skip to main content
10.1145/3055219.3055239acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicegovConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Comprehensive Multidimensional Conceptual Model to Assess the e-Governance Service Quality at Common Service Centers in India

Published: 07 March 2017 Publication History

Abstract

E-governance is a new way of life where ITC (Information Technology and Communication) has believed to enhance the communication and services of government. It has reduced cost and time of availability and delivery of services to citizen and limited corruptions when compared to traditional way of availing government services. CSC is one of the core infrastructures under NeGP (National e-Governance Plan) in 2006 by GoI (Government of India). It envisages the socio-economic status of rural population by including them in development process and providing sustainable digital access. The main aim of CSC is to provide frontend delivery points for government (G2C), private and social sector organizations (B2C) to support for the benefit and upliftment of the rural community in remotest places. A large number of studies have been conducted by academics to measure the service quality of e-governance. But they did not come out with a comprehensive model for assessing the service quality of CSCs. The present systematic and descriptive research is undertaken with two main objectives- to review major e-governance G2C service quality models and to assess the key dimensions for developing a comprehensive multidimensional conceptual model for e-governance service quality of CSCs in India. The study found that information quality, system quality, institution-service quality, trust, usability, citizen (user) satisfaction and net benefit are key dimensions to assess the service quality of CSCs.

References

[1]
Abran, A., Khelifi, A., Suryn, W., & Seffah, A.2003. Consolidating the ISO usability models. In Proceedings of 11th international software quality management conference (April 2003), 23--25.
[2]
Abu-Shanab, E. 2014. Antecedents of trust in e-government services: an empirical test in Jordan. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 8,4,(Oct 2014) 480--499.
[3]
Agarwal, A., Shah, P., and Wadhwa,V. 2007.EGOSQ-Users' Assessment of e-governance Online-Services: quality measurement instrumentation. International Conference on E-governance,(December.2007), Hydrabad, India, 231--244.
[4]
Alawneh, A., Al-Refai, H. and Batiha, K.2013. Measuring user satisfaction from e-Government services: Lessons from Jordan. Government Information Quarterly,30,3,(Jul,2013), 277--288.
[5]
Al-Shafi, S., Weerakkody, V., Irani, Z. and Lee, H.2009.E-Government Adoption in Qatar: An Investigation of the Citizens Perspective. In Proceeding of Diffusion Interest Group In Information Technology DIGIT 2009. Paper 3. AIS Electronic Library (AISeL)
[6]
Alshehri, M., Drew, S., Alhussain, T., & Alghamdi, R. 2012. The Effects of Website Quality on Adoption of E-Government Service: An Empirical Study Applying UTAUT Model Using SEM. arXiv preprint arXiv:1211.2410.
[7]
Al-Sobhi, F., Weerakkody, V. and Al-Shafi, S. 2010.The Role of Intermediaries in Facilitating E-Government Diffusion in Saudi Arabia. European and Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems (EMCIS2010) April 12--13 2009, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
[8]
Asma A. Al-Hashmi., Suresha.2014. Development and initial Validation of a Scale to Measure the Quality of E-government System. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering (2014)4, 5, 201--209.
[9]
Axelsson, K., Melin, U., & Lindgren, I. (2013). Public e-services for agency efficiency and citizen benefit---Findings from a stakeholder centered analysis. Government Information Quarterly, 30(1), 10--22.
[10]
Bhatnagar, S. C., Singh, N. 2010. Assessing the impact of e-government: a study of projects in India. Information Technologies & International Development,6,2,(June 2010),109.
[11]
BIS 15700 standard.2005.Indian Standards Quality Management Systems-Requirements for Service, Service Quality by Public Service Organizations.ICS 03.120.10, Bureau of Indian Standards. New Delhi
[12]
Chan, F. K., Thong, J. Y., Venkatesh, V., Brown, S. A., Hu, P. J., & Tam, K. Y. 2010. Modeling citizen satisfaction with mandatory adoption of an e-government technology. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 1110, (Dec 2010) 519--549.
[13]
Chutimaskul., and Funilkul.2012.The Framework for Monitoring the Development Process and Inspection of Government Information System and Technology: A Case Study in Thailand. EGOVIS/EDEM 2012, LNCS 7452, 29--43.
[14]
Connolly, R., & Bannister, F. 2007. Trust and the taxman: a study of the Irish revenue's website service quality. Electronic Journal of e-Government, 5,2,(Nov, 2007), 127--134
[15]
Davis, Fred D. 1989. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, (September 1989), 319--340.
[16]
Debjani Bhattacharya., Umesh Gulla, M.P., Gupta.2012. E-service quality model for Indian government portals: citizens' perspective. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 25, 3(2012), 246--271.
[17]
DeLone, W.H., and McLean, E.R.1992. Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3, 1 (1992), 60--95.
[18]
Delone, W. H., & McLean, E. R.2003.The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9-30. Gronroos, C. (1984), op. cit., pp. 36--44.
[19]
DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R.2016. Information Systems Success Measurement. Foundations and Trends in Information Systems, (Aug 2016), 21, 1--116.
[20]
Grönroos, C.1984. A service quality model and its marketing implications. European Journal of marketing, 184, (April, 1984), 36--44.
[21]
Gupta, K. P., Bhaskar, P., & Singh, S. 2016. Critical Factors Influencing E-Government Adoption in India: An Investigation of the Citizens' Perspectives. Journal of Information Technology Research (JITR), 9,4,(Oct 2016), 28--44.
[22]
Hien, N. M. 2014. A study on evaluation of e-government service quality. International Journal of Social, Management, Economics and Business Engineering,8,1,(2014).
[23]
Horan,T.A.,Abhichandani,T., and Rayalu, R.2006.Assessing User Satisfaction of E-Government Services: Development and testing of quality-use satisfaction with advanced traveler information systems (ATIS), 39th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. Kauai,Hawaii
[24]
Jafari, S. M., Ali, N. A., Sambasivan, M., Said, M. F. 2011. A respecification and extension of DeLone and McLean model of IS success in the citizen-centric e-governance. In Information Reuse and Integration (IRI), (Aug, 2011), IEEE International Conference. 342--346.
[25]
Johnston, R. 1995.The determinants of service quality: satisfiers and dissatisfiers. International Journal of Service Industry Management, Vol. 8 No. 5, pp. 53--71.
[26]
Kim, M., Kim, JH., and Lennon, S.J.2006.Online service attributes available on apparel retail web sites: An ESQUAL approach. Managing Service Quality,(Jan 2006)16,1,51--77.
[27]
Layne K, Lee J.2001. Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model. Government Information Quarterly (2001 Aug 31),18,2,122--36.
[28]
Li, Y.N., Tan, K.C. and Xie, M.2002.Measuring web-based service quality. Total Quality Management,(2002)13,5, 685--700.
[29]
Lee, Y., Kim, J., Lee, I., & Kim, H. {2002}. A Cross-Cultural Study on the Value Structure of Mobile Internet Usage: Comparison between Korea and Japan. J. Electron. Commerce Res., 3,4,(2002), 227--239.
[30]
Lee, G-G. & Lin, H-F. 2005. Customer Perceptions of E-Service Quality in On-Line Shopping, International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 33,2,(Feb 2005) 161--176.
[31]
Lociacono, Eleanor, Watson, Richard T., Goodhue, Dale, L. 2002. WebQual: A measure of Web site quality, Marketing theory and application. 13,3(Feb 2002)432--8.
[32]
Mohammed Alshehri, Steve Drew, Thamer Alhussain, Rayed Alghamdi.2012. The Effects of Website Quality on Adoption of E-Government Service: An Empirical Study Applying UTAUT Model Using SEM. 23rd Australasian Conference On Information Systems, 3-5 Dec 2012, Geelong
[33]
Moon, M. J.2002. The evolution of e-government among municipalities: Rhetoric or reality?. Public Administration review.62,4(Jan 2002), 424--433.
[34]
Oliver, R. L. 1993. A conceptual model of service quality and service satisfaction: Compatible goals, different concepts. In T. A. Swartz, D. E. Bowen, & S. W. Brown (Eds.), Advances in services marketing and management. 2,(1993), 65--85.
[35]
Osama,R., H. Thair, H. Osama, A.-S. Bashar, O. Ruba, and N. Sahem. 2013. Towards developing successful e-government websites. J. Softw.Eng. Appl, 6(2013), 559, 2013.
[36]
Osman, I. H., Anouze, A. L., Irani, Z., Al-Ayoubi, B., Lee, H., Balci, A.,. & Weerakkody, V. 2014. COBRA framework to evaluate e-government services: A citizen-centric perspective. Government Information Quarterly, 3,12(April,2014), 243--256.
[37]
Papadomichelaki, X., Magoutas, B., Halaris, C., Apostolou, D., Mentzas, G. 2006. A review of quality dimensions in e-government services. EGOV 2006, LNCS 4084, 128--138,. c Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
[38]
Papadomichelaki. X. 2009. A multiple-item scale for assessing egovernment service quality. Conference Paper • (August 2009). • Source: DBLP.
[39]
Papadomichelaki, X., Mentzas, G. 2012. e-GovQual: A multiple-item scale for assessing e-government service quality. Government information quarterly,(jan 2012), 29, 1, 98--109.
[40]
Papadomichelaki, X., Gregoris Mentzas. 2012. e-GovQual: A multiple-item scale for assessing e-government service quality. Government Information Quarterly 29 (2012) 98--109. © 2011 Elsevier Inc
[41]
Parent, M., Vandebeek, C. A., & Gemino, A. C. 2005. Building citizen trust through e-government. Government Information Quarterly, 22,4,(Dec,2005), 720--736.
[42]
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., and Berry, L. L.1988. SERVQUAL: A Multiple Item Scale for Measuring Customer Perceptions of Service Quality, Journal of Retailing, 64 (1988) Spring,12--40.
[43]
Parasuraman, A.; Zeithaml, V. A., and Berry, L. L.1985. A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and its Implications for Future Research, Journal of Marketing, 49 (1985),41--50.
[44]
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V., & Berry, L. 1994. Reassessment of expectations as a comparison standard in measuring service quality: Implications for further research. Journal of Marketing, 58, 111--124.
[45]
Pitt, L.F., Watson, R.T., and Kavan, C.B.1995. Service quality: A measure of information systems effectiveness. MIS Quarterly, 19, 2 (1995), 173--188.
[46]
Quirchmayr, G., Funilkul, S., & Chutimaskul, W. 2003. A quality model of e-government services based on the ISO/IEC 9126 standard. vienna: university of vienna.
[47]
Quirchmayr, G., S. Funilkul, and W. Chutimaskul, 2007.A quality model of e-government services based on the ISO/IEC 9126 Standard. In Proceedings of International Legal Informatics Symposium (IRIS). Salzburg, Austria, (2007), 45--53.
[48]
Ray, S., Rao, V. 2004. Evaluating Government Service: A Customer Perspective of E-Government. Proceedings of 4rth Europeaon Conference on E-Governent, 17-18 June, Dublin, Ireland.
[49]
Rao, R., Rao, V., Bhatnagar, S., C. 2004. E-governance assessment framework (EAF version2.0). Technical report. Department of information technology, GoI.
[50]
Santos, J. 2003. E-service Quality: a model of virtual service dimensions. Managing service quality: An International Journal, 13,3(Jun 2003),233--246
[51]
Seffah, A., Donyaee, M., and Kline, R.B. 2006. Usability measurement and metrics:A consolidated model, Software Quality Journal 14,1, (June 2006),159--178
[52]
Shadrach, M. B., Sharma, S. 2013. Impact assessment of Indian common services centres. Ministry of Communication and Information Technology, Government of India, New Delhi.
[53]
Shang, S.S. 2014. Assessment of E-government Service Quality under User Satisfaction Orientation: The Establishment of E-Govqual Model. Asian Journal of Business Management. 6,2(May 2014),111--117, ISSN: 2041-8744; e-ISSN: 2041-8752
[54]
Ulman, M., Vostrovský, V., & Tyrychtr, J. 2013. Agricultural E-Government: Design of Quality Evaluation Method Based on ISO SQuaRE quality Model. AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, 5,4,(Dec 2013):211.
[55]
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. 2003. User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View.MIS Quarterly, 27 (Sep 2003): 425--478.
[56]
Venkatesh, V. and F.D. Davis. 2000. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model for longitudinal field studies. Management science, 46,2 (Feb,2000),186--204.
[57]
Verdegem, P. and Verleye, G. 2009. User-centered E-Government in practice: A comprehensive model for measuring user satisfaction. Government Information Quarterly, 26,3,(Jul 2009),487--497.
[58]
Voutinioti, A. 2013. Determinants of User Adoption of e-Government Services in Greece and the Role of Citizen Service Centres. Procedia Technology. 8, (Dec 2013), 238--244.
[59]
Wang, Y.S. and Shih, Y.W. 2009.Why Do People Use Information Kiosks? A Validation of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology, Government Information Quarterly, 26, 1, (209), 158--165
[60]
Wolfinbarger, M,F., and M.C. Gilly, ETAILQ: Dimensionalizing, measuring and predicting e-tailing quality, Journal of Retailing, (2003), Vol.79, No.3, pp. 183--198.
[61]
Yoo, Boonghee & Naveen, Donthu. (2001). Developing a Scale to Measure the Perceived Quality of Internet Shoing Sites (SITEQUAL), Quarterly Journal of Electronic commerce, 2,1,(2001), 31--45.
[62]
Zaidi, S. F. H., & Qteishat, M. K. 2012. Assessing e-Government service delivery (government to citizen). International Journal of e Business and e Government Studies, 4,1,(2012), 45--54. ISSN: 2146-0744 (Online)
[63]
Zaied, A. N. H.2012. An integrated success model for evaluating information system in public sectors. Journal of Emerging Trends in Computing and Information Sciences, 3,6,(Jul,2012), 814--825.
[64]
Zeithaml, V. A., Parasuraman, A., & Malhotra, A. 2002. Service quality delivery through web sites: a critical review of extant knowledge. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 30,4,(Oct,2002), 362--375.
[65]
www.nisg.org/
[66]
www.csc.gov.in

Cited By

View all
  1. A Comprehensive Multidimensional Conceptual Model to Assess the e-Governance Service Quality at Common Service Centers in India

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICEGOV '17: Proceedings of the Special Collection on eGovernment Innovations in India
    March 2017
    160 pages
    ISBN:9781450349307
    DOI:10.1145/3055219
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 07 March 2017

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Citizen (user) Satisfaction
    2. Common Service Centers (CSC's)
    3. E-governance service quality models
    4. Service quality

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    ICEGOV '17

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 350 of 865 submissions, 40%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)18
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
    Reflects downloads up to 26 Jan 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media