skip to main content
10.1145/2993318.2993343acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessemanticsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

GADES: A Graph-based Semantic Similarity Measure

Published: 12 September 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Knowledge graphs encode semantics that describes resources in terms of several aspects, e.g., neighbors, class hierarchies, or node degrees. Assessing relatedness of knowledge graph entities is crucial for several data-driven tasks, e.g., ranking, clustering, or link discovery. However, existing similarity measures consider aspects in isolation when determining entity relatedness. We address the problem of similarity assessment between knowledge graph entities, and devise GADES. GADES relies on aspect similarities and computes a similarity measure as the combination of these similarity values. We empirically evaluate the accuracy of GADES on knowledge graphs from different domains, e.g., proteins, and news. Experiment results indicate that GADES exhibits higher correlation with gold standards than studied existing approaches. Thus, these results suggest that similarity measures should not consider aspects in isolation, but combinations of them to precisely determine relatedness.

References

[1]
J. Benik, C. Chang, L. Raschid, M.-E. Vidal, G. Palma, and A. Thor. Finding cross genome patterns in annotation graphs. In DILS, 2012.
[2]
J. J. Jiang and D. W. Conrath. Semantic similarity based on corpus statistics and lexical taxonomy. arXiv preprint cmp-lg/9709008, 1997.
[3]
M. Lee, B. Pincombe, and M. Welsh. An empirical evaluation of models of text document similarity. Cognitive Science, 2005.
[4]
D. Lin. An information-theoretic definition of similarity. In ICML, volume 98, 1998.
[5]
C. Paul, A. Rettinger, A. Mogadala, C. A. Knoblock, and P. Szekely. Efficient graph-based document similarity. In ESWC. Springer, 2016.
[6]
V. Pekar and S. Staab. Taxonomy learning: factoring the structure of a taxonomy into a semantic classification decision. In 19th international conference on Computational linguistics-Volume 1, 2002.
[7]
C. Pesquita, D. Pessoa, D. Faria, and F. Couto. Cessm: Collaborative evaluation of semantic similarity measures. JB: Challenges in Bioinformatics, 157, 2009.
[8]
P. Resnik et al. Semantic similarity in a taxonomy: An information-based measure and its application to problems of ambiguity in natural language. J. Artif. Intell. Res.(JAIR), 11, 1999.
[9]
I. T. Ribón and M. Vidal. Exploiting information content and semantics to accurately compute similarity of go-based annotated entities. In IEEE CIBCB, 2015.
[10]
I. T. Ribón, M. Vidal, and G. Palma. Onsim: A similarity measure for determining relatedness between ontology terms. In DILS, 2015.

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences
SEMANTiCS 2016: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Semantic Systems
September 2016
207 pages
ISBN:9781450347525
DOI:10.1145/2993318
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

In-Cooperation

  • Ghent University: Ghent University
  • AIT: Austrian Institute of Technology
  • Stanford University: Stanford University
  • Wolters Kluwer: Wolters Kluwer, Germany
  • Semantic Web Company: Semantic Web Company

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 12 September 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Semantic similarity measures
  2. data-driven tasks
  3. knowledge graph

Qualifiers

  • Short-paper
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Conference

SEMANTiCS 2016

Acceptance Rates

SEMANTiCS 2016 Paper Acceptance Rate 18 of 85 submissions, 21%;
Overall Acceptance Rate 40 of 182 submissions, 22%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)27
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
Reflects downloads up to 09 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media