skip to main content
10.1145/3292522.3326048acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswebsciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Understanding Brand Consistency from Web Content

Published: 26 June 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Brands produce content to engage with the audience continually and tend to maintain a set of human characteristics in their marketing campaigns. In this era of digital marketing, they need to create a lot of content to keep up the engagement with their audiences. However, such kind of content authoring at scale introduces challenges in maintaining consistency in a brand's messaging tone, which is very important from a brand's perspective to ensure a persistent impression for its customers and audiences. In this work, we quantify brand personality and formulate its linguistic features. We score text articles extracted from brand communications on five personality dimensions: sincerity, excitement, competence, ruggedness and sophistication, and show that a linear SVM model achieves a decent F1 score of $0.822$. The linear SVM allows us to annotate a large set of data points free of any annotation error. We utilize this huge annotated dataset to characterize the notion of brand consistency, which is maintaining a company's targeted brand personality across time and over different content categories; we make certain interesting observations. As per our knowledge, this is the first study which investigates brand personality from the company's official websites, and that formulates and analyzes the notion of brand consistency on such a large scale.

References

[1]
Jennifer L Aaker. 1997. Dimensions of brand personality. Journal of marketing research (1997), 347--356.
[2]
Pankaj Aggarwal. 2004. The effects of brand relationship norms on consumer attitudes and behavior. Journal of consumer research, Vol. 31, 1 (2004), 87--101.
[3]
Enrique Amigó, Jorge Carrillo-de Albornoz, Irina Chugur, Adolfo Corujo, Julio Gonzalo, Edgar Meij, Maarten de Rijke, and Damiano Spina. 2014a. Overview of RepLab 2014: Author Profiling and Reputation Dimensions for Online Reputation Management. In Information Access Evaluation. Multilinguality, Multimodality, and Interaction, Evangelos Kanoulas, Mihai Lupu, Paul Clough, Mark Sanderson, Mark Hall, Allan Hanbury, and Elaine Toms (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 307--322.
[4]
Enrique Amigó, Jorge Carrillo-de Albornoz, Irina Chugur, Adolfo Corujo, Julio Gonzalo, Edgar Meij, Maarten de Rijke, and Damiano Spina. 2014b. Overview of RepLab 2014: Author Profiling and Reputation Dimensions for Online Reputation Management. In Information Access Evaluation. Multilinguality, Multimodality, and Interaction, Evangelos Kanoulas, Mihai Lupu, Paul Clough, Mark Sanderson, Mark Hall, Allan Hanbury, and Elaine Toms (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 307--322.
[5]
Nitesh V. Chawla, Kevin W. Bowyer, Lawrence O. Hall, and W. Philip Kegelmeyer. 2002. SMOTE: Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique. J. Artif. Int. Res., Vol. 16, 1 (June 2002), 321--357. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1622407.1622416
[6]
Judy Delin. 2007. Brand Tone of Voice. Journal of Applied Linguistics, Vol. 2, 1 (2007). https://journals.equinoxpub.com/index.php/JAL/article/view/1471
[7]
Alecia Douglas, Juline Mills, and Raphael Kavanaugh. 2007. Exploring the use of emotional features at romantic destination websites. Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2007 (2007), 331--340.
[8]
J Peter Kincaid, Robert P Fishburne Jr, Richard L Rogers, and Brad S Chissom. 1975. Derivation of new readability formulas (automated readability index, fog count and flesch reading ease formula) for navy enlisted personnel. Technical Report. DTIC Document.
[9]
Shibamouli Lahiri. 2015. SQUINKY! A Corpus of Sentence-level Formality, Informativeness, and Implicature. arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.02306 (2015).
[10]
Wang Ling, Tiago Lu'is, Lu'is Marujo, Ramón Fernandez Astudillo, Silvio Amir, Chris Dyer, Alan W Black, and Isabel Trancoso. 2015. Finding function in form: Compositional character models for open vocabulary word representation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1508.02096 (2015).
[11]
Fei Liu, Julien Perez, and Scott Nowson. 2017a. A Language-independent and Compositional Model for Personality Trait Recognition from Short Texts. In Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Volume 1, Long Papers, Vol. 1. 754--764.
[12]
Liu Liu, Daria Dzyabura, and Natalie Mizik. 2018. Visual listening in: Extracting brand image portrayed on social media. In Workshops at the Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
[13]
X. Liu, A. Xu, L. Gou, H. Liu, R. Akkiraju, and H. Shen. 2016. SocialBrands: Visual analysis of public perceptions of brands on social media. In 2016 IEEE Conference on Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST). 71--80.
[14]
Zhe Liu, Anbang Xu, Yi Wang, Jerald Schoudt, Jalal Mahmud, and Rama Akkiraju. 2017b. Does Personality Matter?: A Study of Personality and Situational Effects on Consumer Behavior. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media (HT '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 185--193.
[15]
Natalia Maehle, Cele Otnes, and Magne Supphellen. 2011. Consumers' perceptions of the dimensions of brand personality. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, Vol. 10, 5 (2011), 290--303.
[16]
Francc ois Mairesse, Marilyn A Walker, Matthias R Mehl, and Roger K Moore. 2007. Using linguistic cues for the automatic recognition of personality in conversation and text. Journal of artificial intelligence research, Vol. 30 (2007), 457--500.
[17]
Brigitte Müller and Jean-Louis Chandon. 2003. The impact of visiting a brand website on brand personality. Electronic Markets, Vol. 13, 3 (2003), 210--221.
[18]
Ellie Pavlick and Joel Tetreault. 2016. An empirical analysis of formality in online communication. Transactions of the Association of Computational Linguistics, Vol. 4, 1 (2016), 61--74.
[19]
Joseph T. Plummer. 2000. How Personality Makes a Difference. Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 40, 6 (2000), 79--83. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC.2018.8422105
[20]
Yla R. Tausczik and James W. Pennebaker. 2010. The Psychological Meaning of Words: LIWC and Computerized Text Analysis Methods. (2010). http://homepage.psy.utexas.edu/homepage/students/Tausczik/Yla/index.html
[21]
Jing Wang and Min-Ling Zhang. 2018. Towards Mitigating the Class-Imbalance Problem for Partial Label Learning. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, KDD 2018, London, UK, August 19--23, 2018. 2427--2436.
[22]
Honghao Wei, Fuzheng Zhang, Nicholas Jing Yuan, Chuan Cao, Hao Fu, Xing Xie, Yong Rui, and Wei-Ying Ma. 2017. Beyond the Words: Predicting User Personality from Heterogeneous Information. In Proceedings of the Tenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 305--314.
[23]
Anbang Xu and Brian Bailey. 2012. What do you think?: a case study of benefit, expectation, and interaction in a large online critique community. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM, 295--304.
[24]
Anbang Xu, Haibin Liu, Liang Gou, Rama Akkiraju, Jalal Mahmud, Vibha Sinha, Yuheng Hu, and Mu Qiao. 2016. Predicting Perceived Brand Personality with Social Media. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Web and Social Media, Cologne, Germany, May 17--20, 2016. 436--445. http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM16/paper/view/13078
[25]
Zichao Yang, Diyi Yang, Chris Dyer, Xiaodong He, Alex Smola, and Eduard Hovy. 2016. Hierarchical attention networks for document classification. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 1480--1489.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
WebSci '19: Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Web Science
June 2019
395 pages
ISBN:9781450362023
DOI:10.1145/3292522
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 26 June 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. affective computing
  2. brand personality
  3. reputation management
  4. text classification

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Funding Sources

  • Science and Engineering Research Board New Delhi India

Conference

WebSci '19
Sponsor:
WebSci '19: 11th ACM Conference on Web Science
June 30 - July 3, 2019
Massachusetts, Boston, USA

Acceptance Rates

WebSci '19 Paper Acceptance Rate 41 of 130 submissions, 32%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 245 of 933 submissions, 26%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)144
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)20
Reflects downloads up to 07 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media