research-article

A Scaffolding Design for Pedagogical Agents within the Higher-Education Context

Authors:

Ati Suci Dian Martha,

Harry Budi Santoso,

Heru SuhartantoAuthors Info & Claims

ICETC '19: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Education Technology and Computers

Pages 139 - 143

https://doi.org/10.1145/3369255.3369267

Published: 21 January 2020 Publication History

Abstract

The use of scaffolding in the design of pedagogical agents has been carried out by many researchers and has a significant impact on online learning. However, how scaffolding by pedagogical agents is applied to individual and group settings is not clearly understood. The scaffolding design in this study consists of an integration of metacognitive scaffolding and motivation scaffolding. The integration of scaffolding will be utilized by a pedagogical agent to facilitate blended learning in a higher education context and we will evaluate the effectiveness of our pedagogical agent model using a quasi-experiment. In this research, we design scaffolding for pedagogical agents within the higher-education context.

References

[1]

Martha, A. S. D., and Santoso, H. B. 2019. The design and impact of the pedagogical agent: A systematic literature review. Journal of Educators Online, 16 (1), (January 2019).

[2]

Schroeder, N. L., Adesope, O. O., and Gilbert, R. B. 2013. How effective are pedagogical agents for learning? A meta-analytic review. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 49 (1), (July 2013), 1--39.

[3]

Olney, A. M., and Cade, W. L. 2013. Matching learner models to instructional strategies. Design Recommendations for Intelligent Tutoring Systems - Volume 1: Learner Modeling, 1. R. Sottilare, A. Graesser, X. Hu, and H. Holden, Ed. Orlando, Florida: U.S. Army Research Laboratory, 2013, 23--38.

[4]

Goldspink, G., Winter, P. and Foster, M. 2008. Student engagement and quality pedagogy. European Conference of Educational Research. Goteborg, 10-12 September, 2008.

[5]

Efklides, A. 2011. Interaction of metacognition with motivation and affect in self-regulated learning: The MASRL model. Educational Psychologist, 46, 1 (January 2011), 6--25.

[6]

Hartnett, M. 2016. Motivation in Online Education. Springer.

[7]

Martha, A. S. D., and Santoso, H. B. 2018. Investigation of motivation theory on pedagogical agents design in the online learning environment. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Education Technology and Computers, 26-28 October 2018, Tokyo, Japan. ICETC 2018. ACM, New York, NY, 217--222. DOI=https://doi.org/10.1145/3290511.3290530.

Digital Library

[8]

Belland, B. R. 2014. Scaffolding: Definition, current debates, and future directions. In: Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, 505--518.

[9]

Wilson, M., and Gerber, L. E. 2008. How generational theory can improve teaching: Strategies for working with the "millenials". Currents in Teaching and Learning, 1, 1 (Fall, 2008), 29--44.

[10]

Flesher, S. 2015. Online learning: 5 ways to engage millennial learners. Elearning Design & Development. [Online]. Available: https://www.skillbuilderlms.com/online-learning-engage-millennial-learners/

[11]

Belland, B. R. 2017. Instructional Scaffolding in STEM Education, Strategies and Efficacy Evidence. Springer.

[12]

An, Y. 2010. Scaffolding wiki-based, ill-structured problem solving in an online environment. Merlot Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6, 4 (December 2010), 723--734.

[13]

Kasiyah. 2017. Metode pembekalan model community of inquire dengan cognitive apprenticeship pada forum diskusi online asinkronus. Doctoral Dissertation. Faculty of Computer Science Universitas Indonesia.

[14]

Shand, K., Farrelly, S. G., and Costa, V. 2016. Principles of course design: A model for blended learning. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (Savanah, Georgia, March 21-26, 2016). SITE 2016. AACE, Chesapeake, VA, 378--389.

[15]

Creswell, J. W. 2014. Research Design - Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches, fourth edition. United States of America: SAGE Publications, Inc.

[16]

Garrison, D. R., & Akyol, Z. 2015. Toward the development of a metacognition construct for communities of inquiry. Internet and Higher Education, 24, 66--71.

[17]

Fisher, D. and Frey, N. 2010. Guided Instruction, How to Develop Confident and Successful Learners. ASCD.

[18]

Şendurur, E. and Yildirim, Z. 2019. Web-based metacognitive scaffolding for internet search. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 47, 3 (March 2019), 433--455. DOI=https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239518803291.

[19]

Mackiewicz, J. and Thompson, I. 2013. Motivational scaffolding, politeness, and writing center tutoring. The Writing Center Journal, 33, 1, 38--73.

Cited By

Tremblay CPoellhuber BKozanitis A(2024)L’usage d’outils d’échafaudage numériques : comment et pourquoiRevue internationale de pédagogie de l’enseignement supérieur10.4000/ripes.552940:1Online publication date: 13-Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.4000/ripes.5529
Herbert CDołżycka J(2024)Teaching online with an artificial pedagogical agent as a teacher and visual avatars for self-other representation of the learners. Effects on the learning performance and the perception and satisfaction of the learners with online learning: previous and new findingsFrontiers in Education10.3389/feduc.2024.14160339Online publication date: 27-Nov-2024
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1416033
Zielke MZakhidov DLo TCraig SRege RPyle HMeer NKuo N(2024)Exploring Social Learning in Collaborative Augmented Reality With Pedagogical Agents as Learning CompanionsInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2024.2323280(1-26)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2323280
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

A Scaffolding Design for Pedagogical Agents within the Higher-Education Context
1. Applied computing
  1. Education
    1. E-learning

Recommendations

Investigation of motivation theory on pedagogical agents design in the online learning environment
ICETC '18: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Education Technology and Computers

An important and crucial factor in the aspects of learning and teaching activities is motivation. In an online learning environment, students are sometimes faced with complex tasks that can reduce learning motivation. In computer learning environment, ...
What is Considered 'Blended Learning' in Higher Education?

This paper attempts to explore and critically compare the various definitions given to blended learning, primarily within the area of Higher Education. It starts with a general description of blended learning and its main characteristics, along with the ...
The impact of a flipped classroom design on learning performance in higher education

The present study examines the differential impact of studying in a Flipped Classroom (FC) setting, as compared to a Blended Learning (BL), a Traditional Learning (TL), and an E-Learning (EL) setting on learning performance, self-efficacy beliefs, ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences

ICETC '19: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Education Technology and Computers

October 2019

326 pages

ISBN:9781450372541

DOI:10.1145/3369255

Copyright © 2019 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

In-Cooperation

University of Twente: University of Twente

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 21 January 2020

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Conference

ICETC 2019

ICETC 2019: 2019 11th International Conference on Education Technology and Computers

October 28 - 31, 2019

Amsterdam, Netherlands

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

9
Total Citations
View Citations
263
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)52
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4

Reflects downloads up to 02 Feb 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Tremblay CPoellhuber BKozanitis A(2024)L’usage d’outils d’échafaudage numériques : comment et pourquoiRevue internationale de pédagogie de l’enseignement supérieur10.4000/ripes.552940:1Online publication date: 13-Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.4000/ripes.5529
Herbert CDołżycka J(2024)Teaching online with an artificial pedagogical agent as a teacher and visual avatars for self-other representation of the learners. Effects on the learning performance and the perception and satisfaction of the learners with online learning: previous and new findingsFrontiers in Education10.3389/feduc.2024.14160339Online publication date: 27-Nov-2024
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1416033
Zielke MZakhidov DLo TCraig SRege RPyle HMeer NKuo N(2024)Exploring Social Learning in Collaborative Augmented Reality With Pedagogical Agents as Learning CompanionsInternational Journal of Human–Computer Interaction10.1080/10447318.2024.2323280(1-26)Online publication date: 11-Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2024.2323280
Martha ASantoso HJunus KSuhartanto H(2023)The Effect of the Integration of Metacognitive and Motivation Scaffolding Through a Pedagogical Agent on Self- and Co-Regulation LearningIEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies10.1109/TLT.2023.326643916:4(573-584)Online publication date: Aug-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2023.3266439
Dever DSonnenfeld NWiedbusch MSchmorrow SAmon MAzevedo R(2023)A complex systems approach to analyzing pedagogical agents’ scaffolding of self-regulated learning within an intelligent tutoring systemMetacognition and Learning10.1007/s11409-023-09346-x18:3(659-691)Online publication date: 19-May-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-023-09346-x
Popova YAbdualiyeva MTorebek YYelshibekov NOmashova G(2022)Improving the effectiveness of senior graders’ education based on the development of mathematical intuition and logic: Kazakhstan’s experienceFrontiers in Education10.3389/feduc.2022.9860937Online publication date: 23-Aug-2022
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.986093
Martha AJunus KSantoso HSuhartanto H(2021)Assessing Undergraduate Students’ e-Learning Competencies: A Case Study of Higher Education Context in IndonesiaEducation Sciences10.3390/educsci1104018911:4(189)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2021
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11040189
Dian Martha ABudi Santoso HJunus KSuhartanto H(2021)Usability Evaluation of The MeMo Tutor: A Scaffolding-Based Pedagogical Agent to Facilitate Learning2021 International Conference on Software Engineering & Computer Systems and 4th International Conference on Computational Science and Information Management (ICSECS-ICOCSIM)10.1109/ICSECS52883.2021.00072(360-364)Online publication date: Aug-2021
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSECS52883.2021.00072
Alhazmi SThevathayan CHamilton M(2020)Interactive Pedagogical Agents for Learning Sequence DiagramsArtificial Intelligence in Education10.1007/978-3-030-52240-7_2(10-14)Online publication date: 6-Jul-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/978-3-030-52240-7_2

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Figures

Tables

Media

View Table of Conten