skip to main content
10.1145/3583740.3626815acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessecConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

Empowering Trustworthy Client Selection in Edge Federated Learning Leveraging Reinforcement Learning

Published: 07 August 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Federated learning (FL) is a promising approach for training AI models across multiple clients in Edge Computing (EC), without sharing raw local data. By enabling local training and aggregating updates into a global model, FL maintains privacy while facilitating collaborative learning. Nevertheless, FL encounters several challenges, including trustworthy client participation, inefficient model aggregation due to client with malicious or less accurate model. In this paper, we propose a trustworthy FL method incorporating Q-learning, trust, and reputation mechanisms, enhancing model accuracy and fairness. This method promotes client participation, mitigates malicious attacks' impact, and ensures fair model distribution. Inspired by reinforcement learning, the Q-learning algorithm optimizes client selection using the Bellman equation, enabling the server to balance exploration and exploitation for improved system performance. Furthermore, we explored the advantages of peer-to-peer FL settings. Extensive experimentation demonstrates our proposed trustworthy FL approach's effectiveness in achieving high learning accuracy while ensuring fairness across clients and maintaining efficient client selection. Our results reveal significant improvements in model performance, convergence speed, and generalization.

References

[1]
Li, Q., Wen, Z., Wu, Z., Hu, S., Wang, N., Li, Y., Liu, X. and He, B., 2021. A survey on federated learning systems: vision, hype and reality for data privacy and protection. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.
[2]
Li, T., Sahu, A.K., Talwalkar, A. and Smith, V., 2020. Federated learning: Challenges, methods, and future directions. IEEE signal processing magazine, 37(3), pp.50--60.
[3]
Huang, T., Lin, W., Wu, W., He, L., Li, K. and Zomaya, A.Y., 2020. An efficiency-boosting client selection scheme for federated learning with fairness guarantee. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 32(7), pp.1552--1564.
[4]
Lo, S.K., Liu, Y., Lu, Q., Wang, C., Xu, X., Paik, H.Y. and Zhu, L., 2022. Towards trustworthy ai: Blockchain-based architecture design for accountability and fairness of federated learning systems. IEEE Internet of Things Journal.
[5]
Serhani, M.A., Abreha, H.G., Tariq, A., Hayajneh, M., Xu, Y. and Hayawi, K., 2023. Dynamic Data Sample Selection and Scheduling in Edge Federated Learning. IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society.
[6]
Tan, F., Yan, P. and Guan, X., 2017. Deep reinforcement learning: from Q-learning to deep Q-learning. In Neural Information Processing: 24th International Conference, ICONIP(pp. 475--483).
[7]
Imteaj, A. and Amini, M.H., 2020, December. Fedar: Activity and resource-aware federated learning model for distributed mobile robots. In 2020 19th IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA) (pp. 1153--1160). IEEE.
[8]
Zhang, J., Wu, Y. and Pan, R., 2021, April. Incentive mechanism for horizontal federated learning based on reputation and reverse auction. In Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021 (pp. 947--956).
[9]
Tan, X., Ng, W.C., Lim, W.Y.B., Xiong, Z., Niyato, D. and Yu, H., 2022. Reputation-Aware Federated Learning Client Selection based on Stochastic Integer Programming. IEEE Transactions on Big Data.
[10]
Rjoub, G., Wahab, O.A., Bentahar, J. and Bataineh, A., 2022. Trust-driven reinforcement selection strategy for federated learning on IoT devices. Computing, pp.1--23.
[11]
Rjoub, G., Wahab, O.A., Bentahar, J., Cohen, R. and Bataineh, A.S., 2022. Trust-augmented deep reinforcement learning for federated learning client selection. Information Systems Frontiers, pp.1--18. 14(7), p.1407.
[12]
Huang, T., Lin, W., Wu, W., He, L., Li, K. and Zomaya, A.Y., 2020. An efficiency-boosting client selection scheme for federated learning with fairness guarantee. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 32(7), pp.1552--1564.
[13]
Gao, S., Chen, X., Zhu, J., Dong, X. and Ma, J., 2021. Trustworker: A trustworthy and privacy-preserving worker selection scheme for blockchain-based crowdsensing. IEEE Trans on Services Computing.
[14]
Kim, J. and Yang, I., 2020, July. Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equations for q-learning in continuous time. In Learning for Dynamics and Control (pp. 739--748). PMLR.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Empowering Trustworthy Client Selection in Edge Federated Learning Leveraging Reinforcement Learning

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    SEC '23: Proceedings of the Eighth ACM/IEEE Symposium on Edge Computing
    December 2023
    405 pages
    ISBN:9798400701238
    DOI:10.1145/3583740
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 07 August 2024

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. federated learning
    2. reinforcement learning
    3. trust
    4. reputation
    5. privacy
    6. edge computing

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    • UAEU Zayed health science center

    Conference

    SEC '23
    Sponsor:
    SEC '23: Eighth ACM/IEEE Symposium on Edge Computing
    December 6 - 9, 2023
    DE, Wilmington, USA

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 40 of 100 submissions, 40%

    Upcoming Conference

    SEC '24
    The Nineth ACM/IEEE Symposium on Edge Computing
    December 4 - 7, 2024
    Rome , Italy

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 30
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)30
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)30
    Reflects downloads up to 14 Sep 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Get Access

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media