skip to main content
10.1145/3292147.3292167acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesozchiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Characterizing participation across social media sites amongst young adults with intellectual disability

Published: 04 December 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Young Adults with Intellectual Disability (YAID) are interested in participating in social media as it offers opportunities for their social participation and inclusion. However, the literature remains incomplete on the nature of participation across popular social media sites by YAID, and how different social media sites fulfil their participation interests. To explore this, we employed a mixed methods approach involving interviews, participant observation, training workshops, and a survey with YAID. We found that participation interests varied between platforms: all participants used YouTube for entertainment, some participated in Facebook to stay connected with family, whereas Snapchat and Instagram were used for playful interaction with strangers. Awareness of online safety emerged as a key competence, while literacy, authentication, netiquette and disruption from advertising content adversely affected participation. We discuss how to address these issues to support and sustain participation, as well as opportunities for leveraging participation in social media for skills development.

References

[1]
AAIDD. Intellectual Disability Definition. Definition of Intellectual Disability. Retrieved July 25, 2018 from http://aaidd.org/intellectual-disability/definition
[2]
Australian Bureau of Statistic. 2013. Main Features young adults: Retrieved September 25, 2018 http://www.abs.gov.au/
[3]
Lisa Marie Blaschke. 2014. Using social media to engage and develop the online learner in self-determined learning. Research in Learning Technology 22, (2014).
[4]
Natilene Bowker and Keith Tuffin. 2002. Disability discourses for online identities. Disability & Society 17, 3 (2002), 327--344.
[5]
Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77--101.
[6]
Margot Brereton, Laurianne Sitbon, Muhammad Haziq Lim Abdullah, Mark Vanderberg, and Stewart Koplick. 2015. Design after design to bridge between people living with cognitive or sensory impairments, their friends and proxies. CoDesign 11, 1 (January 2015), 4--20.
[7]
Petra C. M. Buijs, Erik Boot, Andrea Shugar, Wai Lun Alan Fung, and Anne S. Bassett. 2017. Internet Safety Issues for Adolescents and Adults with Intellectual Disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 30, 2 (March 2017), 416--418.
[8]
Moira Burke and Robert E. Kraut. 2014. Growing closer on facebook: changes in tie strength through social network site use. 4187--4196.
[9]
Martin C. Carlisle. 2010. Using You Tube to enhance student class preparation in an introductory Java course. 470.
[10]
Sue Caton and Melanie Chapman. 2016. The use of social media and people with intellectual disability: A systematic review and thematic analysis. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability 41, 2 (April 2016), 125--139.
[11]
Darren D. Chadwick and Chris Fullwood. 2017. An Online Life Like Any Other: Identity, Self-Determination, and Social Networking Among Adults with Intellectual Disabilities. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking (August 2017).
[12]
Darren D. Chadwick, Sally Quinn, and Chris Fullwood. 2017. Perceptions of the risks and benefits of Internet access and use by people with intellectual disabilities. Br J Learn Disabil 45, 1 (March 2017), 21--31.
[13]
Kathy Charmaz. 2014. Constructing Grounded Theory. SAGE.
[14]
Philippa Collin, Kitty Rahilly, Ingrid Richardson, Amanda Third, and Technology and Wellbeing Cooperative Research Centre for Young People. 2011. The benefits of social networking services: literature review.
[15]
Robert Didden, Ron H. J. Scholte, Hubert Korzilius, Jan M. H. de Moor, Anne Vermeulen, Mark O'Reilly, Russell Lang, and Giulio E. Lancioni. 2009. Cyberbullying among students with intellectual and developmental disability in special education settings. Developmental Neurorehabilitation 12, 3 (January 2009), 146--151.
[16]
Peter Duffy. 2008. Engaging the YouTube Google-Eyed Generation: Strategies for Using Web 2.0 in Teaching and Learning. Electronic Journal of e-Learning 6, 2 (2008), 119--130. Retrieved June 21, 2018 from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1098687
[17]
Aboozar Eghdam, Ulrika Hamidi, Aniko Bartfai, and Sabine Koch. 2018. Facebook as communication support for persons with potential mild acquired cognitive impairment: A content and social network analysis study. PLOS ONE 13, 1 (January 2018), e0191878.
[18]
Nicole B. Ellison, Charles Steinfield, and Cliff Lampe. 2007. The Benefits of Facebook "Friends:" Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites. J Comput Mediat Commun 12, 4 (July 2007), 1143--1168.
[19]
Jinjuan Feng, Jonathan Lazar, Libby Kumin, and Ant Ozok. 2010. Computer Usage by Children with Down Syndrome: Challenges and Future Research. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing 2, 3 (March 2010), 1--44.
[20]
Casey Fiesler, Shannon Morrison, R. Benjamin Shapiro, and Amy S. Bruckman. 2017. Growing Their Own: Legitimate Peripheral Participation for Computational Learning in an Online Fandom Community. 1375--1386.
[21]
Jordan Hayes, Xiao Li, and Yang Wang. 2017. "I Always Have to Think About It First": Authentication Experiences of People with Cognitive Impairments. 357--358.
[22]
Katrina M. Holmes and Nessa O'Loughlin. 2014. The experiences of people with learning disabilities on social networking sites. Br J Learn Disabil 42, 1 (March 2014), 1--5.
[23]
Adam N Joinson. 2008. 'Looking at', 'Looking up' or 'Keeping up with' People? Motives and Uses of Facebook. Online Social Networks (2008), 10.
[24]
Andreas M. Kaplan and Michael Haenlein. 2010. Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons 53, 1 (January 2010), 59--68.
[25]
Kawaljeet Kaur Kapoor, Kuttimani Tamilmani, Nripendra P. Rana, Pushp Patil, Yogesh K. Dwivedi, and Sridhar Nerur. 2018. Advances in Social Media Research: Past, Present and Future. Information Systems Frontiers 20, 3 (June 2018), 531--558.
[26]
Tuuli Keskinen, Tomi Heimonen, Markku Turunen, Juha-Pekka Rajaniemi, and Sami Kauppinen. 2012. SymbolChat: A flexible picture-based communication platform for users with intellectual disabilities. Interacting with Computers 24, 5 (September 2012), 374--386.
[27]
Yong Ming Kow and Timothy Young. 2013. Media technologies and learning in the starcraft esport community. 387.
[28]
Alla Kravets, Maxim Shcherbakov, Marina Kultsova, and Olga Shabalina (Eds.). 2015. Design of Mobile Applications for People with Intellectual Disabilities. In Creativity in Intelligent Technologies and Data Science. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 823--836.
[29]
Frederik Kydland, Judith Molka-Danielsen, and Susan Balandin. 2012. Examining the use of social media tool "Flickr" for impact on loneliness for people with intellectual disability. In NOKOBIT 2012: Proceedings of the 2012 Norsk konferanse for organisasjoners bruk av informasjonsteknologi, 253--264.
[30]
Jonathan Lazar, Libby Kumin, and Jinjuan Heidi Feng. 2011. Understanding the computer skills of adult expert users with down syndrome: an exploratory study. In The proceedings of the 13th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility, 51--58. Retrieved September 9, 2017 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2049548
[31]
Peyina Lin and Shelly D. Farnham. 2013. Opportunities via extended networks for teens' informal learning. 1341.
[32]
Lotta Løfgren-M\a artenson and Sven-Axel M\a ansson. 2006. Different porn careers?-On girl's and boy's porn consumption. (2006).
[33]
Lotta Löfgren-Mårtenson. 2008. Love in Cyberspace: Swedish Young People with Intellectual Disabilities and the Internet. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 10, 2 (June 2008), 125--138.
[34]
Lotta Löfgren-Mårtenson. 2008. Love in Cyberspace: Swedish Young People with Intellectual Disabilities and the Internet. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 10, 2 (June 2008), 125--138.
[35]
Alex McClimens and Frances Gordon. 2008. Presentation of self in Everyday life: How people labelled with intellectual disability manage identity as they engage the blogosphere. Sociological Research Online 13, 4 (2008), 1--13.
[36]
Alex McClimens and Frances Gordon. 2009. People with intellectual disabilities as bloggers: What's social capital got to do with it anyway? J Intellect Disabil 13, 1 (March 2009), 19--30.
[37]
Martin Molin, Emma Sorbring, and Lotta Löfgren-M\a artenson. 2017. New Em@ncipatory landscapes? Young people with intellectual disabilities, Internet use and Identification processes. (2017).
[38]
Sarah Parsons, Harry Daniels, Jill Porter, and Christopher Robertson. 2006. The use of ICT by adults with learning disabilities in day and residential services. British Journal of Educational Technology 37, 1 (2006), 31--44.
[39]
Pew Research Center. Younger adults much more likely to use social media| Pew Research Center. Retrieved September 25, 2018 from http://www.pewglobal.org/2018/06/19/3-social-network-adoption-varies-widely-by-country/pg_2018-06-19_global-tech_3-02/
[40]
Goldie Salimkhan, Adriana M. Manago, and Patricia M. Greenfield. 2010. The Construction of the Virtual Self on MySpace. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace 4, 1 (June 2010). Retrieved October 10, 2017 from https://cyberpsychology.eu/article/view/4231
[41]
François Sallafranque-St-Louis and Claude L. Normand. 2017. From solitude to solicitation: How people with intellectual disability or autism spectrum disorder use the internet. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace 11, 1 (May 2017).
[42]
Tom Shakespeare. 2006. The social model of disability. The disability studies reader 2, (2006), 197--204.
[43]
Carmit-Noa Shpigelman and Carol J. Gill. 2014. Facebook Use by Persons with Disabilities. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 19, 3 (April 2014), 610--624.
[44]
Laurianne Sitbon, Andrew Bayor, Filip Bircanin, Stewart Koplick, and Margot Brereton. 2018. An Exploration of How People with Intellectual Disability Engage with Online Information Retrieval. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '18, 1--6.
[45]
Statista. 2018. Leading global social networks 2018 | Statistic. Statista. Retrieved July 26, 2018 https://www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-social-networks-ranked-by-number-of-users/
[46]
Charles Steinfield, Nicole B. Ellison, and Cliff Lampe. 2008. Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 29, 6 (November 2008), 434--445.
[47]
Brian Tarran. 2018. What can we learn from the Facebook---Cambridge Analytica scandal? Significance 15, 3 (2018), 4--5.
[48]
Jennyfer Lawrence Taylor, Alessandro Soro, Paul Roe, Anita Lee Hong, and Margot Brereton. 2018. "Debrief O'Clock": Planning, Recording, and Making Sense of a Day in the Field in Design Research. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '18, 1--14.
[49]
María Rosalía Vicente and Ana Jesús López. 2010. A Multidimensional Analysis of the Disability Digital Divide: Some Evidence for Internet Use. The Information Society 26, 1 (January 2010), 48--64.
[50]
Sarah Weir, Juho Kim, Krzysztof Z. Gajos, and Robert C. Miller. 2015. Learnersourcing Subgoal Labels for How-to Videos. 405--416.
[51]
Jacob O. Wobbrock, Shaun K. Kane, Krzysztof Z. Gajos, Susumu Harada, and Jon Froehlich. 2011. Ability-Based Design: Concept, Principles and Examples. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing 3, 3 (April 2011), 1--27.
[52]
Discover NVivo for yourself with a free 14-day trial | NVivo. Retrieved June 17, 2018 https://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo/trial/trial-confirmation

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Characterizing participation across social media sites amongst young adults with intellectual disability

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    OzCHI '18: Proceedings of the 30th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction
    December 2018
    639 pages
    ISBN:9781450361880
    DOI:10.1145/3292147
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 04 December 2018

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. competencies
    2. intellectual disability
    3. online participation
    4. social media
    5. socio-technical issues

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    OzCHI '18

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 362 of 729 submissions, 50%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)76
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)11
    Reflects downloads up to 06 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Social-Digital Inclusion of People with Intellectual Disability: a study with the assisted of APAE in Serra TalhadaJournal on Interactive Systems10.5753/jis.2024.377715:1(741-749)Online publication date: 25-Jul-2024
    • (2024)Towards Digital Independence: Identifying the Tensions between Autistic Young Adults and Their Support Network When Mediating Social MediaProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642567(1-21)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)Empowering Independence Through Design: Investigating Standard Digital Design Patterns For Easy-to-Read Users.Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3641911(1-18)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
    • (2024)Assistive Technology Uses and Barriers in the Home and Workplace for Adults With Intellectual and Developmental DisabilitiesJournal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities10.1111/jar.1330638:1Online publication date: 27-Oct-2024
    • (2024)Bridging the digital divide for individuals with intellectual disabilities: Implications for well‐being and inclusionBritish Journal of Learning Disabilities10.1111/bld.12613Online publication date: 25-Jul-2024
    • (2023)Guiding non-verbal conversation about meal choices with intelligent technologiesProceedings of the 35th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference10.1145/3638380.3638443(350-359)Online publication date: 2-Dec-2023
    • (2023)Designing gardening applications to engage people with intellectual disability in gardening activitiesProceedings of the 35th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference10.1145/3638380.3638406(415-422)Online publication date: 2-Dec-2023
    • (2023)Adults with intellectual disabilities as users of social media: A scoping reviewBritish Journal of Learning Disabilities10.1111/bld.1253451:4(544-564)Online publication date: 22-May-2023
    • (2023)ICT use and competencies of school children with intellectual disabilities in low-resource settings: the case of Ghana in sub-Saharan AfricaUniversal Access in the Information Society10.1007/s10209-023-01059-xOnline publication date: 28-Oct-2023
    • (2022)Influencers with physical disabilities on Instagram: Features, visibility and business collaborationEl Profesional de la información10.3145/epi.2022.nov.12Online publication date: 23-Nov-2022
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media