short-paper

Qualitative and Mixed Methods Researches in Social Sciences

Authors:

Ana María Pinto-Llorente,

M. Cruz Sánchez-Gómez,

António Pedro CostaAuthors Info & Claims

TEEM'20: Eighth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality

Pages 193 - 196

https://doi.org/10.1145/3434780.3436696

Published: 22 January 2021 Publication History

Abstract

This is the third edition of the track Implementation of Qualitative and Mixed Methods Researches in the International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM). The main objective of the track is to specify the general epistemological formulations in which qualitative methods are based in more precise and current methodological proposals, since we are in an exciting moment in the qualitative research in which it is appreciated a clear tendency in the use of a mixed methods research. A space that intent to contribute to the number of national and international conferences and seminars that have been held along these years devoted to the discussion of mixed methods research. In this edition, national and international researchers have participated with relevant qualitative and mixed methods researches that contribute with interesting advances in this field.

References

[1]

M. T. Anguera. 2008. Metodologías cualitativas: características, procesos y aplicaciones. In Metodología en la investigación sobre discapacidad. Introducción al uso de las ecuaciones estructurales, M. A. Verdugo, Coords. Publicaciones INICO, Salamanca, 141-155.

[2]

P. Bazeley. 2018. Integrating Analyses in Mixed Methods Research. SAGE. Los Angeles, CA.

[3]

E. Bericat. 1998. La integración de los métodos cuantitativo y cualitativo en la investigación social. Ariel. Barcelona.

[4]

Bryman. 2004. Social Research Methods. University Press. Oxford.

[5]

Bryman. S. Becker and J. Sempik. 2008. Quality criteria for quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods research: A view from social policy. International Journal Social Research Methodology, 11, 4, 261-276.

[6]

K. S. Cameron and R. E. Quinn. 2011. Diagnosing and changing organizational Culture: Based on the competing values framework. Jossey Bass. Reading, MA.

[7]

H. A. Carpio Ramos P. A. Carpio Ramos, J. E. Tarrillo Carrasco, F. J. García-Peñalvo, and M. A. Morante Dávila. 2020. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM 2020) (Salamanca, Spain, October 21-23, 2020), F. J. García-Peñalvo Ed. ACM, New York, NY, USA.

[8]

Y. A. Castro Ortegón P. M. Acosta Castellanos, S. A. Guisa and M. A. Pardo García. 2020. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM 2020) (Salamanca, Spain, October 21-23, 2020), F. J. García-Peñalvo Ed. ACM, New York, NY, USA.

[9]

K. Charmaz. 2013. Constructing grounded theory. SAGE. Thousand Oaks, CA.

[10]

F. Conde. 1995. Las perspectivas metodológicas cualitativa y cuantitativa en el context de la historia de las ciencias. In Métodos y técnicas cualitativas de investigación en ciencias sociales, J. M. Delgado and J. Gutiérrez Fernández, Coords. Síntesis. Madrid, 53-68.

[11]

E. G. Creamer. 2017. An Introduction to Fully Integrated Mixed Methods Research. SAGE. Los Angeles, CA.

[12]

J. W. Creswell and V. L. Plano-Clark. 2006. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. SAGE. Thousand Oaks, CA.

[13]

J. W. Creswell and V. L. Plano Clark. 2018. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. SAGE. Los Angeles, CA.

[14]

Delgado. 2014. Viajando a Ítaca por los mares cuantitativos, manual de ruta para investigar en grado y en postgrado. Amarú, Salamanca.

[15]

U. Flick. 2004. Introducción a la Investigación Cualitativa. Morata Madrid.

[16]

U. Flick. 2014. La gestión de la calidad en la investigación cualitativa. Morata. Madrid.

[17]

F. J. García-Peñalvo and A. Corell. 2020. La COVID-19: ¿enzima de la transformación digital de la docencia o reflejo de una crisis metodológica y competencial en la educación superior? Campus Virtuales 9, 2, 83-98.

[18]

F. J. García-Peñalvo, A. Corell, V. Abella-García, and M. Grande-De-Prado. 2020. Online Assessment in Higher Education in the Time of COVID-19. Education in the Knowledge Society 21.

[19]

J. C. Greene. 2008. Is Mixed Methods Social Inquiry a Distinctive Methodology? Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2, 1, 7-22.

[20]

R. Hernández, C. Fernández and M. P. Baptista. 2014. Metodología de la investigación. McGraw Hill, México.

[21]

R. Hernández Sampieri and C. P. Mendoza Torre. 2008. El matrimonio cuantitativo cualitativo: el paradigma mixto. In Proceedings of the 6º Congreso de Investigación en Sexología (Instituto Mexicano de Sexología, A. C. y Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco, Villahermosa, Tabasco, México, 2008), J. L. Álvarez Gayou Ed.

[22]

Johnson and L. Christensen. 2008. Educational Research. Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Approaches. Sage. Thousand Oaks, California.

[23]

B. Johnson and A. Onwuegbuzie. 2004. Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33, 7, 14-26.

[24]

B. Johnson, A. Onwuegbuzie and L. Turner. 2007. Toward a definition of Mixed Methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 2, 112-133.

[25]

N. Leech and A. Onwuegbuzie A. 2009. A typology of mixed methods research designs', Quality and Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, 43, 265-275.

[26]

L. Morgan. 2007. Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: methodological implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1, 1, 48-76.

[27]

J. M. Morse. 2012. Qualitative health research: Creating a new discipline. Left Coast Press. Walnut Creek, CA.

[28]

J. M. Morse and L. Niehaus. 2010. Mixed method design: Principles and procedures. Left Coast Press. Walnut Creek, CA.

[29]

H. L. O'Brien and M. Lebow. 2013. Mixed‐methods approach to measuring user experience in online news interactions. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64, 8, 1543-1556.

[30]

J. Onwuegbuzie and N. L. Leech, 2005. On becoming a pragmatic researcher: the importance of combining quantitative and qualitative methodologies. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 8, 5, 375-387.

[31]

M. C. Sánchez-Gómez. 2015. La dicotomía cualitativo-cuantitativo: posibilidades de integración y diseños mixtos. Campo Abierto. Revista De Educación, 1, 1, 11-30

[32]

Tashakkori and C. Teddlie. 2003. The past and future of mixed methods research: From data triangulation to mixed model designs. In Handbook on mixed methods in the behavioral and social sciences, A. Tashakkori and C. Teddlie, Eds. SAGE. Thousand Oaks, CA, 671-702.

[33]

Tashakkori and C. Teddlie. 2008. Introduction to mixed method and mixed model studies in the social and behavioral sciences. In The mixed methods reader, J. W. Creswell and V. L. Plano-Clark, Eds. SAGE. Thousand Oaks, CA, 7-26.

[34]

Tashakkori and C. Teddlie. 2008. Quality of inferences in mixed methods research: Calling for an integrative framework. In Advances in mixed methods research,M. M. Bergman Ed. SAGE. Thousand Oaks, CA, 1-7.

[35]

Tashakkori and C. Teddlie. 2010. Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research. Sage Publications, Inc. Thousand Oaks, California.

[36]

S. Verdugo-Castro A. García-Holgado and M. C. Sánchez-Gómez. 2020. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM 2020) (Salamanca, Spain, October 21-23, 2020), F. J. García-Peñalvo Ed. ACM, New York, NY, USA.

Digital Library

[37]

J. A. Yañez-Figueroa M. S. Ramírez-Montoya and F.-J. García-Peñalvo. 2020. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM 2020) (Salamanca, Spain, October 21-23, 2020), F. J. García-Peñalvo Ed. ACM, New York, NY, USA.

[38]

Y. Zhao M. C. Sánchez Gómez and A. M. Pinto-Llorente. 2020. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM 2020) (Salamanca, Spain, October 21-23, 2020), F. J. García-Peñalvo Ed. ACM, New York, NY, USA.

Cited By

Hauptman ASchelble BMcNeese NMadathil K(2023)Adapt and overcomeComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2022.107451138:COnline publication date: 1-Jan-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107451
Guerra CCosta N(2021)Can Pedagogical Innovations Be Sustainable? One Evaluation Outlook for Research Developed in Portuguese Higher EducationEducation Sciences10.3390/educsci1111072511:11(725)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2021
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11110725

Recommendations

Mixing quantitative with qualitative methods: current practices in designing experiments, gathering data and analysis with mixed methods reporting
OzCHI '17: Proceedings of the 29th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction

In this workshop, we set up a discussion on opposing approaches to evaluation methods in order to elicit best practice scenarios. We ask what are the best practice methods being used in the OzCHI community to address the complexities inherent in ...
Mixed Methods Research: From complementarity to integration
TEEM'21: Ninth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM'21)

This is the fourth edition of the track Implementation of Qualitative and Mixed Methods Researches in the International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM). Its main objective is to provide a space to researchers ...
Reflections on Qualitative and Mixed Methods Researches
TEEM'19: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality

This is the second edition of the track Implementation of Qualitative and Mixed Methods Researches in the International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM). The aims of the track are to present the most relevant ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences

TEEM'20: Eighth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality

October 2020

1084 pages

ISBN:9781450388504

DOI:10.1145/3434780

Editors:
Francisco José García-Peñalvo
University of Salamanca
,
Alicia García-Holgado
University of Salamanca

Copyright © 2020 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 22 January 2021

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Short-paper
Research
Refereed limited

Conference

TEEM'20

TEEM'20: Eighth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality

October 21 - 23, 2020

Salamanca, Spain

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 496 of 705 submissions, 70%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

2
Total Citations
View Citations
144
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)21
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3

Reflects downloads up to 03 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Hauptman ASchelble BMcNeese NMadathil K(2023)Adapt and overcomeComputers in Human Behavior10.1016/j.chb.2022.107451138:COnline publication date: 1-Jan-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107451
Guerra CCosta N(2021)Can Pedagogical Innovations Be Sustainable? One Evaluation Outlook for Research Developed in Portuguese Higher EducationEducation Sciences10.3390/educsci1111072511:11(725)Online publication date: 11-Nov-2021
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11110725

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents