How students choose names: A replication study
Authors: 
Qing Mi, Xiaoke Wang, Bingnuo ChenAuthors Info & Claims
Qing Mi, Xiaoke Wang, Bingnuo ChenAuthors Info & ClaimsASE '22: Proceedings of the 37th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering
Article No.: 206, Pages 1 - 5
Abstract
Names of classes/methods/variables play an important role in code readability. To investigate how developers choose names, Feitelson et al. conducted an empirical survey and suggested a method to improve naming quality. We replicated their study, but limited the survey subjects to university students. Specifically, we conducted two experiments including 341 students from freshmen to seniors. The aim of the first experiment was to investigate the characteristics of the names given by students. The experimental results showed that the name length as well as the number of words contained in names increased with the grade and students have ambiguity in understanding variable names. The second experiment was to verify whether Feitelson et al.’s naming method can help improve the quality of the names given by students. The experimental results showed an improvement in naming quality for more than 67% of cases, which confirms the validity of the method for university students.
References
[1]
Eran Avidan and Dror G. Feitelson. 2017. Effects of Variable Names on Comprehension: An Empirical Study. In 2017 IEEE/ACM 25th International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC). 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPC.2017.27
[2]
Raymond PL Buse and Westley R Weimer. 2009. Learning a metric for code readability. IEEE Transactions on software engineering 36, 4 (2009), 546–558.
[3]
Roee Cates, Nadav Yunik, and Dror G. Feitelson. 2021. Does Code Structure Affect Comprehension? On Using and Naming Intermediate Variables. In 2021 IEEE/ACM 29th International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC). 118–126. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPC52881.2021.00020
[4]
Marcus Ciolkowski, Oliver Laitenberger, and Stefan Biffl. 2003. Software reviews, the state of the practice. IEEE software 20, 6 (2003), 46–51.
[5]
Carlos Eduardo C Dantas and Marcelo A Maia. 2021. Readability and Understandability of Snippets Recommended by General-purpose Web Search Engines: a Comparative Study. In 2021 36th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering Workshops (ASEW). IEEE, 126–130.
[6]
Sarah Fakhoury, Devjeet Roy, Yuzhan Ma, Venera Arnaoudova, and Olusola Adesope. 2020. Measuring the impact of lexical and structural inconsistencies on developers’ cognitive load during bug localization. Empirical Software Engineering 25, 3 (2020), 2140–2178.
[7]
Davide Falessi, Natalia Juristo, Claes Wohlin, Burak Turhan, Jürgen Münch, Andreas Jedlitschka, and Markku Oivo. 2018. Empirical software engineering experts on the use of students and professionals in experiments. Empirical Software Engineering 23, 1 (2018), 452–489.
[8]
Dror G. Feitelson, Ayelet Mizrahi, Nofar Noy, Aviad Ben Shabat, Or Eliyahu, and Roy Sheffer. 2022. How Developers Choose Names. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 48, 1 (2022), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2020.2976920
[9]
George W. Furnas, Thomas K. Landauer, Louis M. Gomez, and Susan T. Dumais. 1987. The vocabulary problem in human-system communication. Commun. ACM 30, 11 (1987), 964–971.
[10]
Edward M Gellenbeck and Curtis R Cook. 1991. An investigation of procedure and variable names as beacons during program comprehension. In Empirical studies of programmers: Fourth workshop. Ablex Publishing, Norwood, NJ, 65–81.
[11]
Emily Hill, David Binkley, Dawn Lawrie, Lori Pollock, and K Vijay-Shanker. 2014. An empirical study of identifier splitting techniques. Empirical Software Engineering 19, 6 (2014), 1754–1780.
[12]
Walid Maalej, Rebecca Tiarks, Tobias Roehm, and Rainer Koschke. 2014. On the comprehension of program comprehension. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM) 23, 4(2014), 1–37.
[13]
Steve McConnell. [n. d.]. Code Complete 2nd Edition V413hav. ([n. d.]).
[14]
Zoltán Porkoláb and Tibor Brunner. 2018. The codecompass comprehension framework. In Proceedings of the 26th Conference on Program Comprehension. 393–396.
[15]
Juergen Rilling and Tuomas Klemola. 2003. Identifying comprehension bottlenecks using program slicing and cognitive complexity metrics. In 11th IEEE International Workshop on Program Comprehension, 2003. IEEE, 115–124.
[16]
Janet Siegmund. 2016. Program Comprehension: Past, Present, and Future. In 2016 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution, and Reengineering (SANER), Vol. 5. 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1109/SANER.2016.35
[17]
Janet Siegmund, Norman Peitek, Chris Parnin, Sven Apel, Johannes Hofmeister, Christian Kästner, Andrew Begel, Anja Bethmann, and André Brechmann. 2017. Measuring neural efficiency of program comprehension. In Proceedings of the 2017 11th Joint Meeting on Foundations of Software Engineering. 140–150.
[18]
P Sivaprakasam and V Sangeetha. 2012. An accurate model of software code readability. International Journal of Engineering 1, 6 (2012).
[19]
Alaaeddin Swidan, Alexander Serebrenik, and Felienne Hermans. 2017. How do Scratch programmers name variables and procedures?. In 2017 IEEE 17th International Working Conference on Source Code Analysis and Manipulation (SCAM). IEEE, 51–60.
[20]
Yi Wang, Keqiang He, Huichen Dai, Wei Meng, Junchen Jiang, Bin Liu, and Yan Chen. 2012. Scalable name lookup in NDN using effective name component encoding. In 2012 IEEE 32nd International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems. IEEE, 688–697.
Index Terms
- How students choose names: A replication study
Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.
Recommendations
Effects of variable names on comprehension an empirical study
ICPC '17: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Program ComprehensionIt is widely accepted that meaningful variable names are important for comprehension. We conducted a controlled experiment in which 9 professional developers try to understand 6 methods from production util classes, either with the original variable ...
A Survey of the Forms of Java Reference Names
ICPC '15: Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Program ComprehensionThe readability of identifiers is a major factor of program comprehension and an aim of naming convention guidelines. Due to their semantic content, identifiers are also used in feature and bug location, among other software maintenance tasks. Looking ...
Shorter identifier names take longer to comprehend
Developers spend the majority of their time reading code, a process in which identifier names play a key role. Although many identifier naming styles exist, they often lack an empirical basis and it is not clear whether short or long identifier names ...
Comments
Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
October 2022
2006 pages
ISBN:9781450394758
DOI:10.1145/3551349
Copyright © 2022 ACM.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 05 January 2023
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Research-article
- Research
- Refereed limited
Funding Sources
- GHfund B
- Spark Project of Beijing University
Conference
ASE '22
ASE '22: 37th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering
October 10 - 14, 2022
MI, Rochester, USA
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 82 of 337 submissions, 24%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 72Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)24
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 25 Dec 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format