skip to main content
10.1145/3148330.3148346acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesgroupConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Collaboration Success Factors in an Online Music Community

Published: 07 January 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Online communities have been able to develop large, open-source software (OSS) projects like Linux and Firefox throughout the successful collaborations carried out by their members over the Internet. However, online communities also involve creative arts domains such as animation, video games, and music. Despite their growing popularity, the factors that lead to successful collaborations in these communities are not entirely understood.
In this paper, we present a study on creative collaboration in a music community where authors write songs together by "overdubbing", that is, by mixing a new track with an existing audio recording. We analyzed the relationship between song- and author-related measures and the likelihood of a song being overdubbed. We found that recent songs, as well as songs with many reactions, are more likely to be overdubbed; authors with a high status in the community and a recognizable identity write songs that the community tends to build upon.

References

[1]
O. Baysal, R. Holmes, and M.W. Godfrey. 2012. Mining usage data and development artifacts. In IEEE Int'l Working Conf. on Mining Software Repositories (MSR '12), 98--107.
[2]
Y. Benkler. 2007. The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, USA.
[3]
M. Burke and B. Settles. 2011. Plugged in to the community. In Proc. of the 5th Int'l Conf. on Communities and Technologies (C&T '11).
[4]
F. Calefato, F. Lanubile, M.C. Marasciulo, and N. Novielli. 2015. Mining successful answers in stack overflow. In IEEE Int'l Working Conf. on Mining Software Repositories, 430--433.
[5]
G. Cheliotis, N. Hu, J. Yew, and J. Huang. 2014. The Antecedents of Remix. In Proc. of the 17th ACM Conf. on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '14), 1011--1022.
[6]
L. Dabbish, C. Stuart, J. Tsay, and J. Herbsleb. 2012. Social Coding in GitHub: Transparency and Collaboration in an Open Software Repository. Proc. of the ACM 2012 Conf. on Computer Supported Cooperative Work: 1277--128
[7]
N. Ducheneaut. 2005. Socialization in an open source software community: A socio-technical analysis. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: CSCW: An Int'l Journal 14, 4: 323--368.
[8]
G. Gousios, M. Pinzger, and A. van Deursen. 2014. An exploratory study of the pull-based software development model. In Proc. of the 36th Int'l Conf. on Software Engineering - ICSE 2014.
[9]
G. Gousios, M. Pinzger, and A. van Deursen. 2014. An Exploratory Study of the Pull-based Software Development Model. In Proc. of the 36th Int'l Conf. on Software Engineering, 345--355.
[10]
G. Gousios, M.-A. Storey, and A. Bacchelli. 2016. Work practices and challenges in pull-based development: The contributor's perspective. In Proc. of the 38th Int'l Conf. on Software Engineering - ICSE '16.
[11]
1G. Gousios, M.-A. Storey, and A. Bacchelli. 2016. Work Practices and Challenges in Pull-Based Development: The Contributor's Perspective. In Proc. of the 38th Int'l Conf. on Software Engineering - ICSE '16, 285--296.
[12]
G. Gousios, A. Zaidman, M.-A. Storey, and A. van Deursen. 2015. Work Practices and Challenges in Pull-Based Development: The Integrator's Perspective. In 2015 IEEE/ACM 37th IEEE Int'l Conf. on Software Engineering.
[13]
B.M. Hill and A. Monroy-Hernández. 2012. The Remixing Dilemma. American Behavioral Scientist 57, 5: 643--663.
[14]
K. Luther and A. Bruckman. 2008. Leadership and success factors in online creative collaboration. In IEEE Potentials (CSCW '08), 27--32.
[15]
K. Luther, K. Caine, K. Ziegler, and A. Bruckman. 2010. Why it works (when it works). In Proc. of the 16th ACM Int'l Conf. on Supporting group work (GROUP '10).
[16]
J. Marlow, L. Dabbish, and J. Herbsleb. 2013. Impression Formation in Online Peer Production?: Activity Traces and Personal Profiles in GitHub. 16th ACM Conf. on Computer Supported Cooperative Work: 117--128.
[17]
S. Müller, J.L. Scealy, and A.H. Welsh. 2013. Model Selection in Linear Mixed Models. Statistical Science 28, 2: 135--167.
[18]
E. Navas. 2012. Remix Theory: The Aesthetics of Sampling.
[19]
B. Settles and S. Dow. 2013. Let's get together. In Proc. of the SIGCHI Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '13 (CHI '13), 2009.
[20]
M.A. Stanko. 2016. Toward a Theory of Remixing in Online Innovation Communities. Information Systems Research 27, 4: 773--791.
[21]
2J. Tsay, L. Dabbish, and J. Herbsleb. 2014. Influence of social and technical factors for evaluating contribution in GitHub. In 36th Int'l Conf. on Software Engineering, 356--366.
[22]
2P. Weißgerber, D. Neu, and S. Diehl. 2008. Small patches get in! In Proc. of the 2008 Int'l workshop on Mining software repositories (MSR '08), 67.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. Collaboration Success Factors in an Online Music Community

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    GROUP '18: Proceedings of the 2018 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work
    January 2018
    422 pages
    ISBN:9781450355629
    DOI:10.1145/3148330
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 07 January 2018

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. creative collaboration
    2. music composition
    3. online community
    4. open source
    5. overdub
    6. remix
    7. reuse
    8. social computing

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    GROUP '18
    Sponsor:
    GROUP '18: 2018 ACM Conference on Supporting Groupwork
    January 7 - 10, 2018
    Florida, Sanibel Island, USA

    Acceptance Rates

    GROUP '18 Paper Acceptance Rate 22 of 94 submissions, 23%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 125 of 405 submissions, 31%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)35
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 04 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media