skip to main content
10.1145/3365609.3365866acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescommConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Putting network verification to good use

Published: 14 November 2019 Publication History

Abstract

The past decade has witnessed remarkable progress in the field of network verification, and interest from academia and industry has spurred the development of increasingly sophisticated verification tools and algorithms. However, outside of a handful of large cloud computing providers, the use of network verification is still sparse. We argue that the next frontier for network verification is to enable easy and effective use by "average" network engineers. Whereas in software development, practitioners frequently use testing frameworks to describe the expected behavior of their systems and to measure the effectiveness of their tests through metrics such as code coverage, no such frameworks exist for the equally challenging task of designing and maintaining networks. To address this gap, we outline the design of a network verification framework. In doing so, we propose 1) a method to compute test coverage for networks, which tells engineers how well their invariants are testing the network; and 2) a new declarative invariant language that makes it easy to express network invariants and enables computation of coverage metrics.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (p77-beckett.mp4)

References

[1]
I. Ahmed, R. Gopinath, C. Brindescu, A. Groce, and C. Jensen. Can testedness be effectively measured? In FSE, 2016.
[2]
M. Anderson. Time warner cable says outages largely resolved. http://www.seattletimes.com/business/time-warner-cable-says-outages-largely-resolved, 2014.
[3]
R. Beckett, A. Gupta, R. Mahajan, and D. Walker. A general approach to network configuration verification. In SIGCOMM, 2017.
[4]
S. K. Fayaz, T. Sharma, A. Fogel, R. Mahajan, T. Millstein, V. Sekar, and G. Varghese. Efficient network reachability analysis using a succinct control plane representation. In OSDI, 2016.
[5]
G. Ferro. Turn network engineers into software engineers. https://etherealmind.com/turn-network-engineers-software-engineers/.
[6]
A. Fogel, S. Fung, L. Pedrosa, M. Walraed-Sullivan, R. Govindan, R. Mahajan, and T. Millstein. A general approach to network configuration analysis. In NSDI, 2015.
[7]
A. Gember-Jacobson, R. Viswanathan, A. Akella, and R. Mahajan. Fast control plane analysis using an abstract representation. In SIGCOMM, 2016.
[8]
J. Godfrey. The summer of network misconfigurations. https://blog.algosec.com/2016/08/business-outages-caused-misconfigurations-headline-news-summer.html, 2016.
[9]
M. Hilton, J. Bell, and D. Marinov. A large-scale study of test coverage evolution. In ASE, 2018.
[10]
P. Kazemian, G. Varghese, and N. McKeown. Header space analysis: Static checking for networks. In NSDI, 2012.
[11]
A. Khurshid, X. Zou, W. Zhou, M. Caesar, and P. B. Godfrey. Veriflow: Verifying network-wide invariants in real time. In NSDI, 2013.
[12]
N. P. Lopes, N. Bjørner, P. Godefroid, K. Jayaraman, and G. Varghese. Checking beliefs in dynamic networks. In NSDI, 2015.
[13]
S. Ragan. Bgp errors are to blame for monday's twitter outage, not ddos attacks. https://www.csoonline.com/article/3138934/security/bgp-errors-are-to-blame-for-monday-s-twitter-outage-not-ddos-attacks.html, 2016.
[14]
S. Sharwood. Google cloud wobbles as workers patch wrong routers. http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/03/01/googlecloudwobblesasworkerspatchwrongrouters/, 2016.
[15]
Y. Sverdlik. Microsoft: misconfigured network device led to azure outage. http://www.datacenterdynamics.com/content-tracks/servers-storage/microsoft-misconfigured-network-device-led-to-azure-outage/68312.fullarticle, 2012.
[16]
Y. Sverdlik. United says it outage resolved, dozen flights canceled monday. https://www.datacenterknowledge.com/archives/2017/01/23/united-says-it-outage-resolved-dozen-flights-canceled-monday, 2017.
[17]
D. Tweney. 5-minute outage costs google $545,000 in revenue. https://venturebeat.com/2013/08/16/3-minute-outage-costs-google-545000-in-revenue/, August 2013.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Putting network verification to good use

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      HotNets '19: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks
      November 2019
      176 pages
      ISBN:9781450370202
      DOI:10.1145/3365609
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 14 November 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. code coverage
      2. network verification
      3. testing

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Conference

      HotNets '19
      Sponsor:
      HotNets '19: The 18th ACM Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks
      November 13 - 15, 2019
      NJ, Princeton, USA

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 110 of 460 submissions, 24%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)13
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
      Reflects downloads up to 14 Sep 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media