skip to main content
research-article

Hacking with NPOs: Collaborative Analytics and Broker Roles in Civic Data Hackathons

Published: 06 December 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Recently Nonprofit organizations (NPOs) are adopting more and more data-driven approaches to their work, yet NPOs often lack appropriate tools and expertise in such data related works. To compensate, many NPOs are using a new form of collaboration, civic data hackathons, to leverage on external volunteers' data expertise. In this paper, we sought to understand how civic data hackathons could generate impactful data analytics for NPOs' data-driven work, and how to support collaborative data analytics during hackathons. We collected various types of data (observations, surveys, and interviews) from two civic data hackathons with 9 NPOs and over 300 data volunteers in a Midwestern city in the U.S. Our results describe the collaboration activities and the types of actionable collaborative analytics outputs generated from these activities. We also identify a unique social group (i.e., client teams), who help with preparing and coordinating the event, perform brokering activities to support the collaborative analytics through the civic data hackathons. This broker role is vital for the success of the collaboration between domain experts and data experts. Our findings contribute to the CSCW research on the collaborative work of interdisciplinary hackathons, and to a broader understanding of civic data collaborations.

References

[1]
Jennifer Alexander, Jeffrey L. Brudney, Kaifeng Yang, Kelly Leroux and Nathaniel S Wright. 2010. Does performance measurement improve strategic decision making? Findings from a national survey of nonprofit social service agencies. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 39, 4: 571--587.
[2]
Chris Bopp, Ellie Harmon and Amy Voida. 2017. Disempowered by data: nonprofits, social enterprises, and the consequences of data-driven work. In Proceedings of CHI '17, 3608--3619.
[3]
John M. Carroll, Mary Beth Rosson, Gregorio Convertino and Craig H. Ganoe. 2006. Awareness and teamwork in computer-supported collaborations. Interacting with Computers 18, 1: 21--46.
[4]
Joohee Choi. 2017. Characteristics of collaboration in the emerging practice of open data analysis. In Proceedings of CSCW '17, 835--846.
[5]
Gregorio Convertino, Helena M Mentis, Aleksandra Slavkovic, Mary Beth Rosson and John M Carroll. 2011. Supporting common ground and awareness in emergency management planning: A design research project. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 18, 4: 22.
[6]
Carl Disalvo, Thomas Lodato, Jonathan Lukens and Tanyoung Kim. 2014. Making public things: how HCI design can express matters of concern. In Proceedings of CHI '14, 2397--2406.
[7]
Paul Dourish and Victoria Bellotti. 1992. Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces. In Proceedings of CSCW '92, 107--114.
[8]
Sheena Erete, Emily Ryou, Geoff Smith, Khristina Fassett and Sarah Duda. 2016. Storytelling with data: examining the use of data by non-profit organizations. In Proceedings of CSCW '16, 1273--1283.
[9]
Michael B. Gurstein. 2011. Open data: Empowering the empowered or effective data use for everyone? First Monday 16, 2.
[10]
Jeffrey Heer and Maneesh Agrawala. 2006. Software design patterns for information visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 12, 5.
[11]
Jeffrey Heer and Maneesh Agrawala. 2007. Design considerations for collaborative visual analytics. In Proceedings of VAST IEEE Symposium on Visual Analytics Science and Technology, 171--178.
[12]
Daniel Hellmann, Carleen Maitland and Andrea Tapia. 2016. Collaborative analytics and brokering in digital humanitarian response. In Proceedings of CSCW '16, 1284--1294.
[13]
Youyang Hou and Cliff Lampe. 2015. Social media effectiveness for public engagement: example of small nonprofits. In Proceedings of CHI '15, 3107--3116.
[14]
Lilly Irani. 2015. Hackathons and the making of entrepreneurial citizenship. Science, Technology & Human Values 40, 5: 799--824.
[15]
Peter Johnson and Pamela Robinson. 2014. Civic hackathons: innovation, procurement, or civic engagement? Review of Policy Research 31, 4: 349--357.
[16]
Erik Lakomaa and Jan Kallberg. 2013. Open data as a foundation for innovation: The enabling effect of free public sector information for entrepreneurs. IEEE Access 1, 558--563.
[17]
Michael Lenczner and Susan Phillips. 2012. From stories to evidence: how mining data can promote innovation in the nonprofit sector. Technology Innovation Management Review 2, 7: 10.
[18]
Thomas James Lodato and Carl Disalvo. 2016. Issue-oriented hackathons as material participation. New Media & Society 18, 4: 539 - 557.
[19]
Nan L. Maxwell, Dana Rotz and Christina Garcia. 2016. Data and decision making: Same organization, different perceptions; different organizations, different perceptions. American Journal of Evaluation 37, 4: 463--485.
[20]
David W. Mcdonald and Mark S. Ackerman. 1998. Just talk to me: A field study of expertise location. In Proceedings of CSCW '98, 1--11.
[21]
David W. Mcdonald and Mark S. Ackerman. 2000. Expertise recommender: a flexible recommendation system and architecture. In Proceedings of CSCW '00, 231--240.
[22]
Cecelia Merkel, Umer Farooq, Lu Xiao, Craig Ganoe, Mary Beth Rosson and John M. Carroll. 2007. Managing technology use and learning in nonprofit community organizations: Methodological challenges and opportunities. In Proceedings of CHIMIT '07, 8.
[23]
Jonathan Morgan, Wikimedia Foundation, Dharma Dailey and Benjamin Mako Hill. 2017. Hacking and making at time-bounded events: Current trends and next steps in research and event Design. In Proceedings of CSCW '17 Companion, 363--370.
[24]
Andreas Paepcke. 1996. Information needs in technical work settings and their implications for the design of computer tools. CSCW 5, 1: 63--92.
[25]
S. D. Pawlowski, Dan Robey and A. Raven. 2000. Supporting shared information systems: Boundary objects, communities, and brokering. Conference on Information Systems 329--338.
[26]
Suzanne D. Pawlowski, Daniel Robey and Daniel Robey. 2004. Bridging user organizations: Knowledge brokering and the work of information technology professionals. MIS Quarterly 28, 4: 645--672.
[27]
Matthew Richardson and Ryen W White. 2011. Supporting synchronous social Q&A throughout the question lifecycle. In Proceedings of WWW '11, 755--764.
[28]
Stephanie B. Steinhardt and Steven J. Jackson. 2015. Anticipation work: Cultivating vision in collective practice. In Proceedings of CSCW '15, 443--453.
[29]
Erik H. Trainer, Arun Kalyanasundaram, Chalalai Chaihirunkarn and James D. Herbsleb. 2016. How to hackathon: Socio-technical tradeoffs in brief, intensive collocation. In Proceedings of CSCW '16, 1118--1130.
[30]
Amy Voida, Ellie Harmon and Ban Al-Ani. 2011. Homebrew databases: Complexities of everyday information management in nonprofit organizations. In Proceedings of CHI '11, 915--924.
[31]
Dakuo Wang, Youyang Hou, Lin Luo and Yingxin Pan. 2016. Answerer engagement in an enterprise social question & answering system. In Proceedings of IConference '16.
[32]
Matthew Weinstein. 2006. TAMS analyzer: Anthropology as cultural critique in a digital age. Social Science Computer Review 24, 1: 68--77.
[33]
Etienne Wenger. 2003. Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization 7, 2: 76--99.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 1, Issue CSCW
November 2017
2095 pages
EISSN:2573-0142
DOI:10.1145/3171581
Issue’s Table of Contents
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 06 December 2017
Published in PACMHCI Volume 1, Issue CSCW

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. brokering
  2. collaborative analytics
  3. data scientist
  4. hackathons
  5. nonprofit organization
  6. open data

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)71
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
Reflects downloads up to 07 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

Full Access

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media