skip to main content
10.1145/3003397.3003399acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesfablearnConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Toward a Making Community of Practice: The Social Aspects of Elementary Classroom-Based Making

Published: 14 October 2016 Publication History

Abstract

As Making moves from informal settings, such as museums and libraries to formal learning contexts, such as the classroom, questions arise with regard to the sustainability of the practice of Making. Learning in the classroom is continuous over time, while the integration of Making currently tend to be necessarily insular and in snapshot interventions. The development of a Making community of practice among students in the classroom is important for classroom-based Making to be sustainable. Grounded in literature on Lave and Wenger's communities of practice and Vygotsky's zone of proximal development, the work presented in this paper investigate the social aspects of Making in 5th grade science classes as indicators of the possible formation of a Making community of practice among the students. Our findings elicited different types of social roles that the students adopted, and various ways by which learning was socially mediated, and showed how help received and given varied according to student roles and over time. We discuss and conclude with the importance of pursuing further research into this topic area for Making into the classroom.

References

[1]
Vossoughi, S. and B. Bevan, Making and tinkering: A review of the literature. National Research Council Committee on Out of School Time STEM, 2014: p. 1--55.
[2]
Halverson, E.R. and K.M. Sheridan, The Maker Movement in Education. Harvard Educational Review, 2014. 84(4): p. 495--504.
[3]
Peppler, K., E. Halverson, and Y.B. Kafai, Makeology: Makerspaces as Learning Environments. Vol. 1. 2016: Routledge.
[4]
Bar-El, D. and O. Zuckerman. Maketec: A Makerspace as a Third Place for Children. in Proceedings of the TEI'16: Tenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction. 2016. ACM.
[5]
Lave, J. and E. Wenger, Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. 1991: Cambridge university press.
[6]
Wenger, E., Communities of practice: Learning, meanings, and identity. 2007, Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
[7]
Telhan, O., et al. Connected messages: a maker approach to interactive community murals with youth. in Proceedings of the 2014 conference on Interaction design and children. 2014. ACM.
[8]
Sheridan, K., et al., Learning in the making: A comparative case study of three makerspaces. Harvard Educational Review, 2014. 84(4): p. 505--531.
[9]
Cohen, J.D., et al. Makification: Towards a Framework for Leveraging the Maker Movement in Formal Education. in Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. 2016.
[10]
Naghshbandi, S., Identifying secondary school teachers' understandings and implementations of design thinking within a design-based research Approach, 2014, University of British Columbia.
[11]
Bevan, B., et al., Learning Through STEM- Rich Tinkering: Findings From a Jointly Negotiated Research Project Taken Up in Practice. Science Education, 2015. 99(1): p. 98--120.
[12]
Wardrip, P.S. and L. Brahms. Learning practices of making: developing a framework for design. in Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children. 2015. ACM.
[13]
Dubé, L., A. Bourhis, and R. Jacob, The impact of structuring characteristics on the launching of virtual communities of practice. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 2005. 18(2): p. 145--166.
[14]
Wenger, E., Communities of practice: A brief introduction. 2011.
[15]
Lesser, E. and L. Prusak, Communities of practice, social capital and organizational knowledge. Information Systems Review, 1999. 1(1): p. 3--10.
[16]
Wenger, E., Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. 1998: Cambridge university press.
[17]
Wenger, E., R. McDermott, and W.M. Snyder, Seven principles for cultivating communities of practice. Cultivating Communities of Practice: a guide to managing knowledge, 2002. 4.
[18]
Davenport, T. and L. Prusak, Working knowledge: How organizations know what they know. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, 2000.
[19]
Ardichvili, A., V. Page, and T. Wentling, Motivation and barriers to participation in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice. Journal of knowledge management, 2003. 7(1): p. 64--77.
[20]
Vygotsky, L.S., Thought and Langauge (Eds. and trans. Eugenia Hanfmann & Gertrude Vakar). 1962, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[21]
Vygotsky, L.S., Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes, ed. M. Cole, et al. 1978, Cambridge, M.A.: Harvard University Press.
[22]
Daniels, H., M. Cole, and J.V. Wertsch, eds. The Cambridge Companion to Vygotsky. 2007, Cambridge University Press.
[23]
Doolittle, P.E., Vygotsky's zone of proximal development as a theoretical foundation for cooperative learning. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 1997. 8(1): p. 83--103.
[24]
V. Mariage, C.S.E., M. Arthur Garmon, Troy, The teacher as" more knowledgeable other" in assisting literacy learning with special needs students. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 2000. 16(4): p. 299--336.
[25]
Safia, A. and T. Mala. Ascertaining the More Knowledgeable Other among peers in collaborative e-learning environment. in 2012 Fourth International Conference on Advanced Computing (ICoAC). 2012. IEEE.
[26]
Elo, S. and H. Kyngäs, The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of advanced nursing, 2008. 62(1): p. 107--115.
[27]
Handley, K., et al., Within and beyond communities of practice: Making sense of learning through participation, identity and practice. Journal of management studies, 2006. 43(3): p. 641--653.
[28]
Lave, J. and E. Wenger, Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. 1st ed. 1991, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[29]
Wenger, E., R.A. McDermott, and W. Snyder, Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. 2002: Harvard Business Press.
[30]
Boylan, M., Ecologies of participation in school classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2010. 26(1): p. 61--70.
[31]
Jenkins, T. and I. Bogost. Escaping the Sandbox: Making and Its Future. in Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction. 2015. ACM.

Cited By

View all
  1. Toward a Making Community of Practice: The Social Aspects of Elementary Classroom-Based Making

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    FabLearn '16: Proceedings of the 6th Annual Conference on Creativity and Fabrication in Education
    October 2016
    120 pages
    ISBN:9781450348027
    DOI:10.1145/3003397
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    In-Cooperation

    • Stanford University: Stanford University

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 14 October 2016

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Children
    2. Communities of Practice
    3. Diversity
    4. Maker Movement
    5. Underrepresented Populations
    6. Zone of Proximal Development

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    FabLearn '16

    Acceptance Rates

    FabLearn '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 8 of 19 submissions, 42%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 14 of 35 submissions, 40%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)10
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
    Reflects downloads up to 05 Feb 2025

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Figures

    Tables

    Media

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media