skip to main content
10.1145/3057148.3057152acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesswmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Building recommender systems for scholarly information

Published: 10 February 2017 Publication History

Abstract

The depth and breadth of research now being published is overwhelming for an individual researcher to keep track of let alone consume. Recommender systems have been developed to make it easier for researchers to discover relevant content. However, these have predominately taken the form of item-to-item recommendations using citation network features or text similarity features.
This paper details how the Mendeley Suggest recommender system has been designed and developed. We show how implicit user feedback (based on activity data from the reference manager) and collaborative filtering (CF) are used to generate the recommendations for Mendeley Suggest. Because collaborative filtering suffers from the cold start problem (the inability to serve recommendations to new users), we developed additional recommendation methods based on user-defined attributes, such as discipline and research interests.
Our off-line evaluation shows that where possible, recommendations based on collaborative filtering perform best, followed by recommendations based on recent activity. However, for cold users (for whom collaborative filtering was not possible) recommendations based on discipline performed best. Additionally, when we segmented users by career stages, we found that among senior academics, content-based recommendations from recent activity had comparable performance to collaborative filtering. This justifies our approach of developing a variety of recommendation methods, in order to serve a range of users across the academic spectrum.

References

[1]
J Beel, B Gipp, S Langer, and C Breitinger. 2016. Research-paper recommender systems: a literature survey. International Journal on Digital... 17, 4 (2016), 305--338.
[2]
A Bhowmick, U Prasad, and S Kottur. Movie Recommendation based on Collaborative Topic Modeling. satwikkottur.github.io (????). https://satwikkottur.github.io/reports/F14-ML-Report.pdf
[3]
Ludvig Bohlin, Daniel Edler, Andrea Lancichinetti, and Martin Rosvall. 2014. Community Detection and Visualization of Networks with the Map Equation Framework. In Measuring Scholarly Impact. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 3--34.
[4]
C Gomez-Uribe. 2015. The netflix recommender system: Algorithms, business value, and innovation. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems 6, 4(Dec. 2015).
[5]
Yichen Jiang, Aixia Jia, Yansong Feng, and Dongyan Zhao. 2012. Recommending academic papers via users' reading purposes. In Proceedings of the sixth ACM conference on Recommender systems. ACM, 241--244.
[6]
Pei Lee, Laks VS Lakshmanan, Mitul Tiwari, and Sam Shah. 2014. Modeling impression discounting in large-scale recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, 1837--1846.
[7]
G Linden, B Smith, and J York. 2003. Amazon.com recommendations: item-to-item collaborative filtering. Internet Computing, IEEE 7, 1 (2003), 76--80.
[8]
Sean M McNee, Istvan Albert, Dan Cosley, Prateep Gopalkrishnan, Shyong K Lam, Al Mamunur Rashid, Joseph A Konstan, and John Riedl. 2002. On the recommending of citations for research papers. In Proceedings of the 2002 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. ACM, 116--125.
[9]
Cristiano Nascimento, Alberto HF Laender, Altigran S da Silva, and Marcos Andreé Gonçalves. 2011. A source independent framework for research paper recommendation. In Proceedings of the 11th annual international ACM/IEEE joint conference on Digital libraries. ACM, 297--306.
[10]
Badrul Sarwar, George Karypis, Joseph Konstan, and John Riedl. 2001. Item-based Collaborative Filtering Recommendation Algorithms. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on World Wide Web. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 285--295.
[11]
Chong Wang and David M Blei. 2011. Collaborative topic modeling for recommending scientific articles. ACM, New York, New York, USA.
[12]
I Wesley-Smith, R J Dandrea, and J D West. 2015. An Experimental Platform for Scholarly Article Recommendation. BIR@ ECIR 1344 (2015), 30--39. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2d83/4b627f03d540d21f4ceaae8e26d2aecc338e.pdf
[13]
Jevin D West, Michael C Jensen, Ralph J Dandrea, Gregory J Gordon, and Carl T Bergstrom. 2013. Author-level Eigenfactor metrics: Evaluating the influence of authors, institutions, and countries within the social science research network community. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64, 4 (Feb. 2013), 787--801.
[14]
J D West and I Wesley-Smith. 2016. A recommendation system based on hierarchical clustering of an article-level citation network. IEEE Transactions on Big... 2, 2 (2016), 113--123.
[15]
Chenxing Yang, Baogang Wei, Jiangqin Wu, Yin Zhang, and Liang Zhang. 2009. CARES: a ranking-oriented CADAL recommender system. In Proceedings of the 9th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries. ACM, 203--212.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
SWM '17: Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Scholarly Web Mining
February 2017
65 pages
ISBN:9781450352406
DOI:10.1145/3057148
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

In-Cooperation

  • Oak Ridge National Laboratory
  • OU: The Open University

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 10 February 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Implicit Feedback
  2. Recommender Systems
  3. Scholarly Information

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

SWM '17
SWM '17: 1st Workshop on Scholarly Web Mining
February 10, 2017
Cambridge, United Kingdom

Acceptance Rates

SWM '17 Paper Acceptance Rate 8 of 17 submissions, 47%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 8 of 17 submissions, 47%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)11
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Reflects downloads up to 27 Dec 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media