skip to main content
10.1145/3362789.3362847acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteemConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Mixed methods and visual representation of data with CAQDAS: empirical study

Published: 16 October 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Mixed Methods increasingly progress and help research to evolve, combining quantitative and qualitative perspectives and helping the researcher to interpret and represent the studied reality with a holistic approach. In order to exemplify the research process from the methodological complementarity, a contextualized study was carried out in the city of Valladolid (Spain) through a mixed approach with the objective of identifying the socio-labour actions implemented by third sector entities that work with people at risk and socially excluded, including women. For this purpose, semi-structured interviews were conducted with workers from the participating entities, and information was also collected in other formats such as roadmaps and reports from the centres. From the categorization, the codification of the speeches and the results of the quantitative scales we proceeded to the triangulation of the data, with the support of digital supports, CAQDAS. Nvivo 12 and webQDA were used. The node map, project map, coding matrices, dendrogram, word trees and word clouds were made. This made it possible to respond to the objective and the research question, concluding that each entity developed different degrees of socio-labour attention based on its degree of available resources. The study was an example of the representation of reality from the convergence of the quantitative perspective and the qualitative perspective.

References

[1]
Bazeley, P. 2010. Computer assisted integration of mixed methods data sources and analyses. Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. SAGE.
[2]
Bazeley, P. 2009. Editorial: Integrating data analyses in mixed method research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 3, 3 (2009), 203--207.
[3]
Bazeley, P. 2006. The contribution of computer software to integrating qualitative and quantitative data and analysis. Research in the Schools. 13, 1 (2006), 63--73.
[4]
Bowleg, L. et al. 2016. The Future of Mixed Methods: A Five Year Projection to 2020.
[5]
Bryman, A. 2006. Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done? Qualitative Research. 6, (2006), 97--113.
[6]
Carmichael, P. 2008. Secondary qualitative analysis using internet resources. The SAGE Handbook of Online Research Methods. Sage.
[7]
Chen, C. et al. 2007. Handbook of data visualization. Springer.
[8]
Cisneros-Puebla, C. and Fielding, N.G. 2009. CAQDAS-GIS convergence: Towards a new integrated mixed method research practice? Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 3, 4 (2009), 349--370.
[9]
Craig, W.J. et al. 2002. Community participation and geographic information systems. Taylor and Francis.
[10]
Creswell, J.M. 2009. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed approaches. SAGE.
[11]
Creswell, J.W. et al. 2011. Best practices for mixed methods research in the health sciences. National Institutes of Health.
[12]
Creswell, J.W. and Plano Clark, V.L. 2007. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage.
[13]
Creswell, J.W. and Plano Clark, V.L. 2011. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. SAGE.
[14]
Denzin, N. 1970. Strategies of multiple triangulation. The research act in sociology: A theoretical introduction to sociological method. 297, (1970), 313.
[15]
Fielding, J. et al. 2013. Opening up open-ended survey data using qualitative software. Quality & Quantity. 47, 6 (2013), 3261--3276.
[16]
Fielding, J.L. and Fielding, N.F. 2013. Integrating information from multiple methods into the analysis of perceived risk of crime: The role of georeferenced field data and mobile methods. Journal of Criminology,. (2013).
[17]
Franzosi, R. et al. 2013. Quantitative narrative analysis software options compared: PC-ACE and CAQDAS (ATLAS.ti, MAXqda, and NVivo). Quality & Quantity. 47, 6 (2013), 3219--3247.
[18]
Grimmer, J. and Stewart, B.M. 2013. Text as data: The promise and pitfalls of automatic content analysis methods for political texts. Political Analysis. 21, 3 (2013), 267--297.
[19]
Hernández- Sampieri, R. et al. 2014. Metodología de la investigación. McGraw-Hill.
[20]
Hesse-Biber, S.N. 2010. Feminist approaches to mixed methods research: Linking theory and practices. SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. SAGE. 169--192.
[21]
Hogenraad, R. et al. 2003. Force and influence in content analysis: The production of new social knowledge. Quality and Quantity. 37, 3 (2003), 221--238.
[22]
Ivankova, N. and Kawamura, Y. 2010. Emerging trends in the utilization of integration designs in the social, behavioural and health sciences. Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioural research. Sage. 581--611.
[23]
Johnson, R.B. et al. 2007. Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 1, 2 (2007), 112--133.
[24]
Jung, J.K. 2009. Computer-aided qualitative GIS: A software-level integration of qualitative research and GIS. Qualitative GIS: a new approach. Sage. 115--135.
[25]
Jung, J.K. and Elwood, S. 2010. Extending the qualitative capabilities of GIS. Transactions in GIS. 14, 1 (2010), 63--87.
[26]
Knigge, L. and Cope, M. 2006. Grounded visualization: Integrating the analysis of qualitative and quantitative data through grounded theory and visualization. Environmental Planning A. 38, (2006), 2021--2037.
[27]
Lee, S. et al. 2010. An empirical comparison of four text mining methods. Journal of Computer Information Systems. 51, 1 (2010), 1--10.
[28]
Llinares-Insa, L.I. et al. 2018. Women's job search competence: A question of motivation, behavior, or gender. Frontiers in Psychology. 9, FEB (2018).
[29]
Maxwell, J. 2010. Using numbers in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry. 16, 6 (2010), 475--482.
[30]
McCandless, D. 2012. Information is beautiful. Collins.
[31]
Mertens, D. 2015. Mixed methods and wicked problems. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 9, 1 (2015), 3--6.
[32]
Mertens, D. 2009. Transformative research and evaluation. Guilford Press.
[33]
Mertens, D. and Wilson, A.T. 2012. Program evaluation theory and practice. Guilford Press.
[34]
Mertens, D.M. et al. 2016. The future of mixed methods: A five year projection to 2020. Mixed methods international research association. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 11, 1 (2016), 11--18.
[35]
Nightingale, A. 2003. A feminist in the forest: Situated knowledges and mixing methods in natural resource management. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographers. 2, 1 (2003), 77--90.
[36]
OECD Employment Outlook 2018 | READ online: 2018. https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/employment/oecd-employment-outlook-2018_empl_outlook-2018-en. Accessed: 2019-01-10.
[37]
Popping, R. 2015. Analyzing open-ended questions by means of text analysis procedures. Bulletin de Methodologie Sociologique. 115, (2015), 79--88.
[38]
Popping, R. and Roberts, C.W. 2009. Coding issues in semantic text analysis. Field Methods. 21, 3 (2009), 244--264.
[39]
Sánchez-Gómez, M.C. et al. 2019. Evaluation of Computer Assisted Qualitative Data Analysis Software (CAQDAS) Applied to Research. Learning Technology for Education Challenges (2019), 474--485.
[40]
Silver, C. and Lewins, A. 2014. Using Software in Qualitative Research: A Step-by-Step Guide. Sage.
[41]
Souza, F.N. et al. 2011. Análise de Dados Qualitativos Suportada pelo Software WebQDA. Atas da VII Conferência Internacional de TIC na Educação: Perspetivas de Inovação (CHALLANGES2011). (2011), 49--56.
[42]
Teddlie, C. and Tashakkori, A. 2009. Foundations of mixed methods research. Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks.
[43]
Tufte, E. 2006. Beautiful evidence. Graphics Press.
[44]
Tufte, E. 2001. Visual Display of Quantitative Information. Graphics Press.
[45]
Unwin, A. et al. 2006. Graphics of Large Datasets: Visualizing a Million. Springer-Verlag.
[46]
Valles, M.S. et al. 2011. Qualitative Archives and Biographical Research Methods. An Introduction to the FQS Special Issue. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 12, 3 (2011).
[47]
Wilkinson, L. 1999. The Grammar of Graphics. Springer-Verlag.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Trends on Computational Thinking, Engineering Education, Technology in Medicine, Qualitative and Mixed Methods, Diversity in STEM, Lab-Based Education, Technology and Education, Gamification and Games for Learning and Smart Learning at TEEM 2022Proceedings TEEM 2022: Tenth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality10.1007/978-981-99-0942-1_1(1-21)Online publication date: 4-May-2023
  • (2023)Strengthening Women’s Footprints Through Digital Tools: Focus Groups in SpainProceedings of TEEM 202310.1007/978-981-97-1814-6_63(642-652)Online publication date: 25-Oct-2023
  • (2021)Multimedia Analysis of Spanish Female Role Models in Science, Technology, Engineering and MathematicsSustainability10.3390/su13221261213:22(12612)Online publication date: 15-Nov-2021
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Mixed methods and visual representation of data with CAQDAS: empirical study

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      TEEM'19: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality
      October 2019
      1085 pages
      ISBN:9781450371919
      DOI:10.1145/3362789
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      In-Cooperation

      • University of Salamanca: University of Salamanca

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 16 October 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. CAQDAS
      2. Mixed methods
      3. methodological complementarity
      4. socio-labour orientation

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Conference

      TEEM'19

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate 496 of 705 submissions, 70%

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)13
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
      Reflects downloads up to 03 Jan 2025

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2023)Trends on Computational Thinking, Engineering Education, Technology in Medicine, Qualitative and Mixed Methods, Diversity in STEM, Lab-Based Education, Technology and Education, Gamification and Games for Learning and Smart Learning at TEEM 2022Proceedings TEEM 2022: Tenth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality10.1007/978-981-99-0942-1_1(1-21)Online publication date: 4-May-2023
      • (2023)Strengthening Women’s Footprints Through Digital Tools: Focus Groups in SpainProceedings of TEEM 202310.1007/978-981-97-1814-6_63(642-652)Online publication date: 25-Oct-2023
      • (2021)Multimedia Analysis of Spanish Female Role Models in Science, Technology, Engineering and MathematicsSustainability10.3390/su13221261213:22(12612)Online publication date: 15-Nov-2021
      • (2021)Accelerating Mixed Methods Research With Natural Language Processing of Big Text DataJournal of Mixed Methods Research10.1177/1558689821102119615:3(398-412)Online publication date: 16-Jun-2021
      • (2019)Reflections on Qualitative and Mixed Methods ResearchesProceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality10.1145/3362789.3362941(508-510)Online publication date: 16-Oct-2019

      View Options

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media