skip to main content
10.1145/3343031.3351021acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Navigation Graph for Tiled Media Streaming

Published: 15 October 2019 Publication History

Abstract

After the emergence of video streaming services, more creative and diverse multimedia content has become available, and now the capability of streaming 360-degree videos will open a new era of multimedia experiences. However, streaming these videos requires larger bandwidth and less latency than what is found in conventional video streaming systems. Rate adaptation of tiled videos and view prediction techniques are used to solve this problem. In this paper, we introduce the Navigation Graph, which models viewing behaviors in the temporal (segments) and the spatial (tiles) domains to perform the rate adaptation of tiled media associated with the view prediction. The Navigation Graph allows clients to perform view prediction more easily by sharing the viewing model in the same way in which media description information is shared in DASH. It is also useful for encoding the trajectory information in the media description file, which could also allow for more efficient navigation of 360-degree videos. This paper provides information about the creation of the Navigation Graph and its uses. The performance evaluation shows that the Navigation Graph based view prediction and rate adaptation outperform other existing tiled media streaming solutions. Navigation Graph is not limited to 360-degree video streaming applications, but it can also be applied to other tiled media streaming systems, such as volumetric media streaming for augmented reality applications.

References

[1]
Mathias Almquist, Viktor Almquist, Vengatanathan Krishnamoorthi, Niklas Carlsson, and Derek Eager. 2018. The Prefetch Aggressiveness Tradeoff in 360&Deg; Video Streaming. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM Multimedia Systems Conference (MMSys '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 258--269. https://doi.org/10.1145/3204949. 3204970
[2]
Y. Bao, H. Wu, T. Zhang, A. A. Ramli, and X. Liu. 2016. Shooting a moving target: Motion-prediction-based transmission for 360-degree videos. In 2016 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data). 1161--1170. https://doi.org/10. 1109/BigData.2016.7840720
[3]
F. Bellard. https://www.ffmpeg.org. (FFmpeg https://www.ffmpeg.org).
[4]
W. Chenglei, T. Zhihao, W. Zhi, and Y. Shiqiang. 2017. A Dataset for Exploring User Behaviors in VR Spherical Video Streaming. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM on Multimedia Systems Conference (MMSys'17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 193--198. https://doi.org/10.1145/3083187.3083210
[5]
V. R. Gaddam, M. Riegler, R. Eg, C. Griwodz, and P. Halvorsen. 2016. Tiling in Interactive Panoramic Video: Approaches and Evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 18, 9 (Sep. 2016), 1819--1831. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMM.2016. 2586304
[6]
A. Ghosh, V. Aggarwal, and F. Qian. 2018. A Robust Algorithm for Tile-based 360- degree Video Streaming with Uncertain FoV Estimation. CoRR abs/1812.00816 (2018). arXiv:1812.00816 http://arxiv.org/abs/1812.00816
[7]
M. Hosseini and V. Swaminathan. 2016. Adaptive 360 VR Video Streaming Based on MPEG-DASH SRD. In 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia (ISM). 407--408. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISM.2016.0093
[8]
K. Misra, A. Segall, M. Horowitz, S. Xu, A. Fuldseth, and M. Zhou. 2013. An Overview of Tiles in HEVC. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing 7, 6 (Dec 2013), 969--977. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTSP.2013.2271451
[9]
J. Park. 2019. Video Streaming over the LWA Systems. In 2019 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC). 597--601. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCNC.2019.8685626
[10]
J. Park, P. A. Chou, and J. Hwang. 2018. Volumetric Media Streaming for Augmented Reality. In 2018 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM). 1--6. https://doi.org/10.1109/GLOCOM.2018.8647537
[11]
J. Park, P. A. Chou, and J. Hwang. 2019. Rate-Utility Optimized Streaming of Volumetric Media for Augmented Reality. IEEE Journal on Emerging and Selected Topics in Circuits and Systems 9, 1 (March 2019), 149--162. https://doi.org/10.1109/ JETCAS.2019.2898622
[12]
J. Park, J. Hwang, and H. Wei. 2018. Cross-Layer Optimization for VR Video Multicast Systems. In 2018 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM). 206--212. https://doi.org/10.1109/GLOCOM.2018.8647389
[13]
R. A. Patrice, M. Jean-Franois, and V. Nico. 2012. Interactive Omnidirectional Video Delivery: A Bandwidth-Effective Approach. Bell Lab. Tech. J. 16, 4 (March 2012), 135--147. https://doi.org/10.1002/bltj.20538
[14]
R.Haakon, E. Tore, V Paul, G. Carsten, and H. Paul. 2012. Video Streaming Using a Location-based Bandwidth-lookup Service for Bitrate Planning. ACM Trans. Multimedia Comput. Commun. Appl. 8, 3, Article 24 (Aug. 2012), 19 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2240136.2240137
[15]
L. Sun, F. Duanmu, Y. Liu, Y. Wang, Y. Ye, H. Shi, and D. Dai. 2019. A Two-Tier System for On-Demand Streaming of 360 Degree Video Over Dynamic Networks. IEEE Journal on Emerging and Selected Topics in Circuits and Systems 9, 1 (March 2019), 43--57. https://doi.org/10.1109/JETCAS.2019.2898877
[16]
P. Wydrych, K. Rusek, and P. Cholda. 2013. Efficient Modelling of Traffic and Quality of Scalable Video Coding (SVC) Encoded Streams. IEEE Communications Letters 17, 12 (2013), 2372--2375. https://doi.org/10.1109/LCOMM.2013.110613. 132163
[17]
C. Xavier, D. Francesca, and S. Gwendal. 2017. 360Degreee Video Head Movement Dataset. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM on Multimedia Systems Conference (MMSys'17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 199--204. https://doi.org/10.1145/3083187. 3083215
[18]
M. Xiao, C. Zhou, V. Swaminathan, Y. Liu, and S. Chen. 2018. BAS-360 : Exploring Spatial and Temporal Adaptability in 360-degree Videos over HTTP/2. In IEEE INFOCOM 2018 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications. 953--961. https: //doi.org/10.1109/INFOCOM.2018.8486390
[19]
L. Xie, Z. Xu, Y. Ban, X. Zhang, and Z. Guo. 2017. 360ProbDASH: Improving QoE of 360 Video Streaming Using Tile-based HTTP Adaptive Streaming. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (MM '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 315--323. https://doi.org/10.1145/3123266.3123291
[20]
L. Xie, X. Zhang, and Z. Guo. 2018. CLS: A Cross-user Learning Based System for Improving QoE in 360-degree Video Adaptive Streaming. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (MM '18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 564--572. https://doi.org/10.1145/3240508.3240556
[21]
M. Xu, Y. Song, J. Wang, M. Qiao, L. Huo, and Z. Wang. 2018. Predicting Head Movement in Panoramic Video: A Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (2018), 1--1. https: //doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2018.2858783
[22]
M. Yu, H. Lakshman, and B. Girod. 2015. A Framework to Evaluate Omnidirectional Video Coding Schemes. In 2015 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality. 31--36. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR.2015.12

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
MM '19: Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Multimedia
October 2019
2794 pages
ISBN:9781450368896
DOI:10.1145/3343031
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 15 October 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. rate adaptation
  2. tiled media streaming
  3. view prediction

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

  • Ralf and Catherine Fisher Gift Funding
  • Coordinated Science Laboratory
  • Grainger College of Engineering

Conference

MM '19
Sponsor:

Acceptance Rates

MM '19 Paper Acceptance Rate 252 of 936 submissions, 27%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 2,145 of 8,556 submissions, 25%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)20
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 26 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media