research-article

Commercialization of multimodal systems

Authors:

The Handbook of Multimodal-Multisensor Interfaces: Language Processing, Software, Commercialization, and Emerging Directions - Volume 3

July 2019

Pages 621 - 658

https://doi.org/10.1145/3233795.3233812

Published: 01 July 2019 Publication History

Get Access

References

[1]

S. Al Moubayed, J. Beskow, G. Skantze, and B. Granström. 2012. Furhat: a back-projected human-like robot head for multiparty human-machine interaction. Cognitive Behavioural Systems. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer. 633

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[2]

M. Allodi, A. Broggi, D. Giaquinto, M. Patander, and A. Prioletti. 2016. Machine learning in tracking associations with stereo vision and lidar observations for an autonomous vehicle. In IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), 2016, pp. 648--653. 625, 626, 777

Google Scholar

[3]

E. Alpaydin. 2018. Classifying multimodal data. In S. Oviatt, B. Schuller, P. Cohen, D. Sonntag, G. Potamianos, and A. Krüger, editors, Handbook of Multimodal-Multisensor Interfaces, Volume 2: Signal Processing, Architectures, and Detection of Emotion and Cognition. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, San Rafael, CA. 636

Google Scholar

[4]

A. Aviles-Rivero, S. M. Alsaleh, J. Philbeck, S. P. Raventos, N. Younes, J. K. Hahn, and A. Casals. August 2018. Sensory substitution for force feedback recovery: a perception experimental study. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP), 15(3). 629

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[5]

J. Barnett, R. Akolkar, R. J. Auburn, M. Bodell, D. C. Burnett, J. Carter, S. McGlashan, T. Lager, M. Helbing, R. Hosn, T. V. Raman, K. Reifenrath, and N. Rosenthal. 2015. State Chart XML (SCXML): State machine notation for control abstraction. http://www.w3.org/TR/scxml/ 640

Google Scholar

[6]

M. J. Barry, P. M. Gallagher, J. S. Skinner, and F. J. Fowler Jr. February 2012. Adverse Effects of Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Versus Open Retropubic Radical Prostatectomy Among a Nationwide Random Sample of Medicare-Age Men. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 30(5): 513--518. 628

Crossref

Google Scholar

[7]

B. T. Bethea, A. M. Okamura, M. Kitagawa, T. P. Fitton, S. M. Cattaneo, V. L. Gott, W. A. Baumgartner, and D. D. Yuh. June 2004. Application of Haptic Feedback to Robotic Surgery. Journal Laparoendosc Advanced Surgical Techniques, 14(3): 191--195. 629

Crossref

Google Scholar

[8]

L. Bodenhagen, S. D. Suvei, W. K. Juel, E. Brander, and N. Krüger. 2019. Robot technology for future welfare: meeting upcoming societal challenges---an outlook with offset in the development in Scandinavia, Health Technology. 635

Google Scholar

[9]

D. Bohus, S. Andrist, and M. Jalobeanu. November 2017. Rapid development of multimodal interactive systems: a demonstration of platform for situated intelligence. ICMI 2017 Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction. 641

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[10]

J. Cacace, A. Finzi, and V. Lippiello. 2016. Multimodal interaction with multiple co-located drones in search and rescue mission. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. RoMan.

Google Scholar

[11]

S. Calderwood, K. McAreavey, W. Liu, J. Hong. 2017. Context-dependent combination of sensor information in Dempster-Shafer theory for BDI. Knowledge Information System. 51, 259--285. 624, 767

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[12]

D. Cameron, A. Millings, S. Fernando, E. Collins, R. Moore, A. Sharkey, V. Evers, and T. Prescott. April 2015. The effects of robot facial emotional expressions and gender on child-robot interaction in a field study. 4th International Symposium on New Frontiers in Human-Robot Interaction, 632

Google Scholar

[13]

R. O. Chavez-Garcia and O. Aycard. 2016. Multiple sensor fusion and classification for moving object detection and tracking. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 17(2): 525--534. 626

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[14]

J. Choi, S. Ulbrich, B. Lichte, and M. Maurer. 2013. Multi-target tracking using a 3d-lidar sensor for autonomous vehicles. 16th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems-(ITSC), pp. 881--88. 626

Google Scholar

[15]

K. Dautenhahn, C. L. Nehaniv, M. L. Walters, B. Robins, H. Kose-Bagci, N. Assif Mirza, and M. Blow. 2009. KASPAR-a minimally expressive humanoid robot for human-robot interaction research. Applied Bionics and Biomechanics, 6(3--4): 369--397. 635

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[16]

L. A. Dickstein-Fischer, D. E. Crone-Todd, I. M. Chapman, A. T. Fathima, and G. S. Fischer. 2018. Socially assistive robots: current status and future prospects for autism interventions. Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Health, 5: 15--25. 635

Crossref

Google Scholar

[17]

J. J. Diehl, L. M. Schmitt, M. Villano, and C. R. Crowell. 2012. The clinical use of robots for individuals with autism spectrum disorders: a critical review, Research in Autism Spectrum Disorder, 6(1): 249--262. 635

Crossref

Google Scholar

[18]

P. Ekman and W. V. Friesen. 1978. Facial action coding system. A Technique for Measuring Facial Movement, Consulting Psychologists Press. Palo Alto. 643

Google Scholar

[19]

J. Elfring, R. Appeldoorn, S. van den Dries and M. Kwakkernaat. 2016. Effective world modeling: Multisensor data fusion methodology for automated driving. Sensors, 16: 1668. 627

Crossref

Google Scholar

[20]

N. Enayati, E. De Momi, and G. Ferrigno. February 2016. Haptics in robot-assisted surgery: challenges and benefits. IEEE Reviews In Biomedical Engineering. 629

Google Scholar

[21]

J. Fierrez, A. Morales, R. Vera-Rodriguez, and D. Camacho. November 2018. Multiple classifiers in biometrics. Part 1: Fundamentals and review. Information Fusion 44. 637

Google Scholar

[22]

Food and Drug Administration. 2019. Implanted brain-computer interface (BCI) devices for patients with paralysis or amputation---Non-clinical testing and clinical considerations. US Food and Drug Administration.

Google Scholar

[23]

P. Fosse. November 2019. Deep dive into Tesla's autopilot & self-driving architecture vs. Lidar-based systems. Clean Technica. https://cleantechnica.com/2018/11/04/deep-dive-into-teslas-autopilot-self-driving-architecture-vs-lidar-based-systems/ 627

Google Scholar

[24]

H. Franco, J. Zheng, J. Butzberger, F. Cesari M. Frandsen, J. Arnold, V. R. R. Gadde, A. Stolcke, and V. Abrashy. March 2002. DynaSpeak: SRI's scalable speech recognizer for embedded and mobile systems. HLT '02 Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Human Language Technology Research. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. San Francisco CA. 623

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[25]

T. L. Frey, C. Aguilar, K. Engebretson, D. Faulk, and L. G. Lenning. 2018. F-35 information fusion. 2018 Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference. Atlanta, GA. 623

Google Scholar

[26]

T. Gulrez. 2014. Role of Haptic Interfaces in Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery. International Journal of Swarm Intelligence and Evolutionary Computing, 3(2). 629

Crossref

Google Scholar

[27]

R. Haenni. July 2004. Shedding new light on Zadeh's criticism of Dempster's rule of combination. 7th International Conference on Information Fusion, Stockholm, Sweden. 624, 767

Google Scholar

[28]

M. Johnston. 2009. Building multimodal applications with EMMA. International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces. Cambridge, MA. 640

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[29]

G. Jones, N. Berthouze, R. Bielski, and S. Julier. 2010. Towards a situated, multimodal interface for multiple UAV control. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 1739--1744.

Google Scholar

[30]

S. J. Julier and J. K. Uhlmann. 2004. Unscented filtering and nonlinear estimation. In Proceedings of the IEEE, 92(3): 401--422. 625, 626, 777

Crossref

Google Scholar

[31]

E. Kaiser, A. Olwal, D. McGee, H. Benko, A. Corradini, X. Li, P. Cohen, and S. Feiner. 2003. Mutual disambiguation of 3D multimodal interaction in augmented and virtual reality. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces, pp. 12--19. ACM Press. 645

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[32]

R. E. Kalman. 1960. A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems. Journal of Basic Engineering, 82: 35. 625, 777

Google Scholar

[33]

S. Kane, K. McGurgan, M. Voshell, C. Monnier, S. German, and A. Ost. 2017. A multimodal interface for natural operator teaming with autonomous robots (MINOTAUR). In J. Chen editor, Advances in Human Factors in Robots and Unmanned Systems, pp. 99--108. Springer.

Google Scholar

[34]

R. Kasper and S. Schmidt. September 2008. Sensor-data-fusion for an autonomous vehicle using a Kalman-filter. 6th International Symposium on Intelligent Systems and Informatics, pp. 26--27. Subotica, Serbia.

Google Scholar

[35]

J. Kittler, M. Hatef, R. P. W. Duin, and J. Matas. 1998. On combining classifiers. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 20(3): 226--239. 636

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[36]

J. Kocic, N. Jovičic, and V. Drndarevic. November 2018. Sensors and sensor fusion in autonomous vehicles. 6th Telecommunications Forum TELFOR.

Google Scholar

[37]

K. Laenen, S. Zoghbi, and M.-F. Moens. 2018. Web search of fashion items with multimodal querying. In Proceedings Of the 18th International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pp. 342--350. ACM Press. 644

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[38]

M. A. Lebedev and M. A. L. Nicolelis. 2017. Brain-machine interfaces: From basic science to neuroprostheses and neurorehabilitation. Physiological Reviews, 97(2): 767--837. American Physiological Society. 631

Crossref

Google Scholar

[39]

G. Lemons, K. Carrington, T. Frey, and J. Ledyard. June 2018. F-35 mission systems design, development and verification. AIAA AVIATION Forum, 2018 Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference, pp. 25--29. Atlanta, GA. 623

Google Scholar

[40]

T. S. Lendvay, B. Hannaford, and R. M Satava. 2013. Future of robotic surgery. The Cancer Journal 19(2: 109--119. 628

Google Scholar

[41]

M. Liang, B. Yang, S. Wang, and R. Urtasun. 2018. Deep continuous fusion for multi-densor 3D object detection. Proceedings of European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV). 626

Google Scholar

[42]

D. A. Maerz, L. N. Beck, A. J. Sim, and D. M. Gainsburg. 2017. Complications of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery distant from the surgical site. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 118(4): 492--503. 628

Crossref

Google Scholar

[43]

T. Matsumoto, H. Matsumoto, K. Yamada, and S. Hoshino. 2002. Impact of artificial "Gummy" fingers on fingerprint systems. Proceedings of SPIE Vol. #4677, Optical Security and Counterfeit Deterrence Techniques. 637

Google Scholar

[44]

I. Maza, F. Caballero, R. Molina, N. Pena, and A. Ollero. 2010. Multimodal interface technologies for UAV ground control stations: A comparative analysis. Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems, 57(1--4): 371--391.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[45]

C. McCool, S. Marcel, A. Hadid, M. Pietikäinen, P. Matejka, J. Cernocky, N. Poh, J. Kittler, A. Larcher, C. Levy, D. Matrouf, J.-F. Bonastre, P. Tresadern, and T. Cootes. 2012. Bi-modal person recognition on a mobile phone: using mobile phone data. IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo Workshops (ICMEW), pp. 635--640. 637

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[46]

G. Meccariello, F. Faedi, S. AlGhamdi, F. Montevecchi, E. Firinu, C. Zanotti, D. Cavaliere, R. Gunelli, M. Taurchini, A. Amadori, and C. Vicini. 2016. An experimental study about haptic feedback in robotic surgery: may visual feedback substitute tactile feedback? Journal of Robotic Surgery, 10(1): 57--61. 628

Crossref

Google Scholar

[47]

A. Melamed, D. J. Margul, L. Chen, N. L. Keating, M. G. Del Carmen, J. Yang, B. L. Seagle, A. Alexander, E. L. Barber, L. W. Rice, J. D. Wright, M. Kocherginsky, S. Shahabi, and J. A. Rauh-Hain. 2018. Survival after Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. 15,379(20): 1905--1914. Epub. 629

Google Scholar

[48]

R. Mola. 2017. Super Helmet: F-35 pilots get X-ray vision and other magic powers. Air and Space Magazine, September, 2017. https://www.airspacemag.com/military-aviation/super-helmet-180964342/. 623

Google Scholar

[49]

C. Monnier. May 2017. Developing a multimodal ugv robot control interface. Aerospace and Defense Technology.

Google Scholar

[50]

R. Murphy. 1998. Dempster-Shafer theory for sensor fusion in autonomous mobile robots. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 14(2): 197--206. 624, 767

Google Scholar

[51]

A. M. Okamura. 2009. Haptic feedback in robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery. Current Opinions in Urology, 19(1): 102--107. 629

Crossref

Google Scholar

[52]

C. Pacchierotti, L. Meli, F. Chinello, M. Malvezzi, and D. Prattichizzo. 2015. Cutaneous haptic feedback to ensure the stability of robotic teleoperation systems. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 34(14): 1773--1787. 628

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[53]

D. Pfeiffer and U. Franke. 2010. Efficient representation of traffic scenes by means of dynamic stixels. IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), pp. 217--224. 625, 626, 777

Google Scholar

[54]

S. Place, D. Blanch-Hartigan, C. Rubin, C. Gorrostieta, C. Mead, J. Kane, B. P. Marx, J. Feast, T. Deckersbach, A. Pentland, A. Nierenberg, and A. Azarbayejani. 2017. Behavioral indicators on a mobile sensing platform predict clinically validated psychiatric symptoms of mood and anxiety disorders. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(3): e75. Published online 2017 Mar 16. 651

Crossref

Google Scholar

[55]

A. Ross and A. K. Jain. 2007. Fusion techniques in multibiometric systems. In R. I. Hammoud, B. R. Abidi, M. A. Abidi, editors, Face Biometrics for Personal Identification. Signals and Communication Technology. Springer, Berlin. 636

Google Scholar

[56]

A. Ross, K. Nandakumar, and A. Jain. 2006. Handbook of Multibiometrics. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg. 636

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[57]

A. Ross and N. Poh. 2009. Multibiometric systems: overview, case studies, and open issues. In M. Tistarelli, S. Z. Li, R. Chellappa, editors, Handbook of Remote Biometrics for Surveillance and Security, pp. 273--292. Springer. 636, 637

Google Scholar

[58]

J. P Ruurda, IAMJ Broeders, B. Pulles, F. M. Kappelhof, and C. Van der Werken. 2004. Manual robot assisted endoscopic suturing: time-action analysis in an experimental model. Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, 18(8): 1249--1252. 628

Crossref

Google Scholar

[59]

U. R. Sanchez and J. Kittler. 2006. Fusion of talking face biometric modalities for personal identity verification. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, Volume 5, V-V. 636, 637

Google Scholar

[60]

B. Schoettle. 2017. Sensor Fusion: A comparison of sensing capabilities of human drivers and highly automated vehicles. Report SWOT-2017-12. University of Michigan, Sustainable Worldwide Transportation. 626, 627

Google Scholar

[61]

K. Sentz and S. Ferson. April 2002. Combination of Evidence in Dempster-Shafer Theory. Sandia Report Sand2002-0835. 624, 767

Google Scholar

[62]

S. Song, Z. Xiang, and J. Liu. 2015. Object tracking with 3d lidar via multi-task sparse learning. IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation (ICMA), pp. 2603--2608. 626

Google Scholar

[63]

J. Stewart. 2019. Why Tesla's Autopilot Can't See a Stopped Firetruck, Wired, August 27, 2018. https://www.wired.com/story/tesla-autopilot-why-crash-radar/ 627

Google Scholar

[64]

A. Tangel and A. Pasztor. March 2019. Boeing to Make Key Change in 737 MAX Cockpit Software. Wall Street Journal. 623

Google Scholar

[65]

S. Tulyakov, S. Jaeger, V. Govindaraju, and D. Doermann. 2008. Review of classifier combination methods. In S. Marinai and H. Fujisawa, editors, Machine Learning in Document Analysis and Recognition, pp. 361--386. 637

Google Scholar

[66]

K. Uludaǧ and A. Roebroeck. November 2014. General overview on the merits of multimodal neuroimaging data fusion. NeuroImage Vol. 102, Part 1, pp. 3--10. 621

Crossref

Google Scholar

[67]

US FDA. February 2019. Implanted Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) devices for patients with paralysis or amputation---non-clinical testing and clinical considerations draft guidance for industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff. United States Food and Drug Administration. https://www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/UCM631786.pdf 631

Google Scholar

[68]

O. A. J. Van der Meijden, and M. P. Schijven. 2009. The value of haptic feedback in conventional and robot-assisted minimal invasive surgery and virtual reality training: a current review. Surgical Endoscopy, pp. 1180--1190. 628

Google Scholar

[69]

N. Vogler, S. Heuke, T. W. Bocklitz, M. Schmitt, and J. Popp. July 2015. Multimodal Imaging Spectroscopy of Tissue. Annual Review of Analytical Chemistry, 8: 359--387. 621

Crossref

Google Scholar

[70]

W. Wahlster, E. Andre, B. Bandyopadhyay, W. Graf, and T. Rist. 1991. WIP: The coordinated generation of multimodal presentations from a common representation. In O. Stock., J. Slack, and A. Ortony, editors, Computational Theories of Communication and their Application, Springer, Berlin. 640

Google Scholar

[71]

W. Wahlster, editor. 2006. SmartKom: Fooundations of Multimodal Dialogue Systems. Springer Berlin. 640

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[72]

T. Wang, B. Pan, Y. Fu, S. Wang, and Y. Ai. 2017. Design of a new haptic device and experiments in minimally invasive surgical robot. Innovation in Biomedical Science and Engineering, pp, 240--250. Journal Computer Assisted Surgery Vol. 22, 2017. Taylor and Francis Online Journal. 629

Google Scholar

[73]

B. Weber and S. Schneider. 2014. The effects of force feedback on surgical task performance: a meta-analytical integration. In International Conference on Human Haptic Sensing and Touch Enabled Computer Applications, 150--157. Springer. 628

Google Scholar

[74]

C. R. Wottawa, B. Genovese, B. N. Nowroozi, S. D. Hart, J. W. Bisley, W. S. Grundfest, and E. P. Dutson. 2016. Evaluating tactile feedback in robotic surgery for potential clinical application using an animal model. Surgical Endoscopy, 30(8): 3198--3209. 628

Crossref

Google Scholar

[75]

M. Wu and J. Shu. 2018. Multimodal molecular imaging: current status and future directions, Contrast Media & Molecular Imaging. 621

Google Scholar

[76]

L. A. Zadeh. 1986. A simple view of the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence and its implication for the rule of combination. AI Magazine, 85--90. 624, 767

Digital Library

Google Scholar

Cited By

View all

Shubham KVenkatesan LJayagopi DTumuluri R(2022)Multimodal Embodied Conversational Agents: A discussion of architectures, frameworks and modules for commercial applications2022 IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Virtual Reality (AIVR)10.1109/AIVR56993.2022.00013(36-45)Online publication date: Dec-2022
https://doi.org/10.1109/AIVR56993.2022.00013
Feld MNeβelrath RSchwartz T(2019)Software platforms and toolkits for building multimodal systems and applicationsThe Handbook of Multimodal-Multisensor Interfaces10.1145/3233795.3233801(145-190)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3233795.3233801

Recommendations

Multimodal interaction systems: information and time features

Multimodal interaction systems combine visual information (involving images, text, sketches and so on) with voice, gestures and other modalities to provide flexible and powerful dialogue approaches, enabling users to choose one or more of the multiple ...
Conversational Grounding in Multimodal Dialog Systems
ICMI '23: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Multimodal Interaction

The process of “conversational grounding” is an interactive process that has been studied extensively in cognitive science, whereby participants in a conversation check to make sure their interlocutors understand what is being referred to. This ...
Attention and Engagement Aware Multimodal Conversational Systems
ICMI '15: Proceedings of the 2015 ACM on International Conference on Multimodal Interaction

Despite their ability to complete certain tasks, dialog systems still suffer from poor adaptation to users' engagement and attention. We observe human behaviors in different conversational settings to understand human communication dynamics and then ...

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

The Handbook of Multimodal-Multisensor Interfaces: Language Processing, Software, Commercialization, and Emerging Directions

July 2019

813 pages

ISBN:9781970001754

DOI:10.1145/3233795

Editors:
Sharon Oviatt
Monash University
,
Björn Schuller
Imperial College London and University of Augsburg
,
Philip R. Cohen
Monash University
,
Daniel Sonntag
German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI)
,
Gerasimos Potamianos
University of Thessaly
,
Antonio Krüger
Saarland University and German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI)

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery and Morgan & Claypool

Publication History

Published: 01 July 2019

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Qualifiers

Research-article

Appears in

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

2
Total Citations
View Citations
144
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)13
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

Reflects downloads up to 15 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

Shubham KVenkatesan LJayagopi DTumuluri R(2022)Multimodal Embodied Conversational Agents: A discussion of architectures, frameworks and modules for commercial applications2022 IEEE International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Virtual Reality (AIVR)10.1109/AIVR56993.2022.00013(36-45)Online publication date: Dec-2022
https://doi.org/10.1109/AIVR56993.2022.00013
Feld MNeβelrath RSchwartz T(2019)Software platforms and toolkits for building multimodal systems and applicationsThe Handbook of Multimodal-Multisensor Interfaces10.1145/3233795.3233801(145-190)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3233795.3233801

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Cited By

Recommendations

Multimodal interaction systems: information and time features

Conversational Grounding in Multimodal Dialog Systems

Attention and Engagement Aware Multimodal Conversational Systems