7. DOI:
[125]
Monique Verhoeven, Astrid M. G. Poorthuis, and Monique Volman. 2019. The role of school in adolescents’ identity development. A literature review. Educational Psychology Review 31, 1 (2019), 35–63. DOI:
[126]
Mikko Vesisenaho, Helena Puhakka, Jussi Silvonen, Erkki Sutinen, Marjatta Vanhalakka-Ruoho, Pirkko Voutilainen, and Leena Penttinen. 2009. Need for study and career counselling in computer science. In Proceedings of the 2009 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. IEEE, 1–6.
[127]
Alicia N. Washington, Shaefny Grays, and Sudhipta Dasmohapatra. 2016. The computer science attitude and identity survey (CSAIS): A novel tool for measuring the impact of ethnic identity in underrepresented computer science students. In Proceedings of the ASEE’s 123rd Annual Conference & Exposition 2016.
[128]
Etienne Wenger. 1999. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press.
[129]
Robin Whittemore, Susan K. Chase, and Carol Lynn Mandle. 2001. Validity in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research 11, 4 (2001), 522–537.
[130]
Jesse L. M. Wilkins. 2004. Mathematics and science self-concept: An international investigation. The Journal of Experimental Education 72, 4(2004), 331–346. DOI:
[131]
Claes Wohlin. 2014. Guidelines for snowballing in systematic literature studies and a replication in software engineering. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering.Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, 10 pages. DOI:

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Evaluating Exploratory Reading Groups for Supporting Undergraduate Research Pipelines in ComputingProceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 110.1145/3632620.3671104(389-405)Online publication date: 12-Aug-2024

Index Terms

  1. Identity in Higher Computer Education Research: A Systematic Literature Review

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Transactions on Computing Education
    ACM Transactions on Computing Education  Volume 23, Issue 3
    September 2023
    233 pages
    EISSN:1946-6226
    DOI:10.1145/3605196
    • Editor:
    • Amy J. Ko
    Issue’s Table of Contents

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 12 September 2023
    Online AM: 30 June 2023
    Accepted: 02 June 2023
    Revised: 24 September 2022
    Received: 31 July 2021
    Published in TOCE Volume 23, Issue 3

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Computer science education
    2. identity
    3. theory
    4. systematic literature review

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)538
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)80
    Reflects downloads up to 03 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Evaluating Exploratory Reading Groups for Supporting Undergraduate Research Pipelines in ComputingProceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 110.1145/3632620.3671104(389-405)Online publication date: 12-Aug-2024

    View Options

    Login options

    Full Access

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Full Text

    View this article in Full Text.

    Full Text

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media