research-article

Our House: Living Long Distance with a Telepresence Robot

Authors:

Carman NeustaedterAuthors Info & Claims

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Volume 2, Issue CSCW

Article No.: 190, Pages 1 - 18

https://doi.org/10.1145/3274459

Published: 01 November 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Many couples live in long distance arrangements due to a variety of reasons from work opportunities to family obligations. However, current computer-mediated communication tools are not designed to support the entire range of communication behaviors that couples engage in during daily life. Our research explored how telepresence robots might fit into the array of tools that long distance couples use to communicate, given the factors of mobility and physicality that could support acts of interactivity and autonomy between partners. We found that telepresence robot communication facilitated interactions in five areas: participation in mundane everyday routines, feelings of sharing a home, connection with one's partner's family and friends, increased helpfulness, and the enjoyment of quiet companionship. However, telepresence robots also presented challenges related to privacy and asymmetry, as well as continued deficiencies in the level of interactivity. In response to these findings, we discuss the design implications for telepresence robots.

References

[1]

Almond Pilar N. Aguila. 2011. Living long-distance relationships through computer-mediated communication. Social Science Diliman 5, 1&2. Retrieved October 6, 2016 from http://journals.upd.edu.ph/index.php/socialsciencediliman/article/viewArticle/2045

[2]

Elizabeth Bales, Kevin A. Li, and William Griwsold. 2011. CoupleVIBE: mobile implicit communication to improve awareness for (long-distance) couples. 65.

[3]

Richard Bloss. 2011. High school student goes to class robotically. Industrial Robot: An International Journal 38, 5: 465--468.

[4]

Marianne Dainton and Brooks Aylor. 2002. Patterns of communication channel use in the maintenance of long-distance relationships. Communication Research Reports 19, 2: 118--129.

[5]

Elizabeth Goodman and Marion Misilim. 2003. The Sensing Beds. Ubicomp 2003 Workshop: 3.

[6]

Laura K. Guerrero, Sylvie V. Eloy, and Alisa I. Wabnik. 1993. Linking maintenance strategies to relationship development and disengagement: a reconceptualization. 10: 273--283.

[7]

Richard Harper, Sean Rintel, Rod Watson, and Kenton O'Hara. 2017. The 'interrogative gaze': Making video calling and messaging 'accountable.' Pragmatics 27, 3: 319--350.

[8]

Marc Hassenzahl, Stephanie Heidecker, Kai Eckoldt, Sarah Diefenbach, and Uwe Hillmann. 2012. All You Need is Love: Current Strategies of Mediating Intimate Relationships through Technology. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 19, 4: 1--19.

Digital Library

[9]

Debby Hindus, Scott D. Mainwaring, Nicole Leduc, Anna Elizabeth Hagström, and Oliver Bayley. 2001. Casablanca: designing social communication devices for the home. 325--332.

Digital Library

[10]

Steven Johnson, Irene Rae, Bilge Mutlu, and Leila Takayama. 2015. Can You See Me Now?: How Field of View Affects Collaboration in Robotic Telepresence. 2397--2406.

Digital Library

[11]

Yeong Rae Joi, Beom Taek Jeong, Jin Hwang Kim, Ki Hyuk Park, Taehyun Lee, and Jun Dong Cho. 2015. WearLove: Affective Communication via Wearable Device with Gamification. 559--564.

Digital Library

[12]

Norman P. Jouppi. 2002. First steps towards mutually-immersive mobile telepresence. In Proceedings of the 2002 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, 354--363. Retrieved November 5, 2016 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=587128

Digital Library

[13]

Atsunobu Kimura, Masayuki Ihara, Minoru Kobayashi, Yoshitsugu Manabe, and Kunihiro Chihara. 2007. Visual feedback: its effect on teleconferencing. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 591--600. Retrieved November 26, 2016 from http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978--3--540--73111--5_67

Digital Library

[14]

David Knox, Marty E. Zusman, Vivian Daniels, and Angle Brantley. 2002. Absence Makes the Heart Grow Fonder?: Long Distance Dating Relationships Among College Students. College Student Journal 36, 3: 364.

[15]

Saso Koceski and Natasa Koceska. 2016. Evaluation of an Assistive Telepresence Robot for Elderly Healthcare. Journal of Medical Systems 40, 5.

Digital Library

[16]

Robert Kowalski, Sebastian Loehmann, and Doris Hausen. 2013. cubble: a multi-device hybrid approach supporting communication in long-distance relationships. 201.

[17]

Annica Kristoffersson, Silvia Coradeschi, and Amy Loutfi. 2011. Towards evaluation of social robotic telepresence based on measures of social and spatial presence. In Human Robot Interaction. Retrieved November 5, 2016 from http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:542612

[18]

Min Kyung Lee and Leila Takayama. 2011. Now, I have a body: Uses and social norms for mobile remote presence in the workplace. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 33--42. Retrieved November 26, 2016 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1978950

Digital Library

[19]

Danielle Lottridge, Nicolas Masson, and Wendy Mackay. 2009. Sharing empty moments: design for remote couples. 2329.

Digital Library

[20]

Katheryn C. Maguire and Terry A. Kinney. 2010. When Distance is Problematic: Communication, Coping, and Relational Satisfaction in Female College Students' Long-Distance Dating Relationships. Journal of Applied Communication Research 38, 1: 27--46.

[21]

Carman Neustaedter and Saul Greenberg. 2012. Intimacy in long-distance relationships over video chat. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.

Digital Library

[22]

Carman Neustaedter, Gina Venolia, Jason Procyk, and Dan Hawkins. 2016. To Beam or Not to Beam: A Study of Remote Telepresence Attendance at an Academic Conference. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, 417--430.

Digital Library

[23]

Veronica Ahumada Newhart and Judith S. Olson. 2017. My Student is a Robot: How Schools Manage Telepresence Experiences for Students. 342--347.

Digital Library

[24]

Kenton O'Hara, Alison Black, and Matthew Lipson. 2009. Media Spaces and Mobile Video Telephony. In Media Space 20 + Years of Mediated Life, Steve Harrison (ed.). Springer London, London, 303--323.

[25]

Rui Pan, Samarth Singhal, Bernhard E. Riecke, Emily Cramer, and Carman Neustaedter. 2017. "MyEyes": The Design and Evaluation of First Person View Video Streaming for Long-Distance Couples. 135--146.

Digital Library

[26]

E. Paulos and J. Canny. 1996. Delivering real reality to the World Wide Web via telerobotics. 1694--1699.

[27]

Irene Rae. 2015. How Telepresence Robots Shape Communication. University of Wisconsin-Madison.

[28]

Irene Rae, Leila Takayama, and Bilge Mutlu. 2013. The influence of height in robot-mediated communication. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction, 1--8. Retrieved September 18, 2016 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2447558

Digital Library

[29]

Samarth Singhal, Carman Neustaedter, Yee Loong Ooi, Alissa N. Antle, and Brendan Matkin. 2017. Flex-N-Feel: The Design and Evaluation of Emotive Gloves for Couples to Support Touch Over Distance. 98--110.

Digital Library

[30]

Breeana Skinner. 2005. Perceptions of college students in long distance relationships. UW-L Journal of Undergraduate Research VIII. Retrieved December 10, 2016 from http://www.uwlax.edu/urc/jur-online/PDF/2005/skinner.pdf

[31]

L. Stafford and A. J. Merolla. 2007. Idealization, reunions, and stability in long-distance dating relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 24, 1: 37--54.

[32]

Laura Stafford. 2005. Maintaining Long-Distance and Cross-Residential Relationships. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

[33]

Laura Stafford and Daniel J. Canary. 1991. Maintenance strategies and romantic relationship type, gender, and relational characteristics. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 8: 217--242.

[34]

Rob Strong, Bill Gaver, and others. 1996. Feather, scent and shaker: supporting simple intimacy. In Proceedings of CSCW, 29--30. Retrieved October 9, 2016 from https://www.gold.ac.uk/media/migrated/media/goldsmiths/departments/researchcentres/interactionresearchstudio/pdf/16strong-gaver.feather.cscw96.pdf

[35]

Peter Tolmie, James Pycock, Tim Diggins, Allan MacLean, and Alain Karsenty. 2002. Unremarkable computing. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '02).

Digital Library

[36]

Katherine M. Tsui, Munjal Desai, Holly A. Yanco, and Chris Uhlik. 2011. Exploring use cases for telepresence robots. In 2011 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 11--18. Retrieved October 16, 2016 from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=6281254

Digital Library

[37]

Lillian Yang, Carman Neustaedter, and Thecla Schiphorst. 2017. Communicating Through A Telepresence Robot: A Study of Long Distance Relationships. 3027--3033.

Digital Library

Cited By

Berhane RAkiode DJoshi SElmimouni H(2025)Integrating Function and Connection: Two Perspectives to Telepresence Robot Design for ClassroomCompanion Proceedings of the 2025 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work10.1145/3688828.3699633(9-14)Online publication date: 12-Jan-2025
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3688828.3699633
Rapp ADi Lodovico CTorrielli FDi Caro L(2025)How do people experience the images created by generative artificial intelligence? An exploration of people's perceptions, appraisals, and emotions related to a Gen-AI text-to-image model and its creationsInternational Journal of Human-Computer Studies10.1016/j.ijhcs.2024.103375193:COnline publication date: 1-Jan-2025
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2024.103375
Matsushima KKubota TMurakami HSato SOgawa K(2024)Voice Volume Gauge to Encourage Vocal Adaptation of an Operator of a Teleoperated Social RobotProceedings of the 12th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction10.1145/3687272.3688313(91-99)Online publication date: 24-Nov-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3687272.3688313
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Our House: Living Long Distance with a Telepresence Robot
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Human computer interaction (HCI)

Recommendations

An Autobiographical Design Study of a Long Distance Relationship: When Telepresence Robots Meet Smart Home Tools
DIS '20: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference

Long distance couples often face challenges in maintaining their relationship over distance because computer-mediated communication tools typically only support a limited range of relationship maintenance behaviors. To explore a broader design space ...
Communicating Through A Telepresence Robot: A Study of Long Distance Relationships
CHI EA '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Telepresence robots have the potential to better replicate the qualities of in-person interactions than traditional communication tools, however, there are few studies of their use in domestic contexts. In our study, we explored how two long distance ...
Geocaching with a Beam: Shared Outdoor Activities through a Telepresence Robot with 360 Degree Viewing
CHI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

People often enjoy sharing outdoor activities together such as walking and hiking. However, when family and friends are separated by distance it can be difficult if not impossible to share such activities. We explore this design space by investigating ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction Volume 2, Issue CSCW

November 2018

4104 pages

EISSN:2573-0142

DOI:10.1145/3290265

Editors:
Karrie Karahalios
University of Illinois & Adobe
,
Andrés Monroy-Hernández
Snap Inc.
,
Airi Lampinen
Stockholm University
,
Geraldine Fitzpatrick
Vienna University of Technology

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © 2018 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 November 2018

Published in PACMHCI Volume 2, Issue CSCW

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

44
Total Citations
View Citations
593
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)87
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)8

Reflects downloads up to 06 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Berhane RAkiode DJoshi SElmimouni H(2025)Integrating Function and Connection: Two Perspectives to Telepresence Robot Design for ClassroomCompanion Proceedings of the 2025 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work10.1145/3688828.3699633(9-14)Online publication date: 12-Jan-2025
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3688828.3699633
Rapp ADi Lodovico CTorrielli FDi Caro L(2025)How do people experience the images created by generative artificial intelligence? An exploration of people's perceptions, appraisals, and emotions related to a Gen-AI text-to-image model and its creationsInternational Journal of Human-Computer Studies10.1016/j.ijhcs.2024.103375193:COnline publication date: 1-Jan-2025
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2024.103375
Matsushima KKubota TMurakami HSato SOgawa K(2024)Voice Volume Gauge to Encourage Vocal Adaptation of an Operator of a Teleoperated Social RobotProceedings of the 12th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction10.1145/3687272.3688313(91-99)Online publication date: 24-Nov-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3687272.3688313
Dybboe MEllemose JVastrup ABoudouraki ARintel SPetersen MGrønbæk JKlokmose C(2024)TableBot: Getting a Handle on Hybrid Collaboration by Negotiating Control of a Tabletop Telepresence RobotProceedings of the 13th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/3679318.3685350(1-15)Online publication date: 13-Oct-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3679318.3685350
Elmimouni HŠabanović SRode J(2024)Navigating the Cyborg Classroom: Telepresence Robots, Accessibility Challenges, and Inclusivity in the ClassroomACM Transactions on Accessible Computing10.1145/367256917:2(1-21)Online publication date: 14-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3672569
Johansen SBrophy CRittenbruch MDonovan J(2024)Characterising CSCW Research on Human-Robot CollaborationProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36409998:CSCW1(1-31)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3640999
Kablo EKader KArias-Cabarcos P(2024)"I'm actually going to go and change these passwords": Analyzing the Usability of Credential Audit Interfaces in Password ManagersExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3650889(1-13)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613905.3650889
Seo JLim HSuh BLee J(2024)I feel being there, they feel being together: Exploring How Telepresence Robots Facilitate Long-Distance Family CommunicationProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642305(1-18)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642305
Fox Tree JHerring SNguyen AWhittaker SMartin RTakayama L(2024)Conversational Fluency and Attitudes Towards Robot Pilots in Telepresence Robot-Mediated InteractionsComputer Supported Cooperative Work10.1007/s10606-023-09476-533:3(473-498)Online publication date: 1-Sep-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1007/s10606-023-09476-5
Rapp ABoldi A(2023)Exploring the Lived Experience of Behavior Change Technologies: Towards an Existential Model of Behavior Change for HCIACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/360349730:6(1-50)Online publication date: 25-Sep-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3603497
Show More Cited By

View Options

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents