skip to main content
10.1145/2945408.2945414acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesfseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The M3 (measure-measure-model) tool-chain for performance prediction of multi-tier applications

Published: 21 July 2016 Publication History

Abstract

Performance prediction of multi-tier applications is a critical step in the life-cycle of an application. However, the target hardware platform on which performance prediction is re- quired is often different from the testbed one on which the application performance can be measured, and is usually un- available for deployment and load testing of the application. In this paper, we present M3, our Measure-Measure-Model method, which uses a pipeline of three tools to solve this problem. The tool-chain starts with AutoPerf, which mea- sures the CPU service demands of the application on the testbed. CloneGen then takes this and the number and size of network calls as input and generates a clone, whose CPU service demand matches the application’s. This clone is then deployed on the target, instead of the original application, since its code is simple, does not need a full database, and is thus easier to install. AutoPerf is used again to measure CPU service demand of the clone on the target, under light load generation. Finally, this service demand is fed into PerfCenter which is a multi-tier application performance modeling tool, which can then predict the application per- formance on the target under any workload. We validated the predictions made using the M3 tool-chain against direct measurement made on two applications - DellDVD and RU- BiS, on various combinations of testbed and target platforms (Intel and AMD servers) and found that in almost all cases, prediction error was less than 20%.

References

[1]
Apache jmeter. http://jmeter.apache.org/.
[2]
S. Becker, H. Koziolek, and R. Reussner. The palladio component model for model-driven performance prediction. Journal of Systems and Software, 82(1):3–22, 2009.
[3]
A. Deshpande, V. Apte, and S. Marathe. Perfcenter: a performance modeling tool for application hosting centers. In ACM WOSP, 2008.
[4]
www.cse.iitb.ac.in/panda/perfcenter.
[5]
S. Duttagupta, M. Kumar, and V. Apte. Performance mimicking benchmarks for multi-tier applications. In Companion Publication for ACM/SPEC ICPE, 2016.
[6]
K. Hoste, A. Phansalkar, L. Eeckhout, A. Georges, L. K. John, and K. De Bosschere. Performance prediction based on inherent program similarity. In ACM PACT, 2006.
[7]
M. Kuperberg, K. Krogmann, and R. Reussner. Performance prediction for black-box components using re-engineered parametric behaviour models. In Component-Based Software Engineering, pages 48–63. Springer, 2008.
[8]
S. S. Shirodkar and V. Apte. Autoperf: An automated load generator and performance measurement tool for multi-tier software systems. In ACM WWW, 2007.
[9]
www.cse.iitb.ac.in/panda/tools/autoperf.
[10]
B. C. Tak, C. Tang, H. Huang, and L. Wang. Pseudoapp: Performance prediction for application migration to cloud. In IEEE Integrated Network Management, 2013.
[11]
Introduction The M3 approach - an illustrative example The M3 tool chain AutoPerf PerfCenter CloneGen Validation Related Work Conclusions and Future Work Acknowledgments References

Cited By

View all

Recommendations

Comments

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
QUDOS 2016: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Quality-Aware DevOps
July 2016
47 pages
ISBN:9781450344111
DOI:10.1145/2945408
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 21 July 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Benchmark
  2. Modeling
  3. Multi-tier
  4. Performance
  5. Prediction

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Conference

ISSTA '16
Sponsor:

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)2
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 29 Jan 2025

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

View Options

Login options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Figures

Tables

Media

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media