skip to main content
article
Free access

Power, politics, and MIS implementation

Published: 01 June 1983 Publication History

Abstract

Theories of resistance to management information systems (MIS) are important because they guide the implementation strategies and tactics chosen by implementors. Three basic theories of the causes of resistance underlie many prescriptions and rules for MIS implementation. Simply stated, people resist MIS because of their own internal factors, because of poor system design, and because of the interaction of specific system design features with aspects of the organizational context of system use. These theories differ in their basic assumptions about systems, organizations, and resistance; they also differ in predictions that can be derived from them and in their implications for the implementation process. These differences are described and the task of evaluating the theories on the bases of the differences is begun. Data from a case study are used to illustrate the theories and to demonstrate the superiority, for implementors, of the interaction theory.

References

[1]
Alter, S.L A study of computer aided decision-making in organizations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass., 1975,
[2]
Bariff, M.L., and Galbraith, J.R. Intraorganizational power considerations for designing information systems. Accounting Organizations and Society 3 (1978), 15-27.
[3]
Braverman, H. Labor and Monopoly Capital. Monthly Review Press, New York, 1974.
[4]
Crozier, M. The Bureauchratic Phenomenon. Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago, 1964.
[5]
Dalton. M. Men Who Manage. Wiley, New York, 1959.
[6]
Ginzberg, M.J. A detailed look at implementation research. Rept. CISR-4, Center for Information Systems Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 1974.
[7]
Ginzberg, M.J. Implementation as a process of change: A framework and empirical study. Rept. CISR-13, Center for Information Systems Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 1975.
[8]
Hedberg, B., Edstrom, A., Muller, W., and Wilpert, S.B. The impact of computer technology on organizational power structures. In E. Grechla and N. Szyperski (FAJS.), Information Systems and Organization Structure, Ne w York, 1975, pp. 131-148.
[9]
Keen, P.G.W. Information systems and organizational change. Rept. CISR- 46, Center for Information Systems Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 1980.
[10]
Kling, R. Automated information systems as social resources in policy making. Proceedings of the Association for Computing Machinery, 1978, pp. 666-674.
[11]
Kling, R. Automated welfare client tracking and service integration: The political economy of computing. Comm. ACM 0une 1978), 484-493.
[12]
Kling, R. Defining the boundaries of computing in complex organizations: A Behavioral approach. Working Paper, Univ. California, Irvine, 1982.
[13]
Kling, R. Social analyses of computing: Theoretical perspectives in recant empirical research. Comput. Surv. 12, 1 (1980), 61-110.
[14]
Laudon, K.C. Computers and Bureaucratic Reform. Wiley, New York, 1974.
[15]
Lawler, E. and Rhode, J.G. Information and Control in Organizations. Goodyear, Palisades, Calif., 1976.
[16]
Lucas, H. Why Information Systems Fag. Columbia Univ. Press, New York, 1975.
[17]
Markus, M.L. Implementation politics--Top management support and user involvement. Systems, Objectives, Solutions (1981), 203-215.
[18]
Markus, M.L. Understanding information systems use in organizations: A theoretical explanation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Case Western Reserve Univ., Cleveland, Ohio, 1979.
[19]
Markus, M.L. and Pfeffer, J. Power and the design and implementation of accounting and control systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society. In press,
[20]
Mechanic, D. Sources of power of lower participants in complex organization. Administrative soi. Quart. (Dec. 1982). 349-364.
[21]
Mintzberg, H., Raisinghani, D., and Theomt, A. The structure of "unstructured" decision processes. Administrative SOL Quart. 21,246-275.
[22]
Noble, D.F. Social choice in machine design: The case of automatically controlled machine tools, and a challenge for labor. Monthly Bey. (1979).
[23]
Pettigrew, A.M. Information control as a power resource. Sociology (May 1972), 187-204.
[24]
Pfeffer, J. Organizationa Design. AHM Publ. Corp., Arlington Heights, m., 1978.
[25]
Pfeffer, J. Power in Organization. Pitman Publ. Co., Marshfield, Mass., 1981.
[26]
Robey, D., and Taggart, W. Measuring managers' minds: The assessment of style in human information processing. Acod. Manag. Bey. 6 (3), 1981.
[27]
Strauss, G. Tactics of lateral relationship: The purchasing agent. In Kolb et el. (Eds.), Organizational Psychology A Book of Readings, 2nd ed., Prentice- Hall, Engleweod Cliffs. N.J. 1974.

Cited By

View all
  • (2025)What do we need to know about the Chief Information Security Officer? A literature review and research agendaComputers & Security10.1016/j.cose.2024.104063148(104063)Online publication date: Jan-2025
  • (2024)When Big Brother Is Benevolent: How Technology Developers Navigate Power Dynamics among Users to Elevate Worker InterestsAcademy of Management Discoveries10.5465/amd.2022.011110:3(438-462)Online publication date: Sep-2024
  • (2024)Interferência dos periódicos da área de gestão na determinação das publicações historicamente mais influentes da Ciência da Informação e BiblioteconomiaInterference of the management area journals in determining the historically most influential publications in Information Science and Library ScienceInterferencia de las revistas del área de gestión en la determinación de las publicaciones históricamente más influyentes en Ciencias de la Información y BiblioteconomíaInformação & Informação10.5433/1981-8920.2023v28n4p45328:4(453-487)Online publication date: 28-Sep-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Power, politics, and MIS implementation

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image Communications of the ACM
    Communications of the ACM  Volume 26, Issue 6
    June 1983
    54 pages
    ISSN:0001-0782
    EISSN:1557-7317
    DOI:10.1145/358141
    Issue’s Table of Contents
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 01 June 1983
    Published in CACM Volume 26, Issue 6

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. implementation
    2. intraorganizational power
    3. politics
    4. resistance

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)1,355
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)198
    Reflects downloads up to 31 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Login options

    Full Access

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media