skip to main content
10.1145/3267242.3267245acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Wearable sensors for recognizing individuals undertaking daily activities

Published: 08 October 2018 Publication History

Abstract

With the fast evolution in the area of processing units and sensors, wearable devices are becoming more popular among people of all ages. Recently, there has been renewed interest in exploiting the capabilities of wearable sensors for person recognition while undertaking their normal daily activities. In this paper, we focus on utilizing motion information of known daily activities gathered from wearable sensors for recognizing the person. The analysis of the results demonstrates that different fundamental classification factors have an impact on person recognition success-rates. Furthermore, the results of comparison among subjects prove that some subjects have high classification results and can be easily identifiable compared to other subjects which have high confusability rates. Lastly, a significant improvement in subject classification success rate was found for activities with little or no movement which can successfully distinguish among persons and hence producing higher classification results compared to activities with large movement.

References

[1]
Qiong Gui, Zhanpeng Jin, and Wenyao Xu. 2014. Exploring EEG-based biometrics for user identification and authentication. In Signal Processing in Medicine and Biology Symposium (SPMB), 2014 IEEE. IEEE, 1--6.
[2]
Alexandras Iosifidis, Anastasios Tefas, and Ioannis Pitas. 2012. Activity-based person identification using fuzzy representation and discriminant learning. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security 7, 2 (2012), 530--542.
[3]
Christopher McCool, Sebastien Marcel, Abdenour Hadid, Matti Pietikäinen, Pavel Matejka, Jan Cernockỳ, Norman Poh, Josef Kittler, Anthony Larcher, Christophe Levy, and others. 2012. Bi-modal person recognition on a mobile phone: using mobile phone data. In Multimedia and Expo Workshops (ICMEW), 2012 IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 635--640.
[4]
Brent C Munsell, Andrew Temlyakov, Chengzheng Qu, and Song Wang. 2012. Person identification using full-body motion and anthropometric biometrics from kinect videos. In European Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, 91--100.
[5]
V Ramu Reddy, Tanushyam Chattopadhyay, Kingshuk Chakravarty, and Aniruddha Sinha. 2014. Person identification from arbitrary position and posture using kinect. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Embedded Network Sensor Systems. ACM, 350--351.
[6]
MATLAB Statistics and Machine Learning Toolbox Release. 2016. The MathWorks Inc. Natick, Massachusetts, United States (2016).
[7]
Liana E Taylor, Umran A Abdulla, Michael G Barlow, and Ken Taylor. 2017. Detecting and exploiting periodicity in activity classification. In Serious Games and Applications for Health (SeGAH), 2017 IEEE 5th International Conference on. IEEE, 1--8.
[8]
Jin Wang, Mary She, Saeid Nahavandi, and Abbas Kouzani. 2010. A review of vision-based gait recognition methods for human identification. In Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications (DICTA), 2010 International Conference on. IEEE, 320--327.
[9]
Changwoo Yoon, Muhammad Zubair, and Kibong Song. 2017. Human Activity Recognition Using Wearable Sensors: Research Review. International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Technology 6, 2 (2017), 66-70.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Wearable sensors for recognizing individuals undertaking daily activities

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    ISWC '18: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers
    October 2018
    307 pages
    ISBN:9781450359672
    DOI:10.1145/3267242
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 08 October 2018

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. classification factors
    2. classification success-rates
    3. daily activities
    4. person recognition
    5. wearable sensors

    Qualifiers

    • Short-paper

    Conference

    UbiComp '18

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 38 of 196 submissions, 19%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)27
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
    Reflects downloads up to 28 Dec 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media