skip to main content
10.1145/3173574.3173695acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Public Access

Analogy Mining for Specific Design Needs

Published: 19 April 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Finding analogical inspirations in distant domains is a powerful way of solving problems. However, as the number of inspirations that could be matched and the dimensions on which that matching could occur grow, it becomes challenging for designers to find inspirations relevant to their needs. Furthermore, designers are often interested in exploring specific aspects of a product-- for example, one designer might be interested in improving the brewing capability of an outdoor coffee maker, while another might wish to optimize for portability. In this paper we introduce a novel system for targeting analogical search for specific needs. Specifically, we contribute an analogical search engine for expressing and abstracting specific design needs that returns more distant yet relevant inspirations than alternate approaches.

Supplementary Material

suppl.mov (pn1826-file5.mp4)
Supplemental video
suppl.mov (pn1826.mp4)
Supplemental video

References

[1]
Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum. 2017. Inventing a Flying Machine: The Breakthrough Concept. https://airandspace.si.edu/exhibitions/wright-% brothers/online/fly/1899/breakthrough.cfm. (2017). Accessed: 2017-09--15.
[2]
Dzmitry Bahdanau, Kyunghyun Cho, and Yoshua Bengio. 2014. Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.0473 (2014).
[3]
Edward Loper Bird, Steven and Ewan Klein. 2009. Natural Language Processing with Python. O'Reilly Media Inc. (2009).
[4]
David M. Blei, Andrew Y. Ng, Michael I. Jordan, and John Lafferty. 2003. Latent Dirichlet Allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research (2003), 993--1022.
[5]
Joel Chan, Steven P. Dow, and Christian D. Schunn. 2015. Do The Best Design Ideas (Really) Come From Conceptually Distant Sources Of Inspiration? Design Studies 36 (2015), 31--58.
[6]
Joel Chan, Katherine Fu, Christian. D. Schunn, Jonathan Cagan, Kristin L. Wood, and Kenneth Kotovsky. 2011. On the benefits and pitfalls of analogies for innovative design: Ideation performance based on analogical distance, commonness, and modality of examples. Journal of Mechanical Design 133 (2011), 081004.
[7]
Scott Deerwester, Susan T. Dumais, Geroge W. Furnas, and Thomas K. Landauer. 1990. Indexing by Latent Semantic Analysis. JASIST 41, 6 (1990), 1990.
[8]
Brian Falkenhainer, Kenneth D Forbus, and Dedre Gentner. 1989. The structure-mapping engine: Algorithm and examples. Artificial intelligence 41, 1 (1989), 1--63.
[9]
Katherine Fu, Joel Chan, Jonathan Cagan, Kenneth Kotovsky, Christian Schunn, and Kristin Wood. 2013. The Meaning of Near and Far: The Impact of Structuring Design Databases and the Effect of Distance of Analogy on Design Output. JMD 135, 2 (2013), 021007.
[10]
Dedre Gentner. 1983. Structure-Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy*. Cognitive science 7, 2 (1983), 155--170.
[11]
Dedre Gentner. 1989. The mechanisms of analogical learning. In Similarity and Analogical Reasoning, Stella Vosniadou and Andrew Ortony (Eds.). Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, USA, 197--241. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=107328.107335
[12]
Dedre Gentner and Arthur B Markman. 1997. Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. American psychologist 52, 1 (1997), 45.
[13]
Milene Goncalves, Carlos Cardoso, and Petra Badke-Schaub. 2013. Inspiration peak: exploring the semantic distance between design problem and textual inspirational stimuli. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation 1, 4 (2013), 215--232.
[14]
Margaret Guroff and Margaret Guroff. 2016. The Untold Story Of How Bicycle Design Led To The Invention Of The Airplane. (July 2016). https://www.fastcodesign. com/3061592/the-untold-story-of-how-bicycle-
[15]
design-led-to-the-invention-of-the-airplane
[16]
Tom Hope, Joel Chan, Aniket Kittur, and Dafna Shahaf. 2017. Accelerating Innovation Through Analogy Mining. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, 235--243.
[17]
Douglas B. Lenat. 1995. CYC: a large-scale investment in knowledge infrastructure. In Communications of the ACM Volume 38 Issue 11, Nov. 1995. ACM, 33--38.
[18]
Douglas B. Lenat, V. Guha, R., K. Pittman, D. Pratt, and M. Shepherd. 1990. CYC: towards programs with common sense. In Communications of the ACM Volume 33(8) Issue 11, Aug. 1990. ACM, 30--49.
[19]
J. S. Linsey, A. B. Markman, and K. L. Wood. 2012. Design by Analogy: A Study of the WordTree Method for Problem Re-Representation. Journal of Mechanical Design 134, 4 (April 2012), 041009--041009.
[20]
Johnson Laird Phillip M. 2005. Flying bicycles: How the Wright brothers invented the airplane. Mind & Society 4, 1 (2005), 27--48.
[21]
Tomas Mikolov, Kai Chen, Greg Corrado, and Jeffrey Dean. 2013. Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Space. arXiv:1301.3781 {cs} (Jan. 2013). http://arxiv.org/abs/1301.3781 arXiv: 1301.3781.
[22]
George A Miller. 1995. WordNet: a lexical database for English. Commun. ACM 38, 11 (1995), 39--41.
[23]
Library of Congress. 2017. History of Edison Motion Pictures. https://www.loc.gov/collections/ edison-company-motion-pictures-and-sound-recordings/ articles-and-essays/ history-of-edison-motion-pictures/. (2017). Accessed: 2017-09--15.
[24]
Jeffrey Pennington, Richard Socher, and Christopher D Manning. 2014. Glove: Global Vectors for Word Representation. In EMNLP, Vol. 14. 1532--43.
[25]
L. E. Richland, O. Zur, and K. J. Holyoak. 2007. Cognitive supports for analogies in the mathematics classroom. Science 316, 5828 (2007), 1128--1129.
[26]
Robert Speer and Catherine Havasi. 2012. Representing General Relational Knowledge in ConceptNet 5. LREC. http://ai2-s2-pdfs.s3.amazonaws.com
[27]
Vibeke Venema. 2013. The car mechanic who uncorked a childbirth revolution. BBC News (Dec. 2013). http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-25137800
[28]
Lixiu Yu, Aniket Kittur, and Robert E Kraut. 2014a. Searching for analogical ideas with crowds. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 1225--1234.
[29]
L Yu, B Kraut, and A Kittur. 2014b. Distributed analogical idea generation: innovating with crowds. In CHI'14.
[30]
Lixiu Yu, Robert E. Kraut, and Aniket Kittur. 2016. Distributed Analogical Idea Generation with Multiple Constraints. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1236--1245.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Analogy Mining for Specific Design Needs

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CHI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 2018
    8489 pages
    ISBN:9781450356206
    DOI:10.1145/3173574
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 19 April 2018

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. abstraction
    2. computational analogy
    3. creativity
    4. focus
    5. innovation
    6. inspiration
    7. product dimensions
    8. text embedding

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Funding Sources

    • Bosch
    • Google
    • Carnegie Mellon's Web2020 initiative
    • ISF
    • HUJI Cyber Security Research Center in conjunction with the Israel National Cyber Bureau in the Prime Minister's Office
    • NSF
    • Alon

    Conference

    CHI '18
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    CHI '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 666 of 2,590 submissions, 26%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

    Upcoming Conference

    CHI 2025
    ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 26 - May 1, 2025
    Yokohama , Japan

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)177
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)16
    Reflects downloads up to 30 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Login options

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media